You are here:

e-TPCK: An Adaptive E-Learning Technology for the Development of Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge
PROCEEDINGS

, , , University of Cyprus, Cyprus

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

The authors herein discuss the design and implementation of e-TPCK, an adaptive e-learning environment that targets the development of teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK). The system deploys a technological solution that promotes teachers' ongoing TPCK development by engaging them in the design of learner-centered ICT-infused scenarios fostering a self-paced and personalized learning experience, while taking, at the same time, into account teachers’ diverse needs, information processing constraints, and preferences. The design of the system followed a design-based research methodology and was informed by different theoretical and methodological frameworks. The authors conclude with recommendations about how to improve the design of e-TPCK by incorporating built-in features to support adaptive scaffolding and self-regulatory processes in order to provide a complete personalized learning experience for the teacher.

Citation

Angeli, C., Mavroudi, A. & Christodoulou, A. (2015). e-TPCK: An Adaptive E-Learning Technology for the Development of Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3059-3064). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 22, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice teachers as ICT designers: An instructional design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 21(4), 292-302.
  2. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK). Computers& Education, 52, 154-168.
  3. Angeli, C., & Veletsianos, G. (2010). PAUL: An adaptive electronic learning environment to scaffold teacher expertise and ICT-related technological pedagogical content knowledge. In A. Tzavanari & N. Tsapatsoulis (Eds.), Affective, interactive and cognitive methods for eLearning design: Creating an optimal education experience (pp. 173-186). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  4. Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
  5. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
  6. Burgos, D., Tattersall, C., & Koper, E.J.R. (2006). Representing adaptive eLearning strategies in IMS Learning Design. In R. Koper& K. Stefanov (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop in Learning Networks for Lifelong Competence Development (pp. 54-60). Sofia, Bulgaria: TENCompetence
  7. De Bra, P., & Calvi, L. (1998). AHA! An open adaptive hypermedia architecture. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 4, 115-139.
  8. Design-Based Research Collective (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
  9. Edelson, D.C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sci-ences, 11(1), 105-121.
  10. Gilbert J.E., & Han C.Y. (1999). Adapting instruction in search of a significant difference. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 22, 149-160.
  11. Graham, C.R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers& Education, 57(3), 1953-1960.
  12. Greer, J., McCalla, G., Collins, J., Kumar, V., Meagher, P., & Vassileva, J. (1998). Supporting peer help and collaboration in distributed workplace environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9, 159-177.
  13. Hook, K., Karlgren, J., Waern, A., Dahlback, N., Jansson, C.G., Karlgren, K., & Lemaire, B. (1998). A glass box approach to adaptive hypermedia. In P. Brusilovsky et al. (Eds.), Adaptive hypertext and hypermedia (pp. 143-170). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  14. Hunkins, F. (1995). Teaching thinking through effective questioning (2nd ed.). Norwood, MA: Christopher Gordon.
  15. Kavcic, A., Privosnik, M., Marolt, M., & Divjak, S. (2002). Educational hypermedia system ALICE: An evaluation of adaptive features. Proceedings of a workshop on Advances in Multimedia, Video and Signal Processing Systems, pp. 71-76.
  16. Melis, E., Andrès, E., Büdenbender, J., Frishauf, A., Goguadse, G., Libbrecht, P., Pollet, M., & Ullrich, C. (2001). ActiveMath: A web-based learning environment. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12(4), 385-407.
  17. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  18. Niess, M.L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523.
  19. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J.E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P.W. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 63-71.
  20. Paul, R. (1990). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
  21. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  22. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
  23. Shute, V., & Towle, B. (2003). Adaptive e-learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(2), 105-114.
  24. Slotta, J.D., & Linn, M.C. (2000). The knowledge integration environment: Helping students use the internet effectively. In M.J. Jacobson& R.B. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 193 – 226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.