You are here:

TPCK and Initial teacher education: Insights on the development of pedagogical reasoning in TPCK-based instructional design (ID) practices

, , University of Padova, Italy

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Washington, D.C., United States ISBN 978-1-939797-32-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


In the last decades, TPCK (Mishra & Koehler, 2006; Angeli & Valanides, 2009) has come to the forefront of educational research, acknowledging the growing role of technologies in educational practices in the definition of teachers’ knowledge, with major consequences also in the field of teacher education. Moreover, teachers’ pedagogical reasoning (Loughran et al., 2016), along with tacit beliefs, is proving to be a powerful doorway to link (student) teachers’ pedagogical choices and technologies’ intended uses (Heitnik et al., 2016). This paper moves from these considerations to describe an ongoing research, aimed at investigating TPCK-related instructional design procedures (IDP - Angeli & Valanides, 2013; Messina, De Rossi et al., 2016) offered by three initial teacher education programs (Cyprus, Italy, The Netherlands), in relation to the development of student teachers’ pedagogical reasoning (STPR). Pre/post questionnaires, focused interviews, and observation protocols will be used to gather data while participants are engaged in TPCK-based ID tasks, in an explanatory sequential mixed method design. Expected findings will hopefully let see a connection between the use of TPCK-based IDP and STPR development. Finally, we will try to identify some communal structural elements among the different procedures, in the perspective of a future definition of an internationally shared IDP to support STPR development, to the service of policymakers and initial teacher educators.


Trevisan, O. & De Rossi, M. (2018). TPCK and Initial teacher education: Insights on the development of pedagogical reasoning in TPCK-based instructional design (ID) practices. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2128-2132). Washington, D.C., United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development and assessment of ICT_TPCK: Advances in Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Computers& Education, 52(1), 154-168.
  2. Baran, E., & Uygun, E. (2016). Putting technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) in action: An integrated TPACK-design-based learning (DBL) approach. Australasian journal of educational technology, 32(2), 47-63.
  3. Chai, C.S., Koh, J.H.L., & Tsai, C.C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology& Society, 16(2), 31-51.
  4. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. Fifth edition. London: Routledge.
  5. Cox, S. (2008). A conceptual analysis of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Published dissertation. Provo, UT: Birmingham Young University. Creswell, J.W., (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Fourth Edition. Los Angeles: Sage.
  6. Doering, A., Scharber, C., Miller, C., & Veletsianos, G. (2009). Geothentic : designing and assessing with technological pedagogical content knowledge. In G.L. Bull, & L. Bell (Eds.), Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, Vol. 9(3) (pp. 316–336).
  7. Ertmer, P.A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.
  8. Ertmer, P.A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.
  9. Figg, C, & Jaipal, K. (2012). TPACK-in-Practice: Developing 21st century teacher knowledge. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of society for information technology& Teacher education international conference 2012 (pp. 4683-4689). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  10. Guerrero, S. (2010). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 26(4), 132-139.
  11. Harris, J.B., & Hofer, M.J. (2009). Instructional planning activity-types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK development. In C.D. Maddux (Ed.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education (pp. 99-108), Chesapeake, VA: Society for Information Technology.
  12. Harris, J.B., & Hofer, M.J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers' curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211-229.
  13. Heitink, M., Voogt, J., Verplanken, L., van Braak, J., & Fisser, P. (2016). Teachers' professional reasoning about their pedagogical use of technology. Computers& Education, 101, 70-83.
  14. Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2015). Effect of a TPACK-SRL model on teachers’ pedagogical beliefs, selfefficacy, and technology-based lesson design. In C. Angeli, & N. Valanides, Technological pedagogical content knowledge. Exploring, developing, and assessing TPCK (pp.89-112). NY:
  15. Loughran, J., Keast, S., & Cooper, R. (2016). Pedagogical Reasoning in Teacher Education. In J. Loughran, M.L. Hamilton (eds.), International Handbook of Teacher Education, (pp. 387-421). Springer
  16. McKenney, S., Kali, Y., Markausikaite, L., & Voogt, J. (2015). Teacher design knowledge for technology enhanced learning: an ecological framework for investigating assets and needs. Instructional Science, 43, 181-202.
  17. Messina, L., De Rossi, M., Tabone, S., Tonegato, P. (2016). Integrare le tecnologie nella progettazione didattica: una ricerca su capacità d’uso delle tecnologie e opinioni relative agli elementi progettuali. In M. Rui (Eds.) Proceedings of the Conference Design the Future! (pp. CLXI – CLXXII), Genova University Press, Genova.
  18. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  19. Niess, M., & Gillow-Wiles, H. (2017). Expanding teachers’ technological pedagogical reasoning with a systems pedagogical approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 77-95.
  20. Papanastasiou, E.C., & Angeli, C. (2008). Evaluating the Use of ICT in Education: Psychometric Properties of the Survey of Factors Affecting Teachers Teaching with Technology (SFA-T3). Educational Technology& Society, 11(1), 69-86.
  21. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs for the study of teaching. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed.) (pp.3-36). New York: Macmillan.
  22. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23.
  23. So, H., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 101-116
  24. Starkey, L. (2010). Teachers’ pedagogical reasoning and action in the digital age, Teachers and Teaching, 16(2), 233-244.
  25. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & Van Braak, J. (2012). Technological pedagogical content knowledge-a review of the literature. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109-121.
  26. Wang, Q. (2008). A generic model for guiding the integration of ICT into teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(3), 411-419.
  27. Yilmaz-Ozden, S., Mouza, C. & Harlow Shinas, V. (2016). Teaching knowledge with curriculum based technology: Development of a survey instrument for pre-service teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 24(4), 471-499

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact