#
Prospective Teachers’ Use of Technology in Mathematics Instruction
Proceeding

## Mustafa Demir, University of Detroit Mercy, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vancouver, BC, Canada ISBN 978-1-939797-24-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

## Abstract

This study examined the prospective K-8 teachers’ use of web-based materials in their mathematics teaching. As a part of their course project, twenty-eight prospective teachers prepared lesson plans and made teaching presentations. All the lesson plans were analyzed to identify the type of technology, instructional goal, grade level, and content area they chose for their instruction. The analysis of lesson plans indicated that prospective teachers mostly used online games (OGs) as secondary instructional activities to improve K-2 students’ mathematical skills. On the other hand, they mostly used virtual manipulatives (VMs) as primary instructional activities to enhance 3-5 grade students’ knowledge of concepts and skills. The findings also revealed that prospective teachers significantly improved their pedagogical and content knowledge as a result of their participation to the course project.

## Citation

Demir, M. (2016). Prospective Teachers’ Use of Technology in Mathematics Instruction. In Proceedings of EdMedia 2016--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 823-828). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 14, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/173044/.

© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

## References

View References & Citations Map- Afari, E., Aldridge, J.M., Fraser, B.J., & Khine, M.S. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the learning environment and attitudes in game-based mathematics classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 16(1), 131-150.
- Alibali, M.W. (1999). How children change their minds: Strategy change can be gradual or abrupt. Developmental Psychology, 35, 127-145. .
- Bouck, E.C., & Flanagan, S.M. (2010). Virtual manipulatives: What they are and how teachers can use them. Intervention in School and Clinic, 45(3), 186-191. Doi:10.1177/1053451209349530.
- Bragg, L.A. (2007). Students’ conflicting attitudes towards games as a vehicle for learning mathematics: A methodological dilemma. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(1), 29-44.
- Chang, K.E., Wu, L.J., Weng, S.E., & Sung, Y.T. (2012). Embedding game-based problem-solving phase into problem-posing system for mathematics learning. Computers& Education, 58(2), 775-786.
- Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards For Mathematics. Common Core State Standards (College-and Career-Readiness Standards and K-12 Standards in English Language Arts and Math). Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers.
- Fyfe, E.R., Rittle-Johnson, B., & DeCaro, M.S. (2012). The effects of feedback during exploratory mathematics problem solving: Prior knowledge matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1094-1108.
- Gee, J.P. (2011). Reflections on empirical evidence on games and learning. In S. Tobias& J.D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 223-232). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
- Hung, P.H., Hwang, G.J., Lee, Y.H., & Su, I.H. (2012). A cognitive component analysis approach for developing game-based spatial learning tools. Computers& Education, 59(2), 762-773.
- Ke, F. (2008). A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged learning from gameplay? Computers& Education, 51(4), 1609-1620.
- Kieran, C. (2013). The false dichotomy in mathematics education between conceptual understanding and procedural skills: an example from Algebra. In Vital directions for mathematics education research (pp. 153-171). Springer New York.
- Kolovou, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Köller, O. (2013). An Intervention Including an Online Game to Improve Grade 6 Students' Performance in Early Algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(3), 510-549.
- Lane, C.P., & Harkness, S.S. (2012). Game show mathematics: Specializing, conjecturing, generalizing, and convincing. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(2), 163-173.
- Middleton, J.A., & Spanias, P.A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 65-88.
- Moyer-Packenham, P.S., Salkind, G., & Bolyard, J.J. (2008). Virtual manipulatives used by K-8 teachers for mathematics instruction: Considering mathematical, cognitive, and pedagogical fidelity. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 202-218.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- Pareto, L., Haake, M., Lindström, P., Sjödén, B., & Gulz, A. (2012). A teachable-agent-based game affording collaboration and competition: evaluating math comprehension and motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 723-751.
- Reimer, K., & Moyer, P.S. (2005). Third graders learn about fractions using virtual manipulatives: A classroom study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(1), 5-25.
- Richard, V.E. (2006). The effect of contextual pedagogical advisement and competition on middle-school students' attitude toward mathematics and mathematics instruction using a computer-based simulation game. The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(2), 165-195.
- Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M.W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 175.
- Shin, N., Sutherland, L.M., Norris, C.A., & Soloway, E. (2012). Effects of game technology on elementary student learning in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 540-560.
- Steen, K., Brooks, D., & Lyon, T. (2006). The Impact of Virtual Manipulatives on First Grade Geometry Instruction and Learning. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Teaching, 25(4), 373-391.
- Suh, J.M., & Moyer, P.S. (2008). Scaffolding special needs students' learning of fraction equivalence using virtual manipulatives. Proceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 297-304.
- Vander Kleij, F.M., Feskens, R.C., & Eggen, T.J. (2015). Effects of Feedback in a Computer-Based Learning Environment on Students’ Learning Outcomes A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 475-511.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References### Slides

- Virtual Presentation_EdMedia_2016.ppt (Access with Subscription)