You are here:

Seeing Is Believing: Peer Video Coaching as Professional Development Done With Me and for Me

, , University of Richmond, United States

CITE Journal Volume 18, Number 2, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA


As part of their graduate education, in-service teachers identified an area of instructional focus, video recorded their classroom instruction at two intervals in a semester-long course, formed peer groups, and shared their videos for the purpose of obtaining feedback for professional growth. After the conclusion of the course, participants were contacted and presented with a summary of four benefits of the peer video review process, as identified in a recent professional article. Through online survey, participants were asked to share their perceptions of the peer video review experiences in the course and address any evidence related to the benefits raised in the professional article. Qualitative analysis revealed evidence of individual and collective benefits at personal and professional levels and consensus around the value of the experience, despite common apprehension about the vulnerability involved in sharing. Additionally, participants identified strengths of the video medium and provided suggestions for practical applications of peer video review in the field.


Cassada, K. & Kassner, L. (2018). Seeing Is Believing: Peer Video Coaching as Professional Development Done With Me and for Me. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 18(2), 416-441. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Arya, P., Christ, T., & Chui, M.M. (2014). Facilitation and teacher behaviors: An analysis of literacy teachers’ video-case discussions. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(2), 111-127.
  2. Beisiegel, M., Mitchell, R., & Hill, H.C. (2018). The design of video-based professional development: An exploratory experiment intended to identify effective features. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(1), 69-89. .
  3. Blakely, M.R. (2001). A survey of levels of supervisory support and maintenance of effects reported by educators involved indirect instruction implementations. Journal of Direct Instruction, 1(2), 73-83.
  4. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M.E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417-436.
  5. Cohen, C., & Rice, J. (2005). National Board Certification as professional development: Design and cost. Washington, DC: The Finance Project.
  6. Concordia University. (2016, June 14). 10-year spending trends in U.S. Education. Retrieved from
  7. Connor, C. (2017). Commentary on the special issue on instructional coaching models: Common elements of effective coaching models. Theory into Practice, 56(1), 78-83.
  8. Daniels, E., Pirayoff, R., & Bessant, S. (2013). Using peer observation and collaboration to improve teaching practices. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 268-274.
  9. Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: VASCD.
  10. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M.E., & Gardner, M. (2017, June 5). Effective teacher PD. Retrieved from
  11. Desimone, L.M., & Pak, K. (2017). Instructional coaching as high-quality professional development. Theory Into Practice, 56(1), 3-12.
  12. DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
  13. Forsythe, M., & Johnson, H. (2017). What to see, what to say: Tips for participating in teacher video clubs. Tools for Learning Schools, 20(2), 1-7.
  14. Gaudin, C., & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 16. 41-67.
  15. Griffith, O.(2017, July 13). Knock-out teacher burn-out. Http://
  16. RetrievedfromGoverning the States and Localities. (2017). Education spending per student by state. Retrieved from
  17. Gulamhussein, A. (2013). Teaching the teachers: Effective professional development in an era of high-stakes accountability. Retrieved from
  18. Holland, J. (2017, June 29). Why this effective and passionate teacher is leaving the classroom for now. [Weblog comment]. Retrieved from
  19. Jones, H.J. (2015). The National Board Certification process as professional development: Perceptions about the impact that characteristics of the process had on professional growth (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from VCU Scholars Compass:
  20. Kassner, L.D. & Cassada, K.M. (2017). Chat it up: Backchanneling to promote reflective practice among in-service teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(4), 160-168.
  21. King, M. (2016). Six features of successful community practice. Journal of Staff Development, 37(6), 12-14.
  22. Miller, K., & Zhou, X. (2007). Learning from classroom video: What makes it compelling and what makes it hard. Retrieved from
  23. Mizell, H.(2010). Why professional development matters. Retrieved
  24. Nolan, J., & Hoover, L. (2011). Teacher supervision and evaluation: Theory into practice (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley& Sons.
  25. Pillars, W. (2014, May 20). Six signs of and solutions for teacher burnout. Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved from
  26. Rosaen, C.L., Lundeberg, M., Cooper, M., Fritzen, A., & Terpstra, M. (2008). Noticing noticing: How does the investigation of video records change how teachers reflect on their experiences? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 347-360.
  27. Sherin, M.G., & Van Es, E. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20-37.
  28. Sherin, M.G., & Han, S.Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 163-183.
  29. Sterrett, W., Dikkers, A.G., & Parker, M. (2014). Using brief instructional video clips to foster communication, reflection, and collaboration in schools. Educational Forum, 78(3), 263-274.
  30. Sterrett, W., Ongaga, K., & Parker, M.A. (2013). Developing collaborative professional growth through peer observations. Virginia Educational Leadership, 10(1), 38-53.
  31. Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J.M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  32. Swanson, K. (2014). Edcamp: Teachers take back professional development. Educational Leadership, 71(8), 36-40.
  33. Van Es, E.A., Tunney, J., Goldsmith, L.T., & Seago, N. (2014). A framework for the facilitation of teachers’ analysis of video. Journal of Teacher Education, (65)4, 340-356.
  34. Vanderburg, M., & Stephens, D. (2010). The impact of literacy coaches: What teachers value and how teachers change. The Elementary School Journal, 11(1), 141–163.
  35. Welman, P., & Bachkirova, T. (2010). The issue of power in the coaching relationship. In
  36. Wilson S.M., & Berne J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173-209.
  37. Wolpert-Gawron, H. (2016). The many roles of an instructional coach. Educational Leadership, 73(9), 56-60. Retrieved from

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact