You are here:

Implementing Mobile Learning in a Hawai`i Middle School with a Real World Math Application

, , University of Hawaii, United States ; , Univ. of Hawaii, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in New Orleans, LA, USA ISBN 978-1-939797-12-4 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA


This paper reports a case study of a middle school math teacher in the Hawai`i Department of Education (HDOE) developing creative and successful mobile learning opportunities for students by integrating iPads in her math class. The data collected from the teacher through multiple methods showed noticeable positive changes in the teacher’s attitude toward mobile technology, as well as in her students’ behaviors and their test scores between before and after the iPad implementation. Discussed is how the iPads triggered positive changes in teaching and learning. The results suggested that the use of the device was worth consideration and research in similar contexts.


Fulford, C., Iyoda, R. & Ho, C. (2014). Implementing Mobile Learning in a Hawai`i Middle School with a Real World Math Application. In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning (pp. 607-615). New Orleans, LA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 27, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Attard, C., & Curry, C. (2012). Exploring the use of iPads to engage young students with mathematics. Retrieved from & Id=1933
  2. Boulay, R. (2008). Faculty mentoring program to incorporate new technology into college courses: Statewide findings. University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI.
  3. Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., & Maguire, P. (2003). Why action research? Action Research, 1(1), 9–28.
  4. Desimone, L.M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
  5. Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012). NMC horizon report: 2012 K-12 edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from Keengwe, J., Pearson, D., & Smart, K. (2009). Technology integration: Mobile devices (iPods), constructivist pedagogy, and student learning. AACE Journal, 17(4), 333–346.
  6. Leong, P., Ho, C., & Iyoda, R. (2011). Online interactions for student satisfaction: Going online to increase Math& Science teachers in Hawaii. Global Learn AsiaPacific 2011, 2011(1), 1996–2001.
  7. Lewis, M.S., Zhao, J., & Montclare, J.K. (2012). Development and implementation of high school chemistry modules using touch-screen technologies. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(8), 1012–1018.
  8. Lin, M.-F., Fulford, C.P., Ho, C.P., Iyoda, R., & Ackerman, L.K. (2012). Possibilities and challenges in mobile learning for K-12 teachers: A pilot retrospective survey study. In Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (WMUTE), 2012 IEEE Seventh International Conference (pp. 132 –136).
  9. McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2011). All you need to know about action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
  10. Reid, D., & Ostashewski, N. (2011). IPads in the classroom– new technologies, old issues: Are they worth the effort? World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2011(1), 1689–1694.
  11. Sugar, W. (2005). Instructional technologist as a coach: Impact of a situated professional development program on teachers’ technology use. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 547–571.
  12. West, C. (2011). Action research as a professional development activity. Arts Educational Policy Review, 112, 89–

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact