You are here:

Developing and Modeling Pedagogy with Interactive Video

, , , , Florida Atlantic University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Washington, D.C., United States ISBN 978-1-939797-32-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


Interactive video is a versatile, easy to use instructional tool that helps teacher educators engage students in active learning and conduct formative assessments This paper describes how faculty in the Department of Teaching and Learning at a large southeastern university use web-based interactive video tools in graduate and undergraduate courses to help students develop TPACK by creating lessons and discussions with active learning elements An example of how faculty utilize interactive video in educational psychology is provided Research literature and the pedagogical principles for implementing interactive video into each course are discussed The paper highlights how this tool may be adapted to various forms of instruction to meet the objectives all three different education courses


Musgrove, A., Powers, J., Gonzalez-DeHass, A. & Willems, P. (2018). Developing and Modeling Pedagogy with Interactive Video. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1649-1655). Washington, D.C., United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 25, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Alesandrini, K. & Larson, L. (2002). Teachers bridge to constructivism. The ClearingHouse, 75(3), 118-121.
  2. Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Staying the course: Online education in the United States, 2008. Sloan Consortium. PO Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950.
  3. Baker, A. (2016). Active learning with interactive videos: Creating student-guided learning materials. Journal of Library& Information Services in Distance Learning, 10(3-4), 79-87.
  4. Brame, C.J. (2016). Effective Educational Videos: Principles and Guidelines for Maximizing Student Learning from Video Content. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(4), 1-6.
  5. Croxton, R.A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314.
  6. Florida Atlantic University (2016). Florida Atlantic University 2015-2016 catalog. Retrieved from Gagne, R.M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  7. Gonzalez-DeHass, A.R. & Willems, P.P. (2015). Case study instruction in educational psychology: Implications for teacher preparation. In M. Li& Y. Zhao (Eds.), Exploring Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. Springer.
  8. Heitzmann, R. (2008). Case study instruction in teacher education: Opportunity to develop students’ critical thinking, school smarts and decision-making. Education, 128(4), 523-542.
  9. Kent, C., Laslo, E., & Rafaeli, S. (2016). Interactivity in online discussions and learning outcomes. Computers& Education, 97, 116-128.
  10. Kim, H. & Hannafin, M.J. (2008). Situated case-based knowledge: An emerging framework for prospective teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1837-1845.
  11. Mayo, J.A. (2002). Case-based instruction: A technique for increasing conceptual application in introductory psychology. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 15, 65-74.
  12. Merseth, K.K. (2008). Using case discussion materials to improve mathematics teaching practice. The mathematics educator, 11(1), 3-20.
  13. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  14. Roblyer, M.D. (2016). Integrating educational technology into teaching (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  15. Rose, E., Claudius, I., Tabatabai, R., Kearl, L., Behar, S., & Jhun, P. (2016). The Flipped Classroom in Emergency Medicine Using Online Videos with Interpolated Questions. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 51(3), 284-291.
  16. Rule, A.C. (2006). Editorial: The components of authentic learning. Journal of Authentic Learning, 3(1), 1-10.
  17. Sudzina, M.R. (1997). Case study as a constructivist pedagogy for teaching educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 9(2), 199-218.
  18. Wei, H.C., Peng, H., & Chou, C. (2015). Can more interactivity improve learning achievement in an online course? Effects of college students' perception and actual use of a course-management system on their learning achievement. Computers& Education, 83, 10-21.
  19. Wiggins, G.P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact