You are here:

Technology Integration with the Technology Integration Planning Cycle Model of Professional Development
PROCEEDING

, George Mason University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Washington, D.C., United States ISBN 978-1-939797-32-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine how thirty-three teachers in a year-long study engaged with a professional development model guided by the Technology Integration Planning Cycle (TIPC; Hutchison & Woodward, 2014). Development of the model drew on multiple perspectives to align with characteristics of high-quality professional development and support meaningful integration of technology to meet instructional goals. The study focused specifically on how teachers’ perceptions of their proficiency with integrating technology, their instruction and instructional planning, and their students’ digital literacy skills were related to participation in the professional development. Drawing on multiple sources of qualitative and quantitative data, findings indicated that selective exposure to digital tools, professional learning communities, and opportunities for reflection were most the most transformative elements of the model for teachers. Further, teachers were better prepared to envision their roles in the classroom and the purposes for integrating technology due to the TIPC framework. Finally, students in classrooms with participant teachers performed significantly better on multiple dimensions of a digital literacy assessment than the control group students.

Citation

Hutchison, A. (2018). Technology Integration with the Technology Integration Planning Cycle Model of Professional Development. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 938-948). Washington, D.C., United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Dwyer, B. (2016). Engaging All Students in Internet Research and Inquiry. The Reading Teacher, 69(4), 383-389.
  2. Ertmer, P.A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47– 61.
  3. Ertmer, P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher Beliefs and Technology Integration Practices: A Critical Relationship. Computers& Education, 59(2), 423-435. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2012.02.001
  4. Hutchison, A. & Reinking, D. (2011). Teachers’ Perceptions of Integrating Information and Communication Technologies into Literacy Instruction: A National Survey in the U.S. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 308-329.
  5. Hutchison, A., Woodward, L., & Colwell, J. (2016). What are Preadolescent Readers doing online? An examination of upper elementary students’ reading, writing, and communication in digital spaces. Reading Research Quarterly.
  6. Hutchison, A. & Woodward, L. (2014). A Planning Cycle for Integrating Technology into Literacy Instruction. Reading Teacher, 67(6), 455-464. DOI:10.1002/trtr.1225.
  7. Hutchison, A. & Woodward, L. (2014). An Examination of How A Teacher’s Use of Digital Tools Empowers and Constrains Language Arts Instruction. Computers in the Schools, 31(4), 316-338. DOI:10.1080/07380569.2014.967629
  8. Kopcha, T.J. (2012). Teachers' Perceptions of the Barriers to Technology Integration and Practices with Technology under Situated Professional Development. Computers& Education, 59(4), 1109-1121. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2012.05.014
  9. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2007). Sampling "the New" in New Literacies. In M. Knobel& C. Lankshear (Eds.), A New Literacies Sampler (Vol. 29, pp. 1-24). New York, NY: Peter
  10. Leu, D., Kinzer, C., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. (2013). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In D. Alvermann, N. Unrau, & Ruddell, R. (Eds.) Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (6th ed., pp. 1150-1181). International Reading Association.
  11. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  12. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  13. Tour, E. (2015). Digital mindsets: Teachers’ technology use in personal life and teaching. Language Learning& Technology, 19(3), 124-139.
  14. White, A. (2016). Using Digital Think‐Alouds to Build Comprehension of Online Informational Texts. The Reading Teacher, 69(4), 421-425.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.