You are here:

Learner Perceptions on the Use of Mobile Learning Strategies and Devices for Team e-portfolio Content Creation

, , Boise State University, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in New Orleans, LA, USA ISBN 978-1-939797-12-4 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA


This study intended to determine student perceptions on the efficacy of using mobile learning strategies and devices to create electronic content for inclusion in an engineering team/group e-portfolio. Sixty four students from an undergraduate engineering thermodynamics class, created multimedia videos and produced content demonstrating course content summaries, problem solving techniques, and written work on concept question solutions. Results from a post course completion anonymous survey and focus group meeting indicated that the majority of the students found this to be a very useful exercise in learning, communicating with their instructor, completing homework and assignments as well as to prepare for tests. Some students indicated their preference for use of traditional computers, paper and pen. Recommendations for improved pedagogy using mobile devices are provided. Further research plans include the creation of an engineering industry grounded assessment instrument capable of m


Bose, D. & Pakala, K. (2014). Learner Perceptions on the Use of Mobile Learning Strategies and Devices for Team e-portfolio Content Creation. In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning (pp. 242-251). New Orleans, LA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 19, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Basoglu, E.B., & Akdemir, O. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students’ English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flashcards. The Turkish Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 1-7.
  2. Benedict, L., & Pence, H. (2012). Teaching Chemistry using student-created videos and photo blogs accessed with smartphones and two-dimensional barcodes. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 492-496.
  3. Chang, C., Chatterjea, K., Goh, D.H., Theng, Y.L., Lim, E., Sun, A., Razikin, K., Kim, T.N.Q., & Nguyen, Q.M. (2012). Lessons from learner experiences in a field-based inquiry in geography using mobile devices. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 21 (1), 41-58.
  4. Chickering, A.W., & Gamson, Z.F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 39 (7), 3-7.
  5. Crouch, C.H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69 (9), 970-977.
  6. Day, J.M., & Kumar, M. (2010). Using SMS text messaging to create individualized and interactive experiences in large classes: A beer game example. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 8 (1), 129-136.
  7. Demouy, V., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2010). On the spot: Using mobile devices for listening and speaking practice on a French language programme. Open Learning, 25 (3), 217-232.
  8. Dunn, P.K., Richardson, A., McDonald, C., & Oprescu, F. (2012). Instructor perceptions of using mobile-phonebased free classroom response system in first-year statistics undergraduate courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43 (8), 1041-1056.
  9. Fagen, A.P., Crouch, C.H. & Mazur, E. (2002). Peer instruction: Results from a range of classrooms. The Physics Teacher, 40, 206-209.
  10. Felder, R.M., & Brent, R. (2003). Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria. Journal of Engineering Education, 92 (1), 7-25.
  11. Fisher, M., & Baird, D.E. (2006). Making mLearning work: Utilizing mobile technology for active exploration, collaboration, assessment, and reflection in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(1), 3-30.
  12. Haughton, N.A., & Keil, V.L (2009). Engaging with faculty to develop, implement, and pilot electronic performance assessments of student teachers using mobile devices. The Teacher Educator, 44, 275-284.
  13. Pereira, J., Echeazarra, L., Sanz-Santamaria, S., & Gutierrez, J. (2014). Student-generated online videos to develop cross-curricular and curricular competencies in Nursing studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 580590.
  14. Jain, A., & Farley, A. (2012). Mobile phone-based audience response system and student engagement in large-group teaching. Economic Papers, 31 (4), 428-439.
  15. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  16. Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20. DOI:10.3402/rlt.v20i0/14406.
  17. Kinsella, S. (2009). Many to one: Using the mobile phone to interact with large classes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (5), 956-958.
  18. Liaw, S., Hatala, M., & Huang, H. (2010). Investigating acceptance toward mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: Based on activity theory approach. Computers& Education, 54, 446-454.
  19. Little, B. (2012). Effective and efficient mobile learning: Issues and tips for developers. Industrial and Commercial Training, 44 (7), 402-407.
  20. Martin, F., & Ertzberger, J. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Computers& Education, 68, 76-85.
  21. Stefanou, C., Hoffman, L., & Vielee, N. (2008). Note-taking in the college classroom as evidence of generative learning. Learning Environments Research, 11, 1-17.
  22. Tabor, S.W., & Minch, R.P. (2013). Student adoption& Development of digital learning media: Action research and recommended practices. Journal of Information Technology Educational Research, 12, 203-223.
  23. Thornton, P. & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 217-228.
  24. Ting, Y. (2012). The pitfalls of mobile devices in learning: A different view and implications for pedagogical design, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(2), 119-134.
  25. Wagner, M., & Gansemer-Topf, A (2005). Learning by teaching others: A qualitative study exploring the benefits of peer teaching. Landscape Journal, 24 (2), 198-208.
  26. Wang, M., Shen, R., Novak, D., & Pan, X. (2009). The impact of mobile learning on students’ learning behaviors and performance: Report from a large blended classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 673-695.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact