You are here:

Faculty Best Practices Using Blended Learning in E-learning and Face-to-face Instruction.
PROCEEDINGS

, Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, ITESM-CCM, Mexico

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Washington, DC, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-54-9 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

Presenting a higher education case study from Mexico City, ITESM-CCM College, describing faculty best and worst practices using a blended learning approach in e-learning and face-to-face instruction. The presentation will comment on pedagogical and technological problems, difficulties, constraints, and successes that ITESM-CCM faculty has when using a blended learning approach."Blended learning" is widely used nowadays in many higher education institutions, especially those which have embraced distance education and any other form of e-learning as one of their major institutional and teaching efforts, such as "The Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey" (ITESM) has done in Mexico.

Citation

Mortera-Gutierrez, F. (2004). Faculty Best Practices Using Blended Learning in E-learning and Face-to-face Instruction. In J. Nall & R. Robson (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2004--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 845-850). Washington, DC, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 26, 2021 from .

© 2004 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning. E-Learning 3 (3), 54.
  2. Brown, D.G. (2001). Hybrid courses are best. Syllabus, online http://www.wfu.edu/~brown/Syllabus%20Articles/SylHybrid%20Courses.htm
  3. Fox, M. (2002). Keeping the blended promise. E-Learning 3 (3), 26-29.
  4. Hofman, J. (2001). Blended Learning Case Study. Online http://www.learningcircuits.org/2001/apr2001/hofmann.html
  5. Kerres, M., & DeWitt, C. (2003). A didactical framework for the design of blended learning arrangements. Journal of Educational Media 28 (2-3), 101-113.
  6. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  7. Osguthorpe, R.T., & Graham, C.R. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 4(3), 227-233.
  8. Reay, J.(2001). Blended learning: A fusion for the future. Knowledge Management Review 4 (3), 1.
  9. Reigeluth, C.M. (1983). Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  10. Valiathan, P. (2002). Blended learning models. Online http://www.learningcircuits.org/2002/ Aug2002/valiathan
  11. Young, J.R. (2002). Hybrid teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online. Chronicle of Higher Education, online http://chronicle.com/free/v48/i28/28a03301.htm

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections