You are here:

Effective Technology Integration in the Secondary English Classroom: A Planning Guide for Teachers
PROCEEDINGS

, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Jacksonville, Florida, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-07-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

The theoretical underpinnings, research, and rationale behind a planning guide designed to help secondary English teachers effectively integrate technology into instruction will be presented. The guide, which includes seven teacher planning prompts, relevant research summaries, Common Core English Language Arts standards, and best practice exemplars, will also be shared. This brief paper will allow participants to think critically about this tool that allows teachers to plan lessons that fully embody TPACK (Mishra & Koehler, 2006).

Citation

Caprino, K. (2014). Effective Technology Integration in the Secondary English Classroom: A Planning Guide for Teachers. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1969-1973). Jacksonville, Florida, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 22, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bailey, N.M. (2009). ‘It makes it more read’: Teaching new literacies in a secondary English classroom. English Education, 41(3), 207-234.
  2. Bull, G., Bell, R., Mason, C., & Garofalo, J. (2002). Elementary/secondary education. In H.H. Adelsberger, B. Collis, and J.M. Pawlowski (Eds.), Handbook on information technologies for education and training (pp. 543-555). New York: Springer.
  3. Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 319346.
  4. Ertmer, P.A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.
  5. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J.E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38(4),246-259.
  6. Hammond, T.C., & Manfra, M.M. (2009). Giving, prompting, making: Aligning technology and pedagogy within TPACK for social studies instruction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 9(2). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss2/socialstudies/article1.cfm Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J.D., & Smaldino, S.E. (2002). Instructional mediated technologies for learning. Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.
  7. Hofer, M., & Owings-Swan, K. (2005). Digital moviemaking—the harmonization of technology, pedagogy and content. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning,1(2), 102-110.
  8. Hughes, J.E. (2000). Teaching English with technology: Exploring teacher learning and practice. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9985399).
  9. Hughes, J.E. (2004). Technology learning principles for preservice and in-service teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(3), 345362.
  10. Hughes, J.E. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences informing technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277-302.
  11. Hughes, J.E. & Scharber, C. (2008). Leveraging the development of English TPCK within the deictic nature of literacy. In J.A. Colbert et al. (Eds.) Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators, New York: Routledge.
  12. International Society for Technology. (2000). ISTE national educational technology standards (NETS) and performance indicators for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/nets_for_teachers_2000.pdf?sfvrsn=2 McEneaney, J.E. (2011). Web 3.0, litbots, and TPWSGWTAU. Journal of Adolescent& Adult Literacy, 54(5), 376-378.
  13. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  14. Pasternak, D. (2007). Is Technology Used as Practice? A Survey Analysis of Preservice English Teachers’ Perceptions and Classroom Practices. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 140-157. AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/ P/24232
  15. Pierson, M.E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 413-430.
  16. Puentedura, R.R. (2009). SAMR: A contextualized introduction. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/01/15/SAMRABriefContextualizedInTroduction.pdf
  17. Robyler, M.D. & Doering, A.H. (2010). Integrating educational technology into teaching. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
  18. Sahin, I. (2011). Development of survey of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 97-105.
  19. Swenson, J., Rozema, R., Young, C.A., McGrail, E., & Whitin, P. (2005). Beliefs about technology and the preparation of English teachers: Beginning the conversation. Technology and Teacher Education, 5(3/4), 210-236.
  20. Young, C.A. & Bush, J. (2004). Teaching the English language arts with technology: A critical approach and pedagogical framework. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Education, 4(1), 122.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides