#
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Pre-service Teachers’ Perception and Beliefs in Mathematics
PROCEEDINGS

## Cheng-Yao Lin, Southern Illinois University, United States ; Yu-Chun Kuo, Jackson State University, United States ; Yi-Yin Ko, Indiana State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Jacksonville, Florida, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-07-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

## Abstract

This study focuses on elementary pre-service teachers’ content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and technological pedagogical content knowledge of linear and quadratic equations. The relationships among Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) sub-scales and the effect of demographic variables on TPACK were examined. Participants included 79 pre-service from two mathematical courses, the content course and the methods course. Data were collected using a paper-based survey, and analyzed through quantitative techniques. Results indicated that pre-service teachers in the teacher education program had better pedagogical knowledge than those in the university core program. The five sub-scales of the algebra content were significantly correlated with each other. Levels of technology skills had a significant impact on pre-service teachers’ technology knowledge, technological content knowledge and TPACK.

## Citation

Lin, C.Y., Kuo, Y.C. & Ko, Y.Y. (2014). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Pre-service Teachers’ Perception and Beliefs in Mathematics. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1422-1431). Jacksonville, Florida, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 24, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/130966/.

© 2014 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

## References

- Alcock, L., & Simpson, A. (2004). Convergence of sequences and series: Interactions between visual reasoning and “best deal” problem. In J. Kaput, D. Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the Early Grades (pp. 273-301).
- Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010). Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Retrieved December 10, 2011, from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf Chang, C.Y. (2002). Does computer-assisted instruction+ problem solving= improved science outcomes? A pioneer study. The Journal of Educational Research, 95, 143-150.
- Doerr, H. (2001). Learning algebra with technology: The affordances and constraints of two environments. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, & J. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the twelfth study conferences of the International Commission on Mathematical Instruction: The future of the teaching and learning of algebra (Vol. 1, pp. 199-206). Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: The University of Melbourne.
- Doerr, H.M., & Pratt, D. (2007). The learning of mathematics and mathematical modeling in the context of technology. In M.K. Heid & G.W. Blume (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Syntheses, cases, and perspectives. Vol. 1: Research syntheses. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
- Doerr, H.M., & Zangor, R. (1999). The teacher, the task and the tool: The emergence of classroom norms. The International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 6, 267-279.
- Doerr, H.M., & Zangor, R. (2000). Creating meaning for and with the graphing calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 143-163.
- Falkner, K.P., Levi, L., & Carpenter, T.P. (1999). Children’s understanding of equality: A foundation for algebra. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6(4), 56-60.
- Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine Publishing Company.
- Graham, A., & Thomas, M. (2000). Building a versatile understanding of algebraic variables with a graphic calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(3), 265-282.
- Hazzan, O. (2000). Attitudes of prospective high school mathematics teachers toward technology integrating information technologies into their future teaching. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Services No. ED493688.)
- Hershkowitz, R. (1990). Psychological aspects of learning geometry. In P. Nesher & J. Kilpatrick (Eds), Mathematics and Cognition (pp. 70-95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hill, H.C., Ball, D.L., & Schilling, S.G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 372-400.
- Hoyles, C., Noss, R., & Kent, P. (2004). On the integration of digital technologies into mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9, 309-326.
- Isiksal, M., & Askar, P. (2005) The effect of spreadsheet and dynamic geometry software on the achievement and self-efficacy of 7th-grade students. Educational Research, 47(3), 333-350.
- Jan, S.J., & Tsai, M.F. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers& Education, 59, 327-338.
- Janvier, C. (1987). Representation and understanding: the notion of function as an example. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 67-71). Hillsdale, NJ:
- Kaput, J.J. (1987). Towards a theory of symbol use in mathematics. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 159-195). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Kaput, J.J. (1989). Supporting concrete visual thinking in multiplicative reasoning: Difficulties and opportunities. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11(1), 35-47.
- Kendal, M., & Stacey, K. (1999). Varieties of teacher privileging for teaching calculus with computer algebra systems. The International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 6(4), 233-247.
- Kersaint, G. (2007). Toward technology integration in mathematics education: A technology-integration course planning assignment. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(4), 256-278.
- Kersaint, G., Horton, B., Stohl, H., & Garofalo, J. (2003). Technology beliefs and practices of mathematics education faculty. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(4), 567-595.
- Kieran, C. (1981) Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 317-326.
- Kieran, C., & Sfard, A. (1999). Seeing through symbols: the case of equivalent expressions. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 21(1). 1-17.
- Knuth, E.J., Stephens, A.C., McNeil, N.M., & Alibali, M.W. (2006). Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(4), 297-312.
- Koehler, M.J. & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for teaching and teacher educators, 3-29. New York: Routledge.
- Küchemann, D. (1981). Algebra. In Hart, K. (Ed.), Children’s understanding of mathematics: 11-16 (pp. 102-109). London: John Murray.
- Lannin, J. (2005). Generalization and justification: The challenge of introducing algebraic reasoning through patterning activities. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(3), 231-258.
- Larkin, K., Jamieson-Proctor, R., & Finger, G. (2012). TPACK and pre-service teacher mathematics education: Defining a signature pedagogy for mathematics eEducation using ICT and based on the metaphor “mathematics is a language.” Computers in the Schools, 29, 207-226.
- Lavy, I. (2007). A case study of dynamic visualization and problem solving. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(8), 1075–1092.
- Levine, T. (1994). A computer-based program can make a difference: The case of the Rediscover Science program. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20, 283-296.
- Looi, C.K., & Lim, K.S. (2009). From bar diagrams to letter-symbolic algebra: A technology-enabled bridging. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 358–374.
- McCoy, L.P. (1991). The effect of geometry tool software on high school geometry achievement. Journal of Computers in Mathematics& Science Teaching, 10, 51-57.
- Meagher, M., Ozgun-Koca, S.A., & Edwards, M.T. (2011). Preservice teachers’ experiences with advanced digital technologies: The interplay between technology in a preservice classroom and in field placements. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(3), 243-270.
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teachers’ knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
- National Council of Teacher of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standard for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2009). Focus in high school mathematics: Reasoning and sensemaking. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
- Nwabueze, K.K. (2006). Technology class format versus traditional class format in undergraduate algebra. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 15(1), 79-93.
- Olkun, S., Altun, A., Smith, G. (2005). Computers and 2D geometric learning of Turkish fourth and fifth graders. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36 (2), 317-326.
- Pinto, M.M.F., & Tall, D. (1999). Student constructions of formal theories: Giving and extracting meaning. Proceedings of the Twenty-third conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, 281-288). Haifa, Israel.
- Philipp, R.A. (2008). Motivating prospective elementary school teachers to learn mathematics by focusing upon children’s mathematical thinking. Issues in Teacher Education, 17(2), 7-26.
- Pugalee, D.K. (2001). Algebra for all: The role of technology and constructivism in an algebra course for at-risk students. Preventing School Failure, 45(4), 171-176.
- Richardson, S. (2009). Mathematics teachers’ development, exploration, and advancement of technological pedagogical content knowledge in the teaching and learning of algebra. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 117-130.
- Schmidt, D.A., Baran, E., Thompson A.D., Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P. & Shin, T. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
- Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
- Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
- Sinclair M. (2004). Working with accurate representations: the case of preconstructed dynamic geometry sketches. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 23(2), 191-208.
- Steinberg, R., Sleeman, D., & Ktorza, D. (1991). Algebra students’ knowledge of equivalence of equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(2), 112-121
- Tajudin, N.M., Tarmizi, R.A., Ali, W.Z.W., & Konting, M.M. (2009). The effects of using graphing calculators in teaching and learning of mathematics on students’ performance. Jurnal Sains dan Matematik, 1(2), 1-28.
- Tabach, M., Hershkowitz, R., & Arcavi, A. (2008). Learning beginning algebra with spreadsheets in a computer intensive environment. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(1), 48-63.
- Vaiyavutjamai, P., & Clements, M.A. (2006). Effects of classroom instruction on students’ understanding of quadratic equations. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(1), 47-77.
- Vaiyavutjamai, P., Ellerton, N.F., & Clements, M.A. (2005). Students’ attempts to solve two elementary quadratic equations: A study in three nations. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D., Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonagh, R. Pierce, & A. Roche (Eds.), Building connections: Research, theory and practice (pp. 735-742). Sydney, Australia:
- Zbiek, R.M., Hied, M.K., Blume, G., & Dick, T.P. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education: The perspective of constructs. In F. Lester (Ed.), SecondHandbook of Research on Mathematics and Learning (pp. 1169-1207), New York: Information Age.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.