You are here:

Using Blended Learning Approach in Pre-service Technology Integration Courses
PROCEEDINGS

, Northern Illinois University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Full Text

Abstract

Blended learning shows multiple benefits when it comes to student learning. Previous research revealed that the use of blended learning in the classroom strengthens student higher order thinking skills, improves student engagement and provides opportunities for self-improvement. Little research has been conducted on the use of blended learning in pre-service technology integration courses. In order to prepare future teachers for technology powered world, it is important to expose and provide them with blended learning experience. Research is needed to study student and instructor experiences with blended learning in technology integration courses to help better understand how to maximize student learning and involvement and to prepare students for their professional pursuits.

Citation

Ketsman, O. (2015). Using Blended Learning Approach in Pre-service Technology Integration Courses. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2417-2419). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved April 7, 2020 from .

© 2015 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Ausburn, L. (2004). Course design elements most valued by adult learners in blended online education environments: An American perspective. Educational Media International, 41 (4), 327-337.
  2. Drysdale, J., Graham, C., Spring, K., & Halverson, L. (2013). An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 2 (17), 90-100.
  3. Garrison, R. & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95-105.
  4. Garrison, R. & Vaughan, H. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles and guidelines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Gerbic, P. (2011). Teaching using a blended approach-what does the literature tell us? Educational Media International 48 (3), 221-234.
  6. Hastie, M., Hung, I., Chen, N., & Kinshuk (2010). A blended synchronous learning model for educational international collaboration. Innovations in Education and teaching International, 47 (1), 9-24.
  7. Holley, D., & Dobson, C. (2008). Encouraging student engagement in a blended learning environment: The use of contemporary learning spaces. Learning Media and Technology, 33 (2), 139-150.
  8. Mosca, J., Ball, D., Buzza, J., & Paul, D. (2010). A comprehensive student-based analysis of hybrid courses: Student Preferences and design criteria for success. Journal of business and Economics Research, 8 (5), 7-22.
  9. Osguthorpe, R., & Graham, C. (2003). Blended learning environments. Definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4 (3), 227-233.
  10. Schumann, R., & Skopek, T. (2009). Blurring the lines: A blended learning model in a graduate public administration program. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10 (2), 219-232.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Slides