You are here:

Examining Technology Integration in Middle School STEAM Units
PROCEEDING

, , , , Clemson University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, TX, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-27-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Despite the growing national interest in STEAM, predictive reports, and examples in K-12 STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art and Math) education, there is a dearth of research on STEAM teaching. Furthermore, little research exists examining essential 21st century skills (e.g. creativity, innovation, communication, collaboration) relevant to STEAM. Our research addresses one important skill in STEAM, technology integration. Similar to STEM, technology is embedded in the problem solving process offering innovative and collaborative ways to arrive at potential solutions. This research involves a longitudinal study in which middle school math and science teachers enacted STEAM teaching in their classrooms after participating in intensive professional development (PD) aimed at increasing effective STEAM teaching. This paper examples technology integration practices of teachers used during instruction, to expand what we can learn about effective STEAM instructional practices.

Citation

Herro, D., Quigley, C., Jacques, L. & Baker, A. (2017). Examining Technology Integration in Middle School STEAM Units. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1614-1623). Austin, TX, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bequette, J.W., & Bequette, M.B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art education, 65(2), 40-47.
  2. Boy, G.A. (2013, August). From STEM to STEAM: toward a human-centred education, creativity& Learning thinking. In Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (P. 3). ACM.
  3. Carnevale, A.P., Jayasundera, T., & Cheah, B. (2010). Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. Help Wanted: Projections of jobs and education requirements through 2018. Carpenter, Carpenter& Hofer (2104, July). Using TPACK to Guide a 1-to-1 iPad Pilot. THE Journal. Available at https://thejournal.com/articles/2014/07/29/tpack-and-ipads.aspx Delaney, M. (2014). Schools shift from STEM to STEAM. Edtech, April 2, 1-4.
  4. Heitink, M., Voogt, J., Verplanken, L., van Braak, J., & Fisser, P. (2016). Teachers’ professional reasoning about their pedagogical use of technology. Computers& Education, 101, 70-83.
  5. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2015). New Media Consortium (NMC) horizon report: 2015 K-12 edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  6. Jones VR (2014) Teaching STEAM: 21st century skills. Child technology engineering, 18(4):11–13
  7. Kim, C.M., Kim, M.K., Lee, C., Spector, J.M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and teacher education. 29, 76-85.
  8. Kim, Y., & Park, N. (2012). Development and Application of STEAM Teaching Model Based on the Rube Goldberg’s Invention. In Computer science and its applications (pp. 693-698). Springer: Netherlands.
  9. Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.
  10. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record,108(6), 1017.
  11. Park, N., & Ko, Y. (2012). Computer education’s teaching-learning methods using educational programming language based on STEAM education. In Network and Parallel Computing (pp. 320-327). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  12. Peppler, K., & Bender, S. (2013). Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), 22-27 Platz, Joan. (2007). How do you turn STEM into STEAM? Add the arts. Columbus: Ohio Alliance for Arts Education. Pp. 1-5.
  13. Quigley, C. & Herro, D. (2016). Finding the joy in the unknown: Implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school science and math classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology (JOST). 25(3), pp. 410-426. DOI:10.1007/s10956-016-9602-z

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.