You are here:

Using Participatory Professional Development to Impact TPCK
PROCEEDINGS

, , Indiana University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

With the growing ubiquity of online education and the push to foster connected learning and 21st century skills, new pedagogical practices are needed. Teachers must have access to professional development that helps them gain insight into the relationships between their technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge so that they can integrate new practices into their teaching. This paper introduces participatory professional development (PPD), a new professional development model that engages teachers in a participatory learning environment focused on understanding how digital technologies afford and constrain learning in online courses, and what pedagogical practices can be used to maximize their potential.

Citation

Itow, R. & Hickey, D. (2015). Using Participatory Professional Development to Impact TPCK. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3243-3250). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 21, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain, 33(8), 3–15.
  2. Borko, H., Michalec, P., Timmons, M., & Siddle, J. (1997). Student teaching portfolios: A tool for promoting reflective practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(5), 345–357.
  3. Brown, J.S., & Adler, R.P. (2008). Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0.(Author abstract)(Report). EDUCAUSE Review.
  4. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
  5. Engle, R.A., & Conant, F.R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483.
  6. Gee, J.P. (2003). Opportunity to learn: a language-based perspective on assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy& Practice, 10(1), 27–46.
  7. Gee, J.P., & Green, J.L. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119–169.
  8. Greeno, J.G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5.
  9. Greeno, J.G., Collins, A.M., & Resnick, L.B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In Berliner, D.C. & Calfee, R.C. (Eds.), (pp. 15–
  10. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. The Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942–1012.
  11. Guskey, T.R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381– 391.
  12. Hickey, D., & Rehak, A. (2013). Wikifolios and participatory assessment for engagement, understanding, and achievement in online courses. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 22(4), 407–441.
  13. Hickey, D.T., & Anderson, K.T. (2007). Situative approaches to student assessment: Contextualizing evidence to support practice. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Evidence and Decision Making, 106, 264–287.
  14. Hickey, D.T., Honeyford, M.A., Clinton, K.A., & McWilliams, J. (2010). Participatory assessment of 21st Century Proficiencies. In V.J. Schute & B. Becker (Eds.), Innovative assessment in the 21st century: Supporting educational needs. New York: Springer.
  15. Hickey, D.T., Honeyford, M.A., & McWilliams, J.C. (2012). Participatory assessment in a climate of accountability. In H. Jenkins& W. Kelly (Eds.), Reading in a participatory culture. New York Times: Teachers College Press.
  16. Hickey, D.T., & Itow, R.C. (2012). Participatory assessment for participatory teaching& Learning in school contexts. Designing with Teachers: Participatory Approaches to Professional Development, 78–88.
  17. Hickey, D.T., McWilliams, J.M., & Honeyford, M.A. (2011). Reading Moby-Dick in a participatory culture: Organizing assessment for engagement in a new media era. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(4), 247–273.
  18. Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Mit Press.
  19. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
  21. Penuel, W.R., Fishman, B.J., Cheng, B.H., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337.
  22. Penuel, W.R., Fishman, B.J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L.P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921 –958.
  23. Thomas, G., Wineburg, S., Grossman, P., Myhre, O., & Woolworth, S. (1998). In the company of colleagues: An interim report on the development of a community of teacher learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 21–32.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.