You are here:

Examining English Language Teachers’ TPACK in Oral Communication Skills Teaching
PROCEEDING

, , Virginia Commonwealth University, United States, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Washington, DC ISBN 978-1-939797-29-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

This case study utilized the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) theoretical framework (Mishra & Koehler, 2006) as a lens to examine the instructional strategies of four English as a second language (ESL) teachers and their rationales for incorporating technology into their instructional practices in teaching oral communication skills. The four teachers taught adult learners at the intermediate and advanced levels of an English Language program at a university in the Southeastern United States in spring of 2015. The survey results reported low mean scores in teachers’ technological knowledge but higher mean scores for the constructs of technological content knowledge, technological pedagogical knowledge, and TPACK. The data gathered from class observations and interviews suggested that teachers’ pedagogical approaches determined the extent to which technology was used in class.

Citation

Debbagh, M. & Jones, W.M. (2017). Examining English Language Teachers’ TPACK in Oral Communication Skills Teaching. In J. Johnston (Ed.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2017 (pp. 739-751). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 22, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Brantley-Dias, L., & Ertmer, P.A. (2013). Goldilocks and TPACK: Is the construct "just right?". Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46, (2), 103-128.
  2. Diaz, D.P., & Bontenbal, K.F. (2001). Learner preferences: Developing a learner-centered environment in the online or mediated classroom. Education at Distance, 14 (80), 1-8.
  3. Graham, C.R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers& Education, 57, (3), 1953-1960.
  4. Graham, C.R., Borup, J., & Smith, N.B. (2012). Using TPACK as a framework to understand teacher candidates' technology integration decisions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, (6), 530-546.
  5. Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2005). New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 311-326.
  6. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41, (4), 393-416.
  7. Hendrix, K.G. (2000). Assessment and skill development for ESL students in mainstream communication classes requiring oral presentations. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 29 (2), 196-212.
  8. Hubbard, P., & Levy, M. (2006). The scope of CALL education In P. Hubbard& M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub. Co.
  9. Jordan, R.R. (1997). English for academic purposes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Kajee, L. (2008). Constructing identities in online communities of practice: A case study of online learning. Oxford: Peter Lang.
  11. Kimmons, R. (2015). Examining TPACK’s theoretical future. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(1), 53-77.
  12. Koehler, M.J & Mishra, P.J (2008). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). In American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp.107-128). New York: Routledge for the American Association of Colleges for Teacher
  13. Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  14. Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S. (2003). A Look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: A Review of the Literature from 1990-2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, (3) 250-273.
  15. Martin, S., Diaz, G., Sancristobal, E., Gil, R., Castro, M., & Peire, J. (2011). New technology trends in education: Seven years of forecasts and convergence. Computers& Education, 57, (3), 1893-1906.
  16. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, (6), 1017-1054.
  17. Sahin, I. (2011). Development of survey of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 97-105.
  18. Salaberry, M.R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85, (1), 39-56.
  19. Schmidt, D.A., Baran, E., Thompson, A.D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J., & Shin, T.S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, (2), 123-149.
  20. Schranck, S.R. (2007). Designing performance objectives to improve English language proficiency: Conceptualizing a callintegrated listening curriculum at Delaware Technical& Community College, Jack F. Owens Campus. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No. 3277804)
  21. Shrum, J.L. & Glisan, E.W. (2010). Teacher's handbook: Contextualized language instruction (4th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
  22. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  23. Van Olphen, M. (2008). TPCK: an integrated framework for educating world language teachers. In American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp.107-128). New York: Routledge for the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
  24. Wang, Z. & Watulak, L. (2015). Using TPACK as a lens to examine the literature on Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL). In D. Slykhuis& G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (pp. 3483-3492). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement
  25. Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (2009). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31, (2), 57-71
  26. Wentzel, K.R. And Watkins, D.E. (2011). Instruction based on peer interactions. In R.E. Mayer& P.A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction, (pp. 332-341). New York, NY: Routledge.
  27. Xiao, S.Y. (2007). Cultural teaching in twenty years: Reflection and thinking. Academic Forum, (4), 197-201.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.