You are here:

iMakers: The who, the what and the how
PROCEEDING

, , Cal State Fullerton, United States ; , University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, TX, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-27-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

There is no denying that 21st Century learners are their own unique group of learners. Despite this, and the fact that we are in the 17th year of the 21st Century, too often classrooms (and learning environments in general) are not designed or operating in ways that meet the needs of these learners. In this paper we reflect on who our so-called 21st Century learners really are and what kind of environments are best suited to their unique needs. We close with a consideration of how we as educators might alter the way we teach in order to best prepare our teacher candidates to work with these unique learners.

Citation

Donovan, L., Green, T. & Ponder, J. (2017). iMakers: The who, the what and the how. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1345-1350). Austin, TX, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bennett, S. & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students' technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 321-331.
  2. Brown, C. & Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Debunking the ‘digital native’: Beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 357-369.
  3. Friedman, A., Bolick, C., Berson, M., & Porfeli, E. (2009). National educational technology standards and technology beliefs and practices of social studies faculty: Results from a seven-year longitudinal study. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(4), 476-487.
  4. Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York: Routledge.
  5. Koutropoulos, A. (2011). Digital natives: 10 years after. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(4). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no4/koutropoulos_1211.htm
  6. Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER): 5(1), 30-39.
  7. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  8. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
  9. Rosen, L.D., Carrier, L.M., Cheever, N.A. (2010). Rewired: Understanding the iGeneration and the way they learn. St. Martin's Press. Kindle Edition.
  10. Sandholtz, J.H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D.C. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
  11. Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: How the Net Generation is changing your world. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  12. West-Puckett, S. (2013). ReMaking education: Designing classroom makerspaces for transformative learning. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/blog/classroom-makerspaces-transformative-learning-stephanie-westpuckett
  13. Zhao, Y. & Frank, K. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807-840.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.