You are here:

Early Career Teacher Professional Development: Bridging Simulation Technology with Evidence-Based Behavior Management

, Rutgers University, United States ; , , Florida International University, United States ; , Centre Européen de Réalité Virtuelle, France ; , Florida International University, United States ; , Rutgers University, United States ; , , Florida International University, United States ; , Virginia Tech, United States ; , Rutgers University, United States

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 26, Number 2, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

Early career teachers working in high poverty schools face of overwhelming challenges navigating disruptive behaviors with studies highlighting behavior problems as one of the strongest predictors of turnover (Ingersoll & Smith, 2003). Simulation-based technology leverages important pedagogical strengths (e.g., realistic training context, opportunities for practice and feedback, low-stakes training) that may confer advantage over traditional training for teachers in behavior management. This manuscript illustrates the development and refinement of Interactive Virtual Training for Teachers (IVT-T), a simulation training model to help early career teachers hone their behavior management skills by interacting with virtual students in a 3D classroom. Advisory board members (N=5) with extensive experience in high poverty schools provided iterative feedback on the authenticity and realism of IVT-T students, classrooms, and vignettes. Advisory board members rated authenticity/realism of the students, classrooms, and vignettes favorably and ratings also increased over time as new prototypes were shared. In addition, prototypes introduced earlier underwent more revisions than prototypes introduced later suggesting advisory board feedback helped the computer science team improve upon their development approaches. Open-ended feedback identified strengths and specific design recommendations to enhance instructional design. Implications for simulation training for teachers, teacher education, and leveraging advisory board feedback early in the design of IVT-T are discussed.

Citation

Shernoff, E., Frazier, S., Lisetti, C., Buche, C., Lunn, S., Brown, C., Delmarre, A., Chou, T., Gabbard, J. & Morgan, E. (2018). Early Career Teacher Professional Development: Bridging Simulation Technology with Evidence-Based Behavior Management. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 26(2), 299-326. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved November 21, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Amory, A. (2007). Game object model version II: A theoretical framework for educational game development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(1), 51-77.
  2. De Gloria, A. (2015). Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 391-411.
  3. Alvarez, J. & Michaud, L. (2008). Serious Games—Advergaming, edugaming, training and more. IDATE Consulting and Research. Retrieved July 15, 2013, from http://www.scribd.com/doc/28528416/2008-Serious-Games-Report#
  4. Marinez-Lora, A., Mehta, T.G., & Bhaumik, D. (2015). Re-designing community mental health services for urban children: Supporting schooling to promote mental health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83, 839-852.
  5. Bannan-Ritland, B. (2009). The integrative learning design framework: An illustrated example from the domain of instructional technology. In T. Plomp
  6. Battista, N. U., & Boone, W. J. (2015). Exploring the impact of TeachME Lab virtual classroom teaching simulation on early childhood education majors’ self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 237–262.
  7. Bellotti, F., Berta, R., & De Gloria, A. (2010). Designing effective serious games: Opportunities and challenges for research. IJET, 5(SI3), 22-35.
  8. Beutler, L. E., & Harwood, T. M. (2004). Virtual reality in psychotherapy training. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 317-330.
  9. Coalition for Psychology in Schools and Education (2006, August). Report on the Teacher Needs Survey. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, Center for Psychology in Schools and Education.
  10. Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). Effective instruction as a basis for effective education in schools. Tijdschrift Voor Onderwijsresearch, 19, 3-16.
  11. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixedmethods research (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  12. Crone, L. J., & Teddlie, C. (1995). Further examination of teacher behavior in differentially effective schools: Selection and socialization process. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 30(1), 1-9.
  13. Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3‐D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 1032.
  14. Denton, C. A., & Hasbrouck, J. A. N. (2009). A description of instructional coaching and its relationship to consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 19(2), 150-175. Doi:
  15. Dieker, L. A., Hynes, M., Hughes, C., & Smith, E. (2008). Implications of mixed reality simulation technologies on special education and teacher preparation. Focus on Exceptional Children, 40(6), 1-20.
  16. Dieker, L., Hynes, M., Stapleton, C., & Hughes, C. (2007). Virtual classrooms: STAR simulator. New Learning Technology SALT, 4, 1-22. Doi:10.1.1.76.5686
  17. C. E. (2014). The potential of simulated environments in teacher education: Current and future possibilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(1), 21-33.
  18. Egger, H. L., & Angold, A. (2004). The Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment (PAPA): A structured parent interview for diagnosing psychiatric disorders in preschool children. Handbook of infant, toddler, and preschool mental health assessment, 223-243. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  19. Fletcher, J. D. (2009). Education and training technology in the military. Science 323(5910), 72−75.
  20. Gabbard, J. L., Hix, D., & Swan, J. E. (1999). User-centered design and evaluation of virtual environments. IEEE computer Graphics and Applications, 19(6), 51-59.
  21. Gee, J. P. (2005). Learning by design: Good video games as learning machines. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 5-16. Doi:10.2304/
  22. Elea.2005.2.1.5
  23. Girard, C., Ecalle, J., & Magnan, A. (2012). Serious games as new educational tools: how effective are they? A meta‐analysis of recent studies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 207-219.
  24. Gonzalez, L., Brown, M. S., & Slate, J. R. (2008). Teachers who left the teaching profession: A qualitative understanding. The Qualitative Report, 13(1), 1-11.
  25. Gray, S. A. O., Carter, A. S., Briggs-Gowan, M. J., Hill, C., Danis, B., Keenan, K., & Wakschlag, L. S. (2012). Preschool children’s observed disruptive behavior:Variations across sex, interactional context, and disruptive psychopathology, Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 41(4), 499–507.
  26. Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184-205.
  27. Hartson, R., & Pyla, P. S. (2012). The UX Book: Process and guidelines for ensuring a quality user experience. New York, NY: Elsevier.
  28. Heeren, B., & Jeuring, J. (2014). Feedback services for stepwise exercises. Science of Computer Programming, 88(1), 110-129.
  29. Henry, D. B., Farrell, A. D., Schoeny, M. E., Tolan, P. H., & Dymnicki, A. B. (2011). Influence of school-level variables on aggression and associated attitudes of middle school students. Journal of School Psychology, 49(5), 481-503.
  30. Hix, D., & Hartson, H.R. (1993). Developing user interfaces: Ensuring usability through product & Process. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  31. Horswill, I., & Lisetti, C. L. (2011, November). On the Simulation of Human Frailty. In A.V., Samsonovich, & K.R., Jóhannsdóttir (Eds.), Biologically
  32. Inspired Cognitive Architectures 2011. Paper presented at the Second Annual Meeting of the BICA Society, Arlington, USA.
  33. Ingersoll, R. M., & Smith, T. M. (2003). The wrong solution to the teacher shortage. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 30-33.
  34. Jacobson, M.J., June Lee, B.K., Hong Lim, S., & Hua Low, S. (2008). An intelligent agent augmented multi-user virtual environment for learning science inquiry: Preliminary research findings. Paper presented at the 2008 American Educational Association Conference. New York, NY.
  35. Junod, R. E. V., DuPaul, G. J., Jitendra, A. K., Volpe, R. J., & Cleary, K. S. (2006). Classroom observations of students with and without ADHD: Differences across types of engagement. Journal of School Psychology, 44(2), 87-104.
  36. Kazdin, A. E. (2015). Technology-Based interventions and reducing the burdens of mental illness: Perspectives and comments on the special series. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 22(3), 359-366.
  37. Kazdin, A. E., & Blase, S. L. (2011). Rebooting psychotherapy research and practice to reduce the burden of mental illness. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 21-37.
  38. Kazdin, A.E. (2005). Parent management training (pp. 35-64). New York: Oxford University Press.
  39. Kelley, J. F. (1984). An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2(1), 26–41.
  40. Kelly, H., Howell, K., Glinert, E., Holding, L., Swain, C., & Burrowbridge, A. (2007). How to build serious games. Communications of the ACM, 50(7), 44-49.
  41. Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., de Boer, H., van Kuijk, M., & Doolaard, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of classroom management strategies and classroom management programs on students’ academic, behavioral, emotional, and motivational outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 643-680.
  42. Mantovani, F., Castelnuovo, G., Gaggioli, A., & Riva, G. (2003). Virtual reality training for healthcare professionals. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(4), 389-395.
  43. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326.
  44. Morin, S. F., Maiorana, A., Koester, K. A., Sheon, N. M., & Richards, T. A. (2003). Community consultation in HIV prevention research: A study of community advisory boards at 6 research sites. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 33(4), 513-520.
  45. Oliver, R. M., & Reschly, D. J. (2007). Effective Classroom Management: Teacher Preparation and Professional Development. TQ Connection Issue Paper. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
  46. Pallavincini, F., Toniazzi, N., Argenton, L., Aceti, L., & Mantovani, F. (2015). Developing effective virtual reality training for military forces and emergency operators: from technology to human factors. In International Conference on Modeling and Applied Simulation, MAS 2015 (pp. 206-210). Dime University of Genoa
  47. Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921-958.
  48. Regalla, M., Hutchinson, C., Nutta, J., & Ashtari, N. (2016). Examining the impact of a simulation classroom experience on teacher candidates’ sense of efficacy in communicating with English learners. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 24(3), 337-367.
  49. Rooney, P., O’Rourke, K. C., Burke, G., MacNamee, B., & Igbrude, C. (2009, March). Cross-disciplinary approaches for developing serious games in Higher Education. In Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications, 2009. VS GAMES’09. (pp. 161-165). IEEE.
  50. Santos, S. L., & Chess, C. (2003). Evaluating citizen advisory boards: The importance of theory and participant-based criteria and practical implications. Risk Analysis, 23(2), 269-279.
  51. Schrader, P. G., Archambault, L. M., & Oh-Young, C. (2011). Training by gaming: Preparing teachers of today for tomorrow’s learning environments. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 19(3), 261-286.
  52. Schussler, D., Frank, J., Lee, T., & Mahfouz, J. (2017). Using virtual role-play to enhance teacher candidates’ skills in responding to bullying. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(1), 91-120.
  53. Shernoff, E.S., Frazier, S.L. Marinez-Lora, A., Lakind, D., Atkins, M.S., Jakobsons, L., & Smylie, M. (2016). Expanding the role of school psychologists
  54. Shernoff, E.S., Lakind, D., Frazier, S.L. & Jakobsons, L. (2015). Coaching early career teachers in urban elementary schools: A mixed-method study. School Mental Health, 7(1), 6-20.
  55. Shernoff, E.S., Lekwa, A.J., Reddy, L.A. & Coccaro, C. (2017). Examining teachers’ attitudes and experiences with coaching to inform research-based practice: An iterative developmental design study. Journal
  56. Shernoff, E. S., Mehta, T. G., Atkins, M. S., Torf, R., & Spencer, J. (2011). A qualitative study of the sources and impact of stress among urban teachers. School Mental Health, 3(2), 59-69.
  57. Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D., & Sugai, G. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research
  58. Sitzmann, T. (2011). A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 489-528.
  59. Tawadrous, M., Kevan, S. D., Kapralos, B., & Hogue, A. (2012). A serious game for incidence response education and training. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge & Society, 8(4), 177-184,
  60. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2008). Quality of inferences in mixed methods research: Calling for an integrative framework. In M.M. Bergman (Ed., pp. 101-119), Advances in Mixed Methods Research: Theories and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  61. Aylett, R. (2011). “Fear Not:” A computer-based anti-bullying-programme designed to foster peer intervention. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26(1), 21-44.
  62. Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143-178.
  63. Wright, M. (2006). Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(3), 229-243.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.