You are here:

Brave New World: The use of popular social media for multimodal literary analysis PROCEEDINGS

, , Slippery Rock University, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Montreal, Quebec, Canada ISBN 978-1-939797-16-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

To engage deeply with the types of complex texts called for by Common Core, students need modern methods for literary analysis that connect to their life experiences. Building upon a background in digital and multimodal literacy, this article reflects on the use of Vine in the classroom for the analysis of Brave New World. Findings indicate that students, through the structured use of social media, were able to increase their engagement and understanding of this challenging text, as well as improve their ability to portray complex literary elements in multiple digital modes.

Citation

Hilton, J. & Oldakowski, T. (2015). Brave New World: The use of popular social media for multimodal literary analysis. In S. Carliner, C. Fulford & N. Ostashewski (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2015--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 935-943). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 18, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Alper, M., & Herr-Stephenson, R. (2013). Transmedia play: Literacy across media. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 5(2), 366-369.
  2. Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital literacy. In C. Lankshear& M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (pp. 17-32). New York: Peter Lang.
  3. Burbules, N.C. (1997). Rhetorics of the web: Hyperreading and critical literacy Retrieved December 27, 2012, from http://faculty.education.illinois.edu/burbules/papers/rhetorics.html
  4. Burbules, N.C., & Callister, T.A. (2000). Watch it: The risks and promises of information technologies for education. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
  5. Carusi, A. (2006). Textual practitioners: A comparison of hypertext theory and phenomenology of reading. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 5(2), 163-180.
  6. Das, R. (2011). Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre. European Journal of Communication, 26(4), 343-360.
  7. Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital Literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
  8. Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
  9. Hay, A. (2010). Hypernews, hyperreaders and beyond. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 13(3). Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0013.302Hilton,J.T.(2013).Pedagogyfor digital literacy: Advancing "hyperreading" skills in the classroom. Pennsylvania Teacher Educator, 12(1), 37-43.
  10. Hilton, J.T., & Canciello, J. (2013). Tablet English: Student perceptions of an iPad-based digital literacy curriculum. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 4(4), 1-14.
  11. Hobbs, R. (2011). Digital and media literacy: Connecting culture and classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  12. Huxley, A. (1989). Brave New World. New York: Harper& Row.
  13. Kist, W. (2010). The socially networked classroom: Teaching in the media age. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  14. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwenn, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design.. London: Routledge.
  15. Lewison, M., Flint, A.S., & Van Sluys, K. (2002). Taking on critical literacy: The journey of newcomers and novices. Language Arts, 79(5), 382-392.
  16. Livingstone, S. (2004). The challenge of changing audiences: Or, what is the audience researcher to do in the age of the Internet? European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 75-86.
  17. Mobrand, K.A., & Spyridakis, J.H. (2007). Explicitness of local navigational links: Comprehension, perceptions of use, and browsing behavior. Journal of Information Science, 33(1), 41-61.
  18. National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Search for public schools. Retrieved July 29, 2014, from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/ Oldakowski, T. (2014). A Multimodal Assignment That Enriches Literacy Learning. Insight Journal, 70(9), 70-77.
  19. Pensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
  20. Redmond, T. (2015). Media literacy is commonsense: Bridging common core standards with the media experiences of digital learners. Middle School Journal, 46(3), 10-17.
  21. Santo, R. (2013). Hacker literacies: User-generated resistance and reconfiguration of networked publics. In J. Avila & J.Z. Pandya (Eds.), Critical Digital Literacies as Social Praxis (pp. 197-218). New York: Peter Lang.
  22. Scherff, L. (2012). "This project has personally affected me": Developing a critical stance in preservice English teachers. Journal of Literary Research, 44(2), 200-236.
  23. Schmier, S.A. (2013). Designing space for student choice in a digital media studies classroom. In J. Avila & J.Z. Pandya (Eds.), Critical Digital Literacies as Social Praxis (pp. 15-40). New York: Peter Lang.
  24. Smith, A., & Hull, G. (2013). Critical literacies and social media: Fostering ethical engagement with global youth. In J. Avila & J.Z. Pandya (Eds.), Critical Digital Literacies as Social Praxis (pp. 63-86). New York: Peter
  25. Watulak, S.L., & Kinzer, C.K. (2013). Beyond technological skills: Toward a framework for critical digital literacies in pre-service teacher education. In J. Avila & J.Z. Pandya (Eds.), Critical Digital Literacies as Social Praxis (pp. 127-156). New York: Peter Lang.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.