Easing Teachers and Students into the 3D Printer Maker Movement PROCEEDING
Nicholas Eastham, Terence Cavanaugh, University of North Florida, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Savannah, GA, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA
Based on practical experiences, the authors observed that 3D designers follow the Power Rules concerning how many are makers versus how many are users. This paper presents an approach we have used with K12 students, inservice teachers, undergraduate and graduate students in introducing 3D printing through a prosumer development process, by first focusing on using and adapting existing designs, then moving to original design creation. The paper also describes a 3D printing experimental class developed for graduate students to learn about 3D printing using an asynchronous distance learning approach.
Eastham, N. & Cavanaugh, T. (2016). Easing Teachers and Students into the 3D Printer Maker Movement. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 136-142). Savannah, GA, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 20, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/171661/.
© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
- Anderson, C. (2012) Makers: The new industrial revolution. New York: Crown Business.
- Arthur, C. (2000, July 20). What is the 1% rule? The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2006/jul/20/guardianweeklytechnologysection2
- Beal, G.M., Rogers, E.M., & Bohlen, J.M. (1957). Validity of the concept of stages in the adoption process. Rural Sociology, 22(2), 166-168.
- Bunkley, N. (2008, March 3). Joseph Juran, 103, pioneer in quality control, dies. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/03/business/03juran.html?_r=0
- Christensen, C., Johnson, C.W., & Horn, M.B. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Dweck, C.S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
- Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., Freeman, A. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
- Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., and Freeman, A. (2015). NMC Horizon Report: 2015 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
- Lave, J & Wenger, E (1990) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Moore, G.A. (1995). Crossing the chasm: Marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream customers. New York, NY: HarperBusiness. Richards, C. (1904, October, 6). A new name. Manual Training Magazine, 6(1), p32-33.
- Rogers, E. (1962). Diffusion of Innovation, New York: The Free Press.
- Vygotsky, L.S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978.
- Wyld, J. And Dierking, L.D. (2015), Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators, edited by Margaret Honey and David E. Kanter. Routledge, New York, NY
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.