In Search of Educational, Socio-cultural, and Technological Criteria for Localizing Learning Solutions for Varying Cultural Contexts
Tiina Mäkelä, University of Jyväskylä, Finland ; Bradley Young, Zayed University, United Arab Emirates ; Jan Pawlowski, Ruhr West University of Applied Sciences, Germany
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Tampere, Finland ISBN 978-1-939797-08-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
Despite the acknowledged necessity of localizing learning solutions developed in one cultural context in order to meet the demands of the target culture/s, the question of how to do it in practice remains unclear. This panel will first present a set of educational, socio-cultural, and technological criteria developed to evaluate localization needs in varying cultural contexts. Second, it discusses how localization should also consider the cultural diversity within a country. Third, the panel reminds of an urgent need for adapting learning solutions into cross-border and inter-cultural settings. Debate is provoked, in particular, by comparing previously proposed localization requirements for Australia, Finland, Germany, Spain, South Korea, and the United Arab Emirates with panelists’ knowledge of these countries. Finally, opportunities are given to deepen understanding of the localization requirements of these countries and to propose alternative criteria for localization.
Mäkelä, T., Young, B. & Pawlowski, J. (2014). In Search of Educational, Socio-cultural, and Technological Criteria for Localizing Learning Solutions for Varying Cultural Contexts. In J. Viteli & M. Leikomaa (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2014--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 2592-2595). Tampere, Finland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 25, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/147846/.
© 2014 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
- Baskerville, R.F. (2003). Hofstede Never Studied Culture, Accounting, Organizations and Society 28 (pp. 114).
- Dhindsa, H.S. (2007) Cultural Dimensions of the Learning Environment in Brunei, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 6, (pp. 251-265).
- Esselink, B. (2003). The Evolution of Localization, Multilingual Computing and Technology 2003 (pp. 21-29).
- Fisher, D.L. & Waldrip, B.G. (1999). Cultural Factors of Science Classroom Learning Environments, TeacherStudent Interactions and Student Outcomes, Research in Science& Technological Education, 17:1 (pp. 83-96).
- Henderson, L. (1996). Instructional Design of Interactive Multimedia: A Cultural Critique, Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 44, No. 4 (pp. 85-104).
- Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural Differences in Teaching and Learning, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 10 (pp. 301-320).
- Kersten, G.E., Kersten, M.A., & Rakowski, W.M. (2002). Software and Culture: beyond internationalization of the interface, Journal of Global Information Management, InterNeg Report INR01/02.
- Minkov, M. & Hofstede, G. (2011). The Evolution of Hofstede’s doctrine, Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal Vol. 18 No 1.
- Munro-Smith, N. (2002). A Tale of Two Cities: computer mediated teaching and learning in Melbourne and Singapore. In Winds of change in the sea of learning: proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE): 8-11 December 2002.
- Mushtaha, A. & De Troyer, O. (2007). Cross-Cultural Understanding of Content and Interface in the Context of E-Learning Systems, Usability and Internationalization, Part I, HCII 2007, LNCS 4559, (pp. 164-173).
- Richter, T. & Pawlowski, J.M. (2007). The Need for Standardization of Context Metadata for e-Learning Environments, Proceeding of e-ASEM Conference, Seoul, Korea, October 2007.
- Signorini, P., Wiesemes, R. & Murphy, R. (2009). Developing Alternative Frameworks for Exploring Intercultural Learning: a critique of Hofstede’s cultural difference model, Teaching in Higher Education, 14: 3 (pp. 253-264).
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.