You are here:

Access Is Not Enough: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Study of Affordances and Challenges of Teacher Educators’ iPad Integration in Elementary Education Methods Courses
article

, Oklahoma State University, United States ; , Fort Lewis College, United States ; , , Oklahoma State University, United States

CITE Journal Volume 17, Number 3, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

Research indicates that preservice teachers’ understandings of how to integrate technology into their classrooms are dependent upon experience in their university methods courses and in their field placements. These findings place a new responsibility on teacher educators for modeling effective integration of technology into methods courses. This study focused on teacher educators’ integration of technology using iPads to enhance teaching and learning in an elementary education teacher preparation program. Four faculty members documented their own technology integration journey through collaborative autoethnography identifying the affordances and challenges of 1:1 iPad integration into their science, social studies and literacy methods courses. The researchers discovered that access to technology alone is not sufficient for faculty members to integrate iPad use in their courses. High quality use of iPads and their applications require time for exploration, experimentation, and practice, as well as professional support and development adding another dimension to the work of teacher educators.

Citation

Vasinda, S., Ryter, D.A., Hathcock, S. & Wang, Q. (2017). Access Is Not Enough: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Study of Affordances and Challenges of Teacher Educators’ iPad Integration in Elementary Education Methods Courses. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 17(3), 411-431. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Abbitt, J.T. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs about technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 134-143.
  2. Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the “digital natives” debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 321-331.
  3. Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F., and Hernandez, K. (2012). Collaborative autoethnography: Developing qualitative inquiry. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
  4. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509-535).
  5. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques to developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  6. Dresang, E.T. (2005). The information-seeking behavior of youth in the digital environment. Library Trends, 54(2), 178-196.
  7. Dufour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
  8. Eduardsen, J. (2011). Are the digital natives myth or reality: And what are their impacts on motivation? (Unpublished master's thesis). Aalborg University, Aalborg Denmark. Retrieved from http://projekter.aau.dk/projekter/files/52846629/Final_thesis.pdf
  9. Foulger, T.S., Burke, D., Williams, M.K., Waker, M.L., Hansen, R., & Slykhuis, D.A. (2013). Innovators in teacher education: Diffusing mobile technologies in teacher preparation curriculum. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30(1), 21-29.
  10. Hargis, J., Cavanaugh, C., Kamali, T., & Soto, M. (2013). Measuring the difficult to measure: Teaching and learning with an IPad. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 5(2), 60-77.
  11. Hughes, J., Thomas, R., & Scharber, C. (2006). Assessing technology integration: The RAT –replacement, amplification, and transformation-framework. In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber& D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2006 (pp. 1616-1620).
  12. Jones, C.A. (2001) Teach support: Preparing teachers to use technology. Principal Leadership, 1(9), 35-39.
  13. Johnson, K. (2006). The Millennial teacher: Metaphors for a new generation. Pedagogy, 6(1), 7-24.
  14. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
  15. Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy, and technology. Computers and Education, 49(3), 740-762.
  16. Koutropoulos, A. (2011). Digital natives: Ten years after. Journal of Online Teaching and Learning 7(4), 525-538.
  17. McLeod, J., & Vasinda, S. (2008). Critical literacy and web 2.0: Exercising and negotiating power. Computers in the Schools, 25(3-4), 259-274.
  18. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  19. Mouza, C., & Karchmer-Klein, R. (2013). Promoting and assessing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in the context of case development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 127-152.
  20. Polly, D., Mims, C., Shepherd, C., & Inan, F. (2010). Evidence of impact: Transforming teacher education with preparing tomorrow’s teachers to teach with technology (PT3) grants. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 863–870.
  21. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
  22. Samarawickrema, G., & Stacey, E. (2007). Adopting web-based learning and teaching: A case study in higher education. Distance Education, 28(3), 313-333. Doi:10.1080/01587910701611344
  23. Schuck, S., Aubusson, P., Kearney, M., & Burden, K. (2013). Mobilising teacher education: A study of a professional learning community. Teacher Development, 17(1), 1-18.
  24. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who can: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  25. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review 57(1), 1-22.
  26. Thompson, P. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers& Education 65, 12-23.
  27. Vasinda, S., Kander, F., & Sanogo, A. (2015). University Reading and mathematics clinics in the digital age: Opportunities and challenges with iPad integration. In M. Neiss & H. Gillow-Wiles (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education in the digital age (pp.139-168). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  28. Vasinda, S., & McLeod, J. (2011). Extending Readers Theater: A powerful and purposeful match with podcasting. The Reading Teacher, 64(7), 486-497.
  29. Vasinda, S., & McLeod, J. (2013). Podcasting approaches to Readers Theater. In T. Rasinski, & N. Padack (Eds.), From fluency to comprehension: Teaching practices that work (91-102). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  30. Zike, D. (2008). Dinah Zike’s notebook foldables for binders, spirals, and composition books: Strategies for all subjects grades 4-college. San Antonio, TX: Dinah-Might Adventures. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education is an online journal. All text, tables, and figures in the print version of this article are exact representations of the original. However, the original article may also include video and audio files, which can be accessed online at http://www.citejournal.org

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.