You are here:

Pre-service Teachers' Perspectives towards Blended Learning
PROCEEDING

, Northern Illinois University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, TX, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-27-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This study focuses on exploring blended learning in technology integration courses. Convergent parallel mixed methods design was applied in the study. Pre-service teachers enrolled in technology-integration courses in a large Midwestern university participated in surveys and interviews and provided insights about blended technology-integration course. Findings from the study revealed positive perspectives towards using blended learning approach to teach technology integration courses over the traditional face-to-face approach. Future research is needed to study students’ motivation in blended technology-integration courses. The study has implications for the higher education faculty, instructional designers and technology specialists.

Citation

Ketsman, O. (2017). Pre-service Teachers' Perspectives towards Blended Learning. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1660-1663). Austin, TX, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 19, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Ausburn, L. (2004). Course design elements most valued by adult learners in blended online education environments: An American perspective. Educational Media International, 41 (4), 327-337.
  2. Drysdale, J., Graham, C., Spring, K., & Halverson, L. (2013). An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 2 (17), 90-100.
  3. Garrison, R. & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95-105.
  4. Garrison, R. & Vaughan, H. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles and guidelines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Gerbic, P. (2011). Teaching using a blended approach-what does the literature tell us? Educational Media International 48 (3), 221-234.
  6. Hastie, M., Hung, I., Chen, N., & Kinshuk (2010). A blended synchronous learning model for educational international collaboration. Innovations in Education and teaching International, 47 (1), 9-24.
  7. Holley, D., & Dobson, C. (2008). Encouraging student engagement in a blended learning environment: The use of contemporary learning spaces. Learning Media and Technology, 33 (2), 139-150.
  8. Mosca, J., Ball, D., Buzza, J., & Paul, D. (2010). A comprehensive student-based analysis of hybrid courses: Student Preferences and design criteria for success. Journal of business and Economics Research, 8 (5), 7-22.
  9. Osguthorpe, R., & Graham, C. (2003). Blended learning environments. Definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4 (3), 227-233.
  10. Schumann, R., & Skopek, T. (2009). Blurring the lines: A blended learning model in a graduate public administration program. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10 (2), 219-232.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides