You are here:

A Comparison of Classrooms of Tomorrow (COT) and 1:1 Classrooms and Associated High School Student Learning Outcomes
PROCEEDING

, , University of North Carolina at Charlotte, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Savannah, GA, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This study examines how teaching and learning are different based on classroom technology resources available to K-12 teachers and students. Objectives of the study are to: richly describe how secondary teachers are using technology to support student learning of English, mathematics, science and social studies; determine if uses of technology align with ISTE teacher standards; explore teacher motives for technology uses and determine whether these motives are associated with content areas and/or technology resources available; observe learning contexts and how these vary based on the technology resources available to teachers and students (COT vs. 1:1): and determine if differences in teacher uses of technology within core subject areas are associated with differences in student achievement and motivation.

Citation

Heafner, T. & Ashley, P. (2016). A Comparison of Classrooms of Tomorrow (COT) and 1:1 Classrooms and Associated High School Student Learning Outcomes. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 831-838). Savannah, GA, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 25, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Annetta, L.A., Minogue, J., Holmes, S.Y., & Cheng, M. (2009). Investigating the Impact of VideoGames on High School Students' Engagement and Learning about Genetics. Computers& Education, 53(1), 74-85.
  2. Bebell, D., & O'Dwyer, L.M. (2010). Educational Outcomes and Research from 1:1 Computing Settings. Journal Of Technology, Learning, And Assessment, 9(1),
  3. Cavanaugh, C., Gillan, K.J., Kromrey, J., Hess, M., & Blomeyer, R. (2004). The effects of distance education on K-12 student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Learning Point Associates/North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL).
  4. Delen, E., & Bulut, O. (2011). The Relationship between Students' Exposure to Technology and Their Achievement in Science and Math. Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(3), 311-317.
  5. Drickey, N. (2006). Learning technologies for enhancing student understanding of mathematics. International Journal of learning, 13(5), 109-116.
  6. Dunleavy, M., & Heinecke, W.F. (2008). The Impact of 1:1 Laptop Use on Middle School Math and Science Standardized Test Scores. Computers In The Schools, 24(3-4), 7-22.
  7. Frisch, J.K., Jackson, P.C., & Murray, M.C. (2013). Research and Teaching: WikiED--Using Web 2.0 Tools to Teach Content and Critical Thinking. Journal Of College Science Teaching, 43(1), 70-80.
  8. Hess, S.A. (2014) Digital Media and Student Learning: Impact of Electronic Books on Motivation and Achievement. New England Association Journal, 49(2), 35.
  9. Hunter, J.D., & Caraway, H.J. (2014). Urban youth use Twitter to transform learning and engagement. English Journal, 103(4), 76-82.
  10. Hur, J.W., & Oh, J. (2012). Learning, Engagement, and Technology: Middle School Students' Three-Year Experience in Pervasive Technology Environments in South Korea.Journal Of Educational Computing Research, 46(3), 295-312.
  11. Keengwe, J., Schnellert, G., & Mills, C. (2012). Laptop initiative: Impact on instructional technology integration and student learning. Education and Information Technologies, 17(2), 137-146.
  12. Odhabi, H. (2007). Investigating the impact of laptops on students’ learning using Bloom's learning taxonomy. British Journal of Educational Technology,38(6), 1126-1131
  13. Pregot, M.V. (2013). The Case for Blended Instruction: Is It a Proven Better Way to Teach?. Online Submission,
  14. Vaughan, N., Nickle, T., Silovs, J., & Zimmer, J. (2011). Moving to Their Own Beat: Exploring How Students Use Web 2.0 Technologies to Support GroupWork outside of Class Time. Journal Of Interactive Online Learning, 10(3), 113-127.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides