You are here:

An Experimental Study Addressing Faculty Concers about First Time Online Course Development
PROCEEDINGS

, The University of Texas at Tyler, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Vancouver, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-57-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide research about higher education faculty concerns when faced with developing a course for the online environment. The Statement of Concerns Questionnaire (SoCQ) from the Concerns Based Assessment Model(CBAM) was used as the survey instrument in this study and Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was used to analyze the results. The results of the study indicate that classroom training and hands-on laboratory training are effective in addressing the concerns faculty face when developing an online course for the first time.

Citation

Dobbs, R. (2005). An Experimental Study Addressing Faculty Concers about First Time Online Course Development. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2005--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2012-2025). Vancouver, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 1, 2021 from .

© 2005 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Gall, M.D., Borg, W.R., & Gall, J.P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (6th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
  2. Hall, G., George, A., & Rutherford, W. (1986). Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for use of the SoC questionnaire (Rev. Ed.). Austin: Southwest EducationalDevelopment Laboratory.
  3. Hall, G., & Hord, S. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. New York: State University of New York Press.
  4. Hord, S., Rutherford, W., Huling-Austin, L., & Hall, G. (1998). Taking charge of change. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
  5. Moore, M., & Kearsley G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Atlanta, GA: Wadsworth.
  6. National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Distance Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions: 2000–2001 (NCES 98-132). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  7. Sherry, L. (1995). Issues in distance learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1 (4): 339-347.
  8. Smith, N.T. (1998). Student satisfaction in distance learning classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A & M University, College Station.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References