You are here:

Investigating effects of using digital video in teacher training in Cambodia

, , TU/Eindhoven, Netherlands ; , Graduate School of Education, Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands ; , Wageningen University, Netherlands

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 26, Number 2, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

While research has shown that video can be an effective tool in the professional learning of teachers in industrialized countries, it is unknown whether this is also true for other countries with distinctive cultural, political, and historical contexts, such as Cambodia. This paper presents results from a study which examined the effectiveness of using video to introduce student-centered teaching to teachers in Cambodia. The training consisted of collaboratively watching and discussing videos of teaching practices. A 2x2 design was used, varying group conditions (team versus pair) and relevance of the material (model video versus action video). The findings indicated that although it was not possible to determine if there had been changes in teacher behavior, using video had led to an increase in teachers’ perceived knowledge of student-centered teaching, especially for the team and the model video conditions.

Citation

Lok, L., Schellings, G., Brouwer, N. & Den Brok, P. (2018). Investigating effects of using digital video in teacher training in Cambodia. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 26(2), 275-298. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved November 21, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Akpan, J. P., & Beard, L. A. (2016). Using Constructivist Teaching Strategies to Enhance Academic Outcomes of Students with Special Needs. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 392-398.
  2. Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243-260.
  3. Baeten, M., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., Parmentier, E., & Vanderbruggen, A. (2015). Student-centred learning environments: an investigation into student teachers’ instructional preferences and approaches to learning. Learning Environments Research, 19(1), 43-62.
  4. Berkvens, J.B.Y. (2009). Developing effective professional learning in Cambodia. Doctoral Dissertation. Enschede: University of Twente.
  5. Blomberg, G., Renkl, A., Sherin, M. G., Borko, H., & Seidel, T. (2013). Five research-based heuristics for using video in pre-service teacher education. Journal for educational research online, 5(1), 90.
  6. Brouwer, N. (2011). Imaging teacher learning. A literature review on the use of digital video for preservice teacher education and professional development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Nijmegen: Graduate School of Education, Radboud University Nijmegen.
  7. Brouwer, N. (2014). Was lernen Lehrpersonen durch die Arbeit mit Videos? Ergebnisse eines Dezenniums empirischer Forschung [Visual teacher learning: Review of a decade of research]. Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen- und lehrerbildung, 32 (2), 176-196.
  8. Brouwer, N., Besselink, E., & Oosterheert, I. (2017). The power of video feedback with structured viewing guides. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 60-73.
  9. Chiphiko, E., & Shawa, L. B. (2014). Implementing Learner-Centred Approaches to Instruction in Primary Schools in Malawi. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 967.
  10. Den Brok, P., Bergen, T. & Brekelmans, M. (2006). Convergence and divergence between students’ and teachers’ perceptions of instructional behaviour in Dutch secondary education. In D. L. Fisher & M.S. Khine (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments: World views (pp. 125-160). Singapore: World Scientific.
  11. Den Brok, P., Bergen, T., Stahl, R. J., & Brekelmans, M. (2004). Students’ perceptions of teacher control behaviours. Learning and Instruction, 14(4), 425-443.
  12. Den Brok, P., Levy, J., Wubbels, T., & Rodriguez, M. (2003). Cultural influences on students’ perceptions of videotaped lessons. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(3), 355-374.
  13. Desimone, L.M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Towards better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38 (3), 181– 199.
  14. Ginsburg, M.B. (2010). Improving educational quality through active- learning pedagogies: A comparison of five case studies. Educational Research, 1(3), 62-74.
  15. Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 301-320.
  16. Johansen, D. (2009). Reconciling a cognitive human architecture. In: S. Tobias, S., T.M. Duffy. (Eds.). (2009). Constructivist instruction: Success or failure?. New York/London: Routledge.
  17. Krahenbuhl, K. S. (2016). Student-centered education and constructivism: challenges, concerns, and clarity for teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 89(3), 97-105.
  18. Loyens, S. M., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2011). Instruction based on inquiry. Handbook of research on learning and instruction, 361-381.
  19. Masats, D. & Dooly, M. (2011). Rethinking the use of video in teacher-education: a holistic approach. Teaching and Initial teacher training, 27, 11511162.
  20. Meirink, J. A. (2007). Individual teacher learning in context of collaboration in teams. Doctoral Dissertation. Leiden: Leiden University.
  21. Miller, K., & Zhou, X. (2007). Learning from classroom video: What makes it compelling and what makes it hard. In R. Goldmann, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 321–334). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  22. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.E. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book. London: Sage.
  23. Ogisu, T. (2015). Pedagogy in Cambodian schools. A logic that governs teaching and learning. In Y. Kitamura, D. B. Edwards, C. Sitha, & J. Williams (eds.), The political economy of schooling in Cambodia. Issues of Quality and Equity (pp. 59-77). Hampshire: Pallgrave Macmillan.
  24. Paine, L., Bloemeke, S., & Aydarova, O. (2016). Teachers and teaching in the context of globalization. In: Rumberger, R.W. (ed). Handbook of research on teaching, 717-786. Washington: AERA.
  25. Santagata, R. (2009). Designing video-based professional development for mathematics teachers in low-performing schools. Journal of teacher education, 60(1), 38-51.
  26. Santagata, R., & Guarino, J. (2011). Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(1), 133-145.
  27. Seidel, T., Stürmer, K. & Blomberg, G. (2005). The role of video material in teacher professionalization: Does it matter to observe your own videotaped lesson or the video of an unknown colleague? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M., Schwindt, M. (2011). Teacher learning from videotaped classroom situations: does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27 (2), 259-267.
  28. Shuell, T.J. (1988). The role of the student in learning from instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13 (3), 276-295.
  29. Swinkels, M.F.J. (2017). Learning to teach with a focus on student learning. Doctoral Dissertation. Eindhoven: University of Technology Eindhoven..
  30. Song, S. (2015). Cambodian teachers’ responses to child-centered instructional policies: A mismatch between beliefs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 50, 36-45.
  31. Thurlings, M.C.G. & Den Brok, P.J. (2017). Learning outcomes of teacher professional development activities: a meta-study. Educational Review, 1-23.
  32. Zhou, X. (2004). It does matter how you slice it: Effects of viewing task on attention to classroom video. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.