You are here:

Teachers and Technology: Present Practice and Future Directions

, Western University, Canada ; , OISE/University of Toronto, Canada

CITE Journal Volume 18, Number 2, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA


Technology cannot be effective in the classroom without teachers who are knowledgeable about both the technology itself and its implementation to meet educational goals. While technology use in the classroom is increasing, improving learning through its application should remain the goal. In this study, the authors explored 74 middle school teachers’ beliefs about and use of technology through a technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK) lens. They sought to understand how middle school teachers use and perceive technology in practice and the factors influencing their pedagogical decisions to incorporate technology into their practice. Data included surveys, administered after a science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) outreach program and teacher interviews. Findings revealed that both internal and external barriers were present and influenced how teachers situated their pedagogy in terms of technology integration. It was also found that teachers were confident in content, pedagogy, and technology; however, most viewed technology as a tool rather than an embedded part of the learning process. This study contributes knowledge about professional development initiatives and the need to address not technology knowledge as much as the interdependence of technology, pedagogy, and subject content matter.


DeCoito, I. & Richardson, T. (2018). Teachers and Technology: Present Practice and Future Directions. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 18(2), 362-378. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved September 18, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Aldunate, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2013). Teacher adoption of technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 519-524.
  2. Baturay, M.H., Gökçearslan, S., & Sahin, S. (2017). Associations among teachers' attitudes towards computer-assisted education and TPACK competencies. Informatics in Education, 16(1), 1-23.
  3. Buckenmeyer, J.A. (2010). Beyond computers in the classroom: Factors related to technology adoption to enhance teaching and learning. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 3(4), 27-36.
  4. Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
  5. DeCoito, I., & Richardson, T. (2016). Focusing on integrated STEM concepts in a digital game. In M. Urban& D. Falvo, (Eds.), Improving K-12 STEM education through technological integration (pp. 1-23). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  6. DeMarrais, K. (2004). Qualitative interview studies: Learning through experience. In K. DeMarrais, & S.D. Lapan (Eds.), Foundations for research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences (pp. 51-68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
  7. Government of Ontario. (2014). Technology in classrooms helping students succeed: New
  8. Hango, D. (2013). Gender differences in science, technology, engineering, mathematics and computer science (STEM) programs at university. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.
  9. Hayden, K., Ouyang, Y., Scinski, L., Olszewski, B., & Bielefeldt, T. (2011). Increasing student interest and attitudes in STEM: Professional development and activities to engage and inspire learners. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1), 47-69. Retrieved from Increasing-student-interest-and-attitudes-in-stem-professional-development-andactivities-to-engage-and-inspire-learners
  10. Hechter, R., & Vermette, L.A. (2014). Tech-savvy science education? Understanding teacher pedagogical practices for integrating technology in K-12 classrooms. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 33(1), 27-47.
  11. Higgins, S., Xiao, Z., & Katsipataki, M. (2012). The impact of digital technology on learning: A summary for the Education Endowment Foundation. Londo, UK: EEF. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 18(2)
  12. Iskander, T.E., Gore, P.A., Furse, C., & Bergerson, A. (2013). Gender differences in expressed interests in engineering-related fields ACT 30-year data analysis identified trends and suggested avenues to reverse trends. Journal of Career Assessment, 21(4), 599613.
  13. Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers’ professional development. Computers& Education, 55(3), 1259-1269.
  14. Khan, S. (2011). New pedagogies on teaching science with computer simulations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(3), 215-232.
  15. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 131-152.
  16. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
  17. Kyriakides, A.O., Meletiou-mavrotheris, M., & Prodromou, T. (2016). Mobile technologies in the service of students' learning of mathematics: The example of game application A.L.E.X. In the context of a primary school in Cyprus. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 53-78.
  18. Lin, S., Lin, C., & Lee, D. (2015). The relationship between elementary school teachers' technology readiness and intention to use social media platforms for classroom management. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 8(1), 48-63.
  19. Mills, J.M., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (2010). Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
  20. Mims-Word, M. (2012). The importance of technology usage in the classroom, does gender gaps exist. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 5(4), 271-278.
  21. Mistler-Jackson, M., & Songer, N.B. (2000). Student motivation and internet technology: Are students empowered to learn science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 459-479.
  22. Nordin, H., & Faekah, T.A.T. (2016). Validation of a technological pedagogical content knowledge instrument in a Malaysian secondary school context. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 13(1), 1-24.
  23. Özdemir, M. (2016). An examination of the techno-pedagogical education competencies (TPACK) of pre-service elementary school and preschool teachers. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(10), 70-78.
  24. Ritzhaupt, A.D., Dawson, K., & Cavanaugh, C. (2012). An investigation of factors influencing student use of technology in K-12 classrooms using path analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(3), 229-254.
  25. Rosen, Y. (2009). The effects of an animation-based on-line learning environment on transfer of knowledge and on motivation for science and technology learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(4), 451-467.
  26. Ruggiero, D., & Mong, C.J. (2015). The teacher technology integration experience: Practice and reflection in the classroom. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 161-178.
  27. Sadler, P.M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96(3), 411-427.
  28. Saudelli, M.G., & Ciampa, K. (2016). Exploring the role of TPACK and teacher self-efficacy: An ethnographic case study of three iPad language arts classes. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(2), 227-247.
  29. Shroff, R.H., & Vogel, D.R. (2009). Assessing the factors deemed to support individual student intrinsic motivation in technology supported online and face-to-face discussions. Journal of Information Technology Education, 8, 59-85.
  30. Stake, R. (2000). Case studies. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435-454). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
  31. Uluyol, Ç., & Sahin, S. (2016). Elementary school teachers' ICT use in the classroom and their motivators for using ICT. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 65-75.
  32. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & Van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge– a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109-121.
  33. Wang, S., & Reeves, T.C. (2006). The effects of a web-based learning environment on student motivation in a high school earth science course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(6), 597-621.
  34. Ward, L., & Parr, J.M. (2010). Revisiting and reframing use: Implications for the integration of ICT. Computers& Education, 54(1), 113-122.
  35. Weber, K. (2012). Gender differences in interest, perceived personal capacity, and participation in STEM-related activities. Journal of Technology Education, 24(1), 18-33.
  36. Weber, K., & Custer, R. (2005). Gender-based preferences toward technology education content, activities, and instructional methods. Journal of Technology Education, 16(2), 55-71.
  37. Zimlich, S.L. (2015). Using technology in gifted and talented education classrooms: The teachers' perspective. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 14, 101-124.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact