You are here:

Empowering Pre-service Teachers to Integrate Technology: The Effect of Project-Based Instruction on Students’ Self-regulation and Self-Efficacy Perception in Face-to-Face, Hybrid and Online Learning Environment
PROCEEDING

, , Arkansas Tech University, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Washington, DC, United States Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of project-based learning (PBL) on pre-service teachers’ self-regulation and self-efficacy skills in face-to-face, hybrid and online learning environment. The investigators employed a within-subject design. The projects used were in three different learning settings: Face-to-face, hybrid and online. The results revealed that the use of the project-based teaching strategy does improve pre-service teachers’ self-regulation skills in a technology integration course. Furthermore, the results showed that students’ self-efficacy perception was significantly improved after engaging in PBL strategy and that pre-service teachers’ self-regulated skills improved equally in three different learning environments: face-to-face, hybrid and online. Finally, the results showed that the PBL activities improve pre-service teachers’ self-regulated skills, regardless their learning preferences.

Citation

Ibrahim, M. & Callaway, R. (2016). Empowering Pre-service Teachers to Integrate Technology: The Effect of Project-Based Instruction on Students’ Self-regulation and Self-Efficacy Perception in Face-to-Face, Hybrid and Online Learning Environment. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning (pp. 688-698). Washington, DC, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 27, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Abar, B., & Loken, E. (2010). Self-regulated learning and self-directed study in a pre-college sample. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(1), 25-29.
  2. Artino Jr, A. (2008). Learning online: Understanding academic success from a self-regulated learning perspective: ProQuest.
  3. Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164-180.
  4. Barrows, H.S. (2000). Problem-based learning applied to medical education: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
  5. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, 361-392.
  6. Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398.
  7. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology, 54(2), 199-231.
  8. Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational psychology review, 15(1), 1-40.
  9. Brown, I., Stothers, R., Thorp, S., & Ingram, L. (2006). The role of learning styles in the acceptance of web-based learning tools. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Conference of the Southern African Computer Lecturers Association SACLA2006.
  10. Buch, K., & Bartley, S. (2002). Learning style and training delivery mode preference. Journal of Workplace Learning, 14(1), 5-10.
  11. Butler, D., & Winne, P. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of educational research, 65(3), 245-281.
  12. Carver, C., & Scheier, M. (2001). On the self-regulation of behavior: Cambridge University Press. ‐
  13. Chai, C.S., Koh, J.H.L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A Review of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Educational Technology& Society, 16(2), 31-51.
  14. Cook, D.A., Thompson, W.G., Thomas, K.G., Thomas, M.R., & Pankratz, V.S. (2006). Impact of selfassessment questions and learning styles in Web-based learning: a randomized, controlled, crossover trial. Academic Medicine, 81(3), 231-238.
  15. Dunlosky, J., & Bjork, R. (2013). Handbook of metamemory and memory: Psychology Press.
  16. Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to selfregulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277-287.
  17. Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational psychologist, 46(1), 6-25.
  18. English, M.C., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). Supporting student self-regulated learning in problem-and project-based learning. Interdisciplinary journal of problem-based learning, 7(2), 6.
  19. Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Schuyten, G. (2008). Relationships between student cognitions and their effects on study strategies. Learning and individual differences, 18(2), 271-278.
  20. Flavell, J. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. The nature of intelligence, 12, 231-235.
  21. Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906.
  22. Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences: Basic books.
  23. Halbert, C., Kriebel, R., Cuzzolino, R., Coughlin, P., & Fresa-Dillon, K. (2011). Self-assessed learning style correlates to use of supplemental learning materials in an online course management system. Medical Teacher, 33(4), 331-333.
  24. Hammann, L., & Stevens, R. (1998). Metacognitive Awareness Assessment in Self-Regulated Learning and Performance Measures in an Introductory Educational Psychology Course.
  25. Kolb, D.A. (1976). Learning Style Inventory Technical Manual (Boston, Mcber and Company). KolbThe Learning Style Inventory: technical manual1976.
  26. Linnenbrink, E., & Pintrich, P. (2003). The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Student Engagement and Learning in the Classroom. Reading& Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119-137.
  27. Michalski, K. (2008). Learning styles and blended learning: Challenges and opportunities in distance education environment. Paper presented at the Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications.
  28. Middlebrooks, P., & Sommer, M. (2011). Metacognition in monkeys during an oculomotor task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 325.
  29. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  30. Moore, P. (1995). Information problem solving: A wider view of library skills. Contemporary educational psychology, 20(1), 1-31.
  31. Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents: IAP-Information Age Pub., Incorporated.
  32. Pintrich, P. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational psychology review, 16(4), 385-407.
  33. Puzziferro, M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. The Amer. Jrnl. Of Distance Education, 22(2), 72-89.
  34. Schraw, G., Crippen, K., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(12), 111-139.
  35. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R.S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary educational psychology, 19(4), 460-475.
  36. Schunk, D. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American educational research journal, 33(2), 359-382.
  37. Seifert, T. (2004). Understanding student motivation. Educational research, 46(2), 137-149.
  38. Simpson, C., & Du, Y. (2004). Effects of learning styles and class participation on students' enjoyment level in distributed learning environments. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 123-136.
  39. Sperling, R., Howard, B., Staley, R., & DuBois, N. (2004). Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 117-139.
  40. Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Effects of problem-based learning and traditional instruction on selfregulated learning. The journal of educational research, 99(5), 307-320.
  41. Terrell, S.R., & Dringus, L. (2000). An investigation of the effect of learning style on student success in an online learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 28(3), 231-238.
  42. Torp, L., & Sage, S. (1998). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K-12 education: ASCD.
  43. Walker, C., Greene, B., & Mansell, R. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 1-12.
  44. Winne, P., & Nesbit, J. (2010). The psychology of academic achievement. Annual review of psychology, 61, 653-678.
  45. Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining Self-Regulation: a social cognitive perspective. Handbook of selfregulation, 13-39.
  46. Zimmerman, B. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides