Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Savannah, GA, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA
Pursuing an iterative process of design and assessment, this paper presents Phase 4 of a research project based on the design, develop, and assessment of a preservice secondary teacher technology education course. This phase examined the course’s impact on candidates’ knowledge and attitudes about technology. Quantitative data were collected using a pre and post questionnaire. The course positively impacted participants’ attitudes about technology use in instructional practice. The course did not result in changes in participants’ TK or TCK but did result in participants’ improved ability to consider and plan for technologies that would support their disciplinary content goals and positive learning outcomes for their students. Candidates’ responses endorsed the impact of the course on their thinking about technology and the teaching/learning process as well as the course’s ability to promote the established learning goals.
Hathaway, D. & Norton, P. (2016). A Preservice Secondary Education Technology Course: Attitudes, Knowledge, and Learner Outcomes. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 690-697). Savannah, GA, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 25, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/171753/.
© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
- Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technology and pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers& Education, 52, 154-168.
- Borko, H., & Punam, R.T. (1995). Expanding a teacher’s knowledge base: A cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In T.R. Guskey & M. Huberman (eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms& Practices (pp. 35-66). New York: Teachers College Press
- Cobb, P. (2001). Supporting the improvement of learning and teaching in social and institutional context. In S.M. Carver& D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 455-478). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Ertmer, P.A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
- Ertmer, P.A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers& Education, 64, 175-182.
- Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Retrieved from http://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics online. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/standards/content.aspx?id=16909
- Norton, P., & Hathaway, D. (2014). Using a design pattern framework to structure online course content: Two design cases. In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning inCorporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2014 (pp. 1440-1449). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in
- Palak, D., & Walls, R. (2009). Teachers’ beliefs and technology practices: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 417-441.
- Pelton, L., & Pelton, T.W. (1996). Building attitudes: How a technology course affects preservice teachers’ attitudes about technology. Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 1996, 167-172.
- Polly, D., & Hannafin, M. (2010). Reexamining how learner-centered professional development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 557-571.
- Razzak, N.A. (2014). In-service teachers’ attitudes towards technology integration in the Bahraini classroom. World Journal on Educational Technology, 6(1), 60-74,
- Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers& Education, 54, 103-112.
- Sauro, J. (2013, August 13). Best practices for using statistics on small sample sizes. Measuring Usability. Retrieved from http://www.measuringu.com/blog/small-N.php
- Schmidt, D.A., Baran, E., Thompson, A.D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J., & Shin, T.S. (2009). Technological, pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
- Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 12(2), 4-14.
- Stolterman, E. (2008). The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 55-65.
- The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32 (1), 5-8.
- Westhoff, L.M., & Polman, J.L. (2008). Developing preservice teachers' pedagogical content knowledge about historical thinking. International Journal of Social Education, 22(2), 1-28.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.