You are here:

Teachers’ TPACK Competency Developed and Observed in EFL Classrooms: The Impact of TPACK-in-Action Workshops
PROCEEDINGS

, Center for Technology in Learning & Teaching, Iowa State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Jacksonville, Florida, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-07-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to investigate how the TPACK-in-Action teacher education intervention that advocates the learning-by-doing approach contributes to the development of teachers' TPACK competency and how the competencies were adopted into classroom teaching. Participants are 24 elementary English teachers in Taiwan. Adopting a case study approach situated in a mixed methods design, both qualitative and quantitative data were collected to answer the research questions through four major sources, including surveys, observations, interviews, and reflections. It was found that the TPACK-in-Action workshops had a strong and positive impact on development of teachers' TPACK competency and that TPACK competencies were observed in teachers' teaching. Findings indicated that observation contributed to a more in-depth understanding of TPACK competency. It also has theoretical and pedagogical implications for CALL teacher education.

Citation

Tai, S.J.D. (2014). Teachers’ TPACK Competency Developed and Observed in EFL Classrooms: The Impact of TPACK-in-Action Workshops. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 49-56). Jacksonville, Florida, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Angeli, C. (2005). Transforming a teacher education method course through technology: Effects on preservice Teachers’ technology competency Computers& Education, 45 (4) (2005), 383– 398
  2. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers and Education, 52(1), 154-168.
  3. Archambault, L., Wetzel, K., Foulger, T., & Williams, M. (2010). Professional development 2.0: transforming teacher education pedagogy with 21st century tools. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27 (1), 4-11
  4. Baran, E, Wang, W., Tai, S.J.D, Schmidt-Crawford, D., Thompson, A, Kara, A.G., & Yurdakul, I.K. (2012). Examining teachers’ TPACK through the lens of classroom observation. Unpublished manuscript.
  5. Chapelle, C. & Hegelheimer, V. (2004). The English language teacher in the 21st century. In S. Fotos & C. Browne (Eds.), New Perspectives on CALL for Second Language Classrooms (pp. 299-316). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  6. Chuang, H.-H. & Huang, F.-C. (2012). Exploring primary and secondary school teachers’percevied technological pedagogical content Knowledge (TPACK) in Taiwan. Paper presented at 2012 Taiwan Education Research Conference at Natioanl Sun Yat-sen University. Dec 19-22, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  7. Demetriadis, S., Barbas, A., Molohides, A., Palaigeorgiou, G., Psillos, D., Vlahavas, I., Tsoukalas, I., & Pombortsis, A. (2003). “Cultures in negotiation”: teachers’ acceptance/resistance attitudes considering the infusion of technology into schools. Computers& Education, 41(1), 19-37.
  8. Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 319-346.
  9. Hegelheimer, V. (2006). When the technology course is required. In P. Hubbard& M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher Education in CALL (pp. 117-133). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing
  10. Hong, K.H. (2010). CALL teacher education as an impetus for L2 teachers in integrating technology. ReCALL, 22, 53-69.
  11. Hubbard, P. (2008). CALL and the future of language teacher education. Calico Journal, 25(2), 175-188.
  12. Hubbard, P. & Levy, M. (2006). The scope of CALL education. In P. Hubbard& M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher Education in CALL (pp. 2-20). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing
  13. Kessler, G. & Plakans, L. (2008). Does teachers’ confidence with CALL equal innovative and integrated use? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 269-282.
  14. Koehler, M. And Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In: AACTE Committee on Innovation Technology (Eds.). Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators (pp. 3-29). London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
  15. Lee, S., & Son, J.M. (2006). The use of ICT in Korean middle school English classrooms: Practices and challenges. English Language Teaching, 18(1), 49-73.
  16. Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL Dimensions: Options and Issues in Computer-Assisted Language Learning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  17. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 10171054.
  18. Peters, M. (2006). Developing computer competencies for pre-service language teachers: Is one course enough? In P. Hubbard& M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher Education in CALL (pp. 153165).

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.