You are here:

Investigating distinctive pedagogies in mobile learning
PROCEEDINGS

, University of Technology, Sydney (UTS), Australia, Australia ; , The University of Hull, United Kingdom

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Jacksonville, Florida, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-07-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This international study investigates how teachers are exploiting distinctive pedagogical features of mobile learning: collaboration, personalization and authenticity (Kearney, Schuck, Burden & Aubusson, 2012). The researchers developed a survey instrument based on these three established constructs, and used it to interrogate current mobile learning practices in school education. Findings indicated that teacher perceptions of authenticity were high but aspects of collaboration and student agency were rated lower than expected. Implications for effective use of handheld devices in teaching are addressed.

Citation

Matthew, K. & Burden, K. (2014). Investigating distinctive pedagogies in mobile learning. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1673-1680). Jacksonville, Florida, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 27, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Anderson, T.D. (2013). Tweens and their in-betweens: Giving voice to young people when exploring emerging information practices associated with smart devices. Information Research, 18(1), paper 565. Retrieved 17 October 2013 from http://InformationR.net/ir/18-1/paper565.html
  2. Bjerede, M., & Bondi, T. (2012). Learning is personal; Stories of android tablet use in the 5th Grade. A Learning Untethered project. Retrieved 16 Octobert 2013 from http://www.learninguntethered.com/wpcontent/uploads/2012/08/Learning-is-Personal.pdf
  3. Burden, K., Hopkins, P., Male, T., Martin, S., & Trala, C. (2012). IPad Scotland evaluation. Faculty of Education, The University of Hull, UK. Retrieved 10 February 2013 from http://www2.hull.ac.uk/ifl/ipadresearchinschools.aspx Burden, K., & Male, T. (2013). Edinburgh 1:1 Mobile Evaluation, 2012-2013. The University of Hull
  4. Churchill, D., Fo, B., & King, M. (2012). Study of affordances of iPads and teachers’ private theories. International Journal of Information and Educational Technology, 2(3), 251-254.
  5. Crooks, C. (1999). Computers in the community of classrooms. In K. Littleton, & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers. Analysing productive interaction (102-117). London: Routledge.
  6. Goodwin, K. (2012). Use of tablet technology in the classroom. NSW Department of Education and Communities. Retrieved 10 February 2013 from http://rde.nsw.edu.au/files/iPad_Evaluation_Sydney_Region.pdf Heinrich, P. (2012). The iPad as a tool for education: A study of the introduction of iPads at Longfield Academy, Kent. NAACE. Retrieved from http://www.naace.co.uk/publications/longfieldipadresearch
  7. Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012). NMC Horizon Report: 2012 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  8. Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology 20: 14406-DOI:10.3402/rlt.v20i0/14406
  9. Kress, G. & Pachler, N. (2007). Thinking about the ‘m’ in m-Learning. In N. Pachler (Ed.), Mobile learning: towards a research agenda (pp. 7-32). London: WLE Centre, Institute of Education.
  10. Ling, R., & Donner, J. (2009) Mobile communications. Polity, London.
  11. Melhuish, K. & Falloon, G. (2010). Looking to the future: M-learning with the iPad. Computers in New Zealand Schools: Learning, Leading, Technology, 22(3).
  12. Mills, K. (2010) Shrek meets Vygotsky: Rethinking adolescents' multimodal literacy practices in schools. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 54(1), pp. 35-41.
  13. Murray, O., & Olcese, N. (2011). Teaching and learning with ipads: Ready or not? TechTrends, 55(6), 42-48
  14. Pegrum, M., Oakley, G., & Faulkner, R. (2013). Schools going mobile: A study of the adoption of mobile handheld technologies in Western Australian independent schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 66-81.
  15. Royle, K., & Hadfield, M (2012). From ‘posh pen and pad’ to participatory pedagogies: One story of a Netbook implementation project with 108 Pupils in two primary schools. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 4(1), 1-17.
  16. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews& C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of e-learning research. (pp. 221–224). London: Sage.
  17. Traxler, J. (2009). Learning in a mobile age. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 1(1), 1–12.
  18. Tubin, D. (2006). Typology of ICT Implementation and Technology Applications. Computers in the Schools, 23(1), 8598. Retrieved October 15, 2013 from http://www.editlib.org/p/98971. Wertsch, J.V. 1991. Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.