You are here:

Teacher Efficacy in 1:1 Tablet Integration: Year 2
PROCEEDINGS

, , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This poster provides an update on the ongoing research in a one-to-one table initiative at an urban middle school in the southeastern United States. Expanding upon the work presented at SITE 2014, this poster presents findings from two additional iterative cycles and the resultant lessons created by teachers after content-specific professional development designed to help teachers consider TPACK. Observational data and teachers’ lesson designs will be shared to illustrate that although issues of teachers’ efficacy with technology and TPACK integration still exist, slight changes in teachers’ practice are evident. Researchers hope to generate conversations around facilitating changes in teachers’ efficacy and classroom practices in regard to one-to-one initiatives.

Citation

Minshew, L. & Anderson, J. (2015). Teacher Efficacy in 1:1 Tablet Integration: Year 2. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1679-1684). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141– 178.
  2. Ertmer, P. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61. Doi:10.1007/BF02299597
  3. Ertmer, P.A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
  4. Fleischer, H. (2012). What is our current understanding of one-to-one computer projects: A systematic narrative research review. Educational Research Review, 7, 107-122.
  5. Greaves, T., Hayes, J., Wilson, L., Gielniak, M., & Peterson, R. (2012). Revolutionizing education through technology: The project RED roadmap for transformation. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/learn/publications/books/projectred Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers and Education, 51(4), 1499-1509.
  6. Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2013). The acceptance of Tablet-PCs in classroom instruction: The teachers’ perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 525-534.
  7. Kim, C., Kim, M.K., Lee, C., Spector, J.M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76-85. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.tate.2012.08.005
  8. Koehler, M., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T., & Graham, C. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In J.M. Spector, M.D. Merrill, J. Elen& M.J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 101-111). New York: Springer.
  9. Lipponen, L. (2002). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, Boulder, Colorado, 72-81.
  10. Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrated computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers and Education, 51(4), 1523-1537. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2008.02.003
  11. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  12. Paraskeva, F., Bouta, H., & Papagianni, A. (2006). Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computers and Education, 50(3), 1084-1091. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2006.10.006
  13. Penuel, W.R. (2006). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 329-348.
  14. Schoenfeld, A.H. (2006). What doesn’t work; The challenge and failure of the What Works clearinghouse to conduct meaningful reviews of studies of mathematics curricula. Educational Researcher, 35(2), 13-21.
  15. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.