
A Revised Replication Study Typology and A Call for Participation: Replication Studies involving Technology and Teacher Education
PROCEEDING
Natalie Milman, George Washington University, United States ; Rhonda Christensen, J. Michael Spector, University of North Texas, United States ; Robert Branch, University of Georgia, United States ; Denise Schmidt-Crawford, Iowa State University, United States ; Charles Hodges, Georgia Southern University, United States ; Arlene Borthwick, National Louis University, United States ; Melanie Shoffner, Purdue University, United States ; Gerald Knezek, University of North Texas, United States ; David Rutledge, New Mexico State University, United States ; Meghan Manfra, North Carolina State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Savannah, GA, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
In this session panelists will define what replication studies are, explain why they are needed, and invite researchers to conduct multi-site replication studies of technology and teacher education using common methods and measures. Additionally, panelists will share a revised replication study typology for describing the types of replication studies researchers may wish to complete, as well as solicit critique and feedback of the revised typology. Participants will engage with panelists in small groups to critique the revised typology, discuss targeted areas of replication research, and determine next steps for moving the call for participation to one of action.
Citation
Milman, N., Christensen, R., Spector, J.M., Branch, R., Schmidt-Crawford, D., Hodges, C., Borthwick, A., Shoffner, M., Knezek, G., Rutledge, D. & Manfra, M. (2016). A Revised Replication Study Typology and A Call for Participation: Replication Studies involving Technology and Teacher Education. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1115-1119). Savannah, GA, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved April 9, 2021 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/171829/.
© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
References
View References & Citations Map- Christensen, R., Spector, J.M., Thompson, A., Schmidt-Crawford, D., Bull, G. & Knezek, G. (2015). Innovation versus Replication in Research Findings: Has the Novelty of New Research Findings Worn Off?. In D. Slykhuis& G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (pp. 1126-1129). Chesapeake, VA:
- Hodges, C. (2015). Replication studies in educational technology. TechTrends, 59(4), 3-4.
- Lykken, D.T. (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151– 159.
- Makel, M.C., & Plucker, J.A. (2014). Facts are more important than novelty: Replication in the education sciences. Educational Research, 20(10), 1–13. Retrieved December 17, 2014 from http://edr.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/07/23/0013189X14545513
- Spector, J.M., Johnson, T.E., Young, P.A. (2014). An editorial on replication studies and scaling up efforts. Education Technology Research& Development, 63(1), 1-4.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesSlides
- presentation_3071_48077.pptx (Access with Subscription)