You are here:

Understanding the Effectiveness of ICT Professional Learning through the TPACK Conceptual Framework: A Case Study PROCEEDINGS

, , Curtin University, Australia

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Victoria, Canada ISBN 978-1-939797-03-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

With a significant investment in digital technologies in Australian schools, the effective integration of such technology into teaching and learning is paramount. A growing body of evidence indicates that ICT professional learning is integral to the transformation of pedagogy that will improve student learning outcomes. The question arises as to how professional learning is planned and delivered within schools to ensure that all needs are being met. The purpose of this paper is to report on the research findings of a case study into professional learning and ICT integration. The TPACK conceptual framework underpins the analyses of the data and brings forth the importance of technological and pedagogical knowledge. Six key categories will be discussed and the implication for practice will be considered.

Citation

de Vries, J. & Broadley, T. (2013). Understanding the Effectiveness of ICT Professional Learning through the TPACK Conceptual Framework: A Case Study. In J. Herrington, A. Couros & V. Irvine (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2013--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 506-514). Victoria, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 18, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Anderson, N. & Henderson, M. (2004). E-PD: blended models of sustaining teacher professional development in digital literacies. E-Learning 1 (3) p383-394
  2. Berrett, B. (2012). Administrator insights and reflections: technology integration in schools.(Report). The Qualitative report, 17(1), 200.
  3. Broadley, T. (2012). Enhancing professional learning for rural educators by rethinking connectedness. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 22 (1), 85-106.
  4. Creswell, J. (2008) Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (N.D.). The ICT Innovation Fund. Retrieved from http://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/DigitalEducationRevolution/DigitalStrategyforTeachers/Pages/ICTInn OvationFund.aspx
  5. Ertmer, P.A. & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T. (2010). Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs and Culture Intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 3, p255-284
  6. Fogarty, R & Pete, B. (2009). Professional learning 101: A Syllabus of Seven Protocols. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(4) p32-34
  7. Fraenkel, J. & Wallen, N. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education (5th Ed). New York: McGraw Hill Higher Education
  8. Gerard, L., Varma, K., Corliss, S.B., & Linn, M.C. (2011). Professional Development for Technology-Enhanced Inquiry Science. Review of educational research, 81(3), 408-448.
  9. Harris, J.B. & Hofer, M.J. (2011). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Action: A Descriptive Study of Secondary Teachers’ Curriculum-Based Technology-Related Instructional Planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43, 3, p211-229
  10. Higgins, T.E., & Spitulnik, M.W. (2008). Supporting Teacher’s Use of Technology in Science Instruction through Professional Development..Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, p511-521
  11. Hofer, M., Grandgenett, N., Harris, J., & Swan, K. (2011). Testing a TPACK-Based Technology Integration Observation Instrument Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2011, held in Chesapeake, VA, (pp. 4352-4359). Retrieved from
  12. Keengwe, J., & Onchwari, G. (2011). Fostering meaningful student learning through constructivist pedagogy and technology integration.(Report). International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 7(4), 1.
  13. Kim, H., Choi, H., Han, J., & So, H. (2012). Enhancing teachers’ ICT capacity for the 21st century learning environment: Three cases of teacher education in Korea. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(Special Issue 6), 965-982. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet28/kim.pdf Kopcha, T. (2012). Teachers' perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers& Education, 59(4), 1109-1121.
  14. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/library/content.asp?contentid=12516 Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C. & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers& Education, 51, 1523-1537
  15. Peeraer, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2012). The limits of programmed professional development on integration of information and communication technology in education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(Special Issue 6), 1039-1056. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet28/peeraer.pdf Phelps, R., Graham, A., & Watts, T. (2011) Acknowledging the complexity and diversity of historical and cultural ICT professional learning practices in schools. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), p47-63
  16. Prestridge, S. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers& Education, 58(1), 449. Rablin, A., (2007) Supporting Teachers professional learning and innovation: where to from here? Journal of the Queensland Society for Information Technology in Education, QUICK 102, p16-19
  17. Schrum, L. (1999). Technology Professional Development for Teachers. Educational Technology, Research and Development. 47, 4. P83
  18. Seidel, J (1998) Qualitative Data Analysis. The Ethnograph v5 Manual, Appendix E. Available online at: http://www.qualisresearch.com/ Vanderlinde, R., & Van Braak, J. (2010). The e-capacity of primary schools: Development of a conceptual model and scale construction from a school improvement perspective. Computers& Education, 55(2), 541-553.
  19. Way, J., & Webb, C. (2007). A framework for analysing ICT adoption in Australian Primary Schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 23(4) 559-582
  20. Yamagata-Lynch, L.C. (2003). How a technology professional development program fits into teachers’ work life. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, p591-607
  21. Yurdakul, I., Odabasi, H., Kilicer, K., Coklar, B., & Kurt, A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale.(Report). Computers& Education, 58(3), 964-977.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.