Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Orlando, Florida, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-58-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA
Current research on inquiry-based learning has biases by extensively focusing on the face-to-face contexts in the domains of mathematics and sciences and ignoring online contexts in other disciplines. This may be due to the following reasons. First, we have not developed a comprehensive view of current research on inquiry-based learning across different subject domains. Second, we have not systematically explored how the current relevant research on face-to-face learning contexts can be implemented in the online contexts. Therefore, the goal of this paper is to establish a theoretical framework of inquiry-based learning across different areas and analyze how this framework can be implemented in the online context. Further research directions of online inquiry-based learning have also been discussed in this paper.
Lin, J. & Tallman, J. (2006). A Theoretical Framework for Online Inquiry-Based Learning. In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2006--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 967-974). Orlando, Florida, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 26, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22178/.
- Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
- Chinn, C.A., & Malhotra, B.A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.
- Coleman, E.B. (1998). Using explanatory knowledge during collaborative problem solving in science. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 387-427.
- De Vries, E., Lund, K., & Baker, M. (2002). Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 63-103.
- Duffy, T., & Cunningham, D.J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology: A project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Edelson, D.C. (2001). Learning-for-Use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355-385.
- Greene, B.A., & Land, S.M. (2000). A qualitative analysis of scaffolding use in a resource-based learning environment involving the WorldWide Web. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(2).
- Gunawardena, C.N., & McIsaac, M.S. (2003). Distance education. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology: A project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 355-395). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Hancock, C., Kaput, J.J., & Goldsmith, L.T. (1992). Authentic inquiry with data: Critical barriers to classroom implementation. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 337-364.
- Hill, J.R. (1999). A conceptual framework for understanding information seeking in open-ended information systems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 5-27.
- Hill, J.R., & Hannafin, M.J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37-52.
- Krajcik, J.S., Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W., Bass, K.M., & Fredricks, J. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 313-350.
- Lawson, A.E. (1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Lim, B.R. (2004). Challenges and issues in designing inquiry on the Web. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 627-643.
- Linn, M.C., & Slotta, J.D. (2000). WISE science. Educational Leadership, 58(2), 29-32.
- Llewellyn, D. (2002). Inquiry within: Implementing inquiry-based science standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
- McCollum, J.A. (1978). Ah Hah! The inquiry process of generating and testing knowledge. Santa Monica, California: Goodyear Publishing Company
- Molinari, D.L. (2004). The role of social comments in problem-solving groups in an online class. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), 89-101.
- Petrides, L.A. (2002). Web-based technologies for distributed (or distance) learning: Creating learning-centered educational experiences in the higher education classroom. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(1), 69-77.
- Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child (D. Coltman, Trans.). New York: Orion Press.
- Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development (T. Brown& K.J. Thampy, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Rosebery, A.S., Warren, B., & Conant, F.R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(1), 61-94.
- Rudolph, J.L. (2005). Inquiry, instrumentalism, and the public understanding of science. Science Education, 89(5), 803-821.
- Sandoval, W.A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634-656.
- Sandoval, W.A., & Morrison, K. (2003). High school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 369-392.
- Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37-68.
- Schlosser, L.A., & Simonson, M. (2002). Distance education: Definition and glossary of terms. Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
- Schwab, J.J. (1978). Science, curriculum nd liberal education. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
- Short, K.G. (1996). Learning together through inquiry: From Columbus to integrated curriculum. York, ME: Stenhouse.
- Short, K.G., Harste, J.C., & Burke, C. (1996). Creating classroom for authors and inquirers (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
- Song, L., Singleton, E.S., Hill, J.R., & Koh, M.H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 59-70.
- Topper, A. (2005). Facilitating student interactions through discursive moves: An instructor's experience teaching online graduate course in Educational Technology. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 55-67.
- Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on the legacy of Vygotsky. In C.D. Lee& P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 51-85).
- Windschitl, M. (2000). Supporting the development of science inquiry skills with special classes of software. Educational Technology Research& Development, 48(2), 81-95.
- Zuckerman, G., Chudinova, E.V., & Khavkin, E.E. (1998). Inquiry as a pivotal element of knowledge acquisition within the Vygotskian paradigm: Building a science curriculum for the elementary school. Cognition and Instruction, 16(2), 201 DASHDASH
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.