You are here:

Adapting Teaching/Learning Strategies for the Multigenerational Online Classroom
PROCEEDINGS

, , Arkansas State University, United States

AACE Award

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in New Orleans, LA, USA ISBN 978-1-939797-12-4 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Abstract

Adapting teaching/learning strategies appropriate for the multigenerational online classroom is a challenge for educators. The pedagogy found in the online classroom shifts the focus from a teacher-centered learning approach to a student-centered learning approach. Four generations of students who could be present in the online classroom are identified and described. Literature reveals that each generation has its own set of values, ideas, beliefs, expectations, ethics, and culture. Educators must understand these differences in order to better understand the learning needs of the students to provide various teaching/learning strategies to promote optimal student outcomes. This paper will briefly discuss the differences among the four generations, address the learning needs of the four generations, and present examples of generation appropriate teaching/learning strategies in the online classroom.

Citation

Baker, D. & Schmidt, A. (2014). Adapting Teaching/Learning Strategies for the Multigenerational Online Classroom. In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning (pp. 130-138). New Orleans, LA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 16, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Billings, D. & Kowalski, K. (2004). Teaching learners from varied generations. The Journal of Continuing Education, 35 (3), 104-105.
  2. Billings, D.M., Skiba, D.J. & Connors, H.R. (2005). Best practices in web-based courses: Generational differences across undergraduate and graduate nursing students. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21 (2), 126-133.
  3. Cantrell, S.W., O’Leary, P., Ward, K.S. (2008). Strategies for success in online learning. Nursing Clinics of North America, 43 (4), 547-555.
  4. Ferris, S.P. (2009). Teaching and learning with the net generation. Presentation at the Lilly East Conference.
  5. Garcia, P. & Qin, J. (2007). Identifying the generation gap in higher education: Where do the differences lie? Journal of Online Education, 3 (4). Retrieved from http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol3_issue4/Identifying_the_Generation_Gap_in_Higher_Education__Where_Do_the_Differences_Really_Lie_.pdf
  6. Gibson, S.E. (2009). Intergenerational communication in the classroom: Recommendations for successful teacherstudent relationships. Nursing Education Perspectives. 30 (1), 37-39.
  7. Hallas, J. (2008). Rethinking teaching and assessment strategies for flexible learning environments. Proceedings Ascilite Melbourne. Hannay, M. & Fretwell, C. (nd). The higher education workplace: Meeting the needs of multiple generations. Research in Higher Education Journal.
  8. Howe, N.N. & Strauss, W. (2012). What is a generation. Lifecourse Associates, retrieved from http://www.lifecourse.com/
  9. Johanson, L. (2012). Teaching the millennial generation: Considerations for nurse educators. Nurse Educator, 37 (4), 173-176.
  10. Johnson, S.J. & Romanello, M.L. (2005). Generational diversity: Teaching and learning approaches. Nurse Educator, 30 (5), 212-216.
  11. Ke, F. & Kwak, D. (2013). Constructs of student-centered online learning satisfaction of a diverse online student body: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48 (1), 97-122.
  12. Marconi, M.A. (2012). What about me? Addressing generational diversity. Retrieved from http://www.rochester.edu/diversity/assets/pdf/annualconference/Workshop%20C2-%20Schlegel%20207-%20Maria%20Marconi.pdf
  13. McCraw M.A. & Martindale, T. (2012). Instructing multi-generational students. Paper University of Memphis.
  14. McDonald, M.E. (2014). The Nurse Educator’s Guide to Assessing Learning Outcomes. Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning.
  15. Notarianni, M.A., Curry-Lourenco, K., Barham, P., & Palmer, K. (2009). Engaging learners across generations: The Progressive Professional Development Model. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 40 (6), 261266.
  16. Parker, E.B. & Wassef, M.E. (2010). Flexible online learning options for graduate nursing students. Nurse Educator, 35 (6), 243-247.
  17. Schell, G.P. & Janicki, T.J. (2012). Online course pedagogy and the constructivist learning model. Journal of the Southern Association for Information Systems, 1 (1), 26-36.
  18. Smuncy, D. (2010). Bridging multigenerational gaps in the online classroom. Online Learning Magazine for UMUC Faculty retrieved from http://deoracle.org/online-pedagogy/teaching-strategies/bridging-multigenerationalgaps-in-the-online-classroom.html
  19. Wright, G.B. (2011). Student-centered learning in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23 (3), 92-97.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.