Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Jacksonville, Florida, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-07-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA
Despite debates about the specific parameters of its eight subcomponents, TPACK is generally understood within university-based teacher education communities as the knowledge needed to incorporate technologies—especially digital tools and resources—effectively in teaching and learning. How do professional development providers working within primary and secondary schools and districts conceptualize and operationalize TPACK? Our study of educational technology-related professional development in seven North American schools and districts in seven states/provinces found that educational leaders’ discussion and implementation of the TPACK construct differs from that of university-based researchers in intriguing and important ways. In these organizations, TPACK was both appropriated to reconnect curriculum and pedagogy with educational technology use after prior technocentric professional development was found to be lacking, and reconceptualized to focus more upon practice than knowledge.
Harris, J. & Hofer, M. (2014). The Construct is in the Eye of the Beholder: School Districts’ Appropriations and Reconceptualizations of TPACK. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2519-2526). Jacksonville, Florida, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 24, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/131164/.
© 2014 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
- Cox, S., & Graham, C.R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends, 53(5), 60-69.
- Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2013, March). Got research? TPACK eNewsletter update. Presentation at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE) Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA.
- Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2014, April). “TPACK stories:” Schools and school districts repurposing a theoretical construct for technology-related professional development. Paper session presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
- Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2005). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94-102.
- Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T.S., & Graham, C.R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In J.M. Spector, M.D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M.J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications in technology (pp. 101-111). New York: Springer.
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
- Papert, S. (1987). A critique of technocentrism in thinking about the school of the future. Retrieved October 17, 2008, from http://www.papert.org/articles/ACritiqueofTechnocentrism.html
- Porras-Hernandez, L.H. & Salinas-Amescua, B. (2013). Strengthening TPACK: A broader notion of context and the use of teachers’ narratives to reveal knowledge construction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48, 223-244. Doi: 10.2190/EC.48.2.f
- Riessman, C.K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
- Thompson, A.D., & Mishra, P. (2007). Breaking news: TPCK becomes TPACK!. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(2), 38.
- Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Roblin, N.P., Tondeur, J., & Van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge– A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109-121. Doi:10.1111/J.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.