Techno-literacy and blogging within a formal higher education setting
ARTICLE
Edilson Arenas, CQUniversity - Higher Education Division, Australia ; Julianne Lynch, Deakin University, Faculty of Arts and Education, Australia
International Journal on E-Learning, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
For the last two decades, higher education institutions have been actively engaged in the use of online technologies with the aim of transforming the ways we teach and learn to improve students’ learning experiences and outcomes. However, despite significant investment in infrastructure and training and a wide-scale uptake of such technologies, the promised transformative effect on student learning is yet to be actualised outside of small pockets of innovation. In this paper, we argue that one of the factors contributing to lack of qualitative large-scale transformation is students’ lack of preparedness and experience in using online tools for academic purposes. Focusing on students’ experience of a learning activity that used blogging to promote critical thinking and reflection, we draw on data from a doctoral study to demonstrate how a techno-literacy framework can be used to analyse the nuances of students’ preparedness to put such technologies to work within a formal higher education setting. We argue that, although contemporary university students are largely operationally literate when using online learning tools, they often lack the cultural and critical skills required to use such technologies in a meaningful way to support powerful learning. We argue that, for online learning technologies to transform learning, students need to be supported to develop these higher order techno-literacies.
Citation
Arenas, E. & Lynch, J. (2015). Techno-literacy and blogging within a formal higher education setting. International Journal on E-Learning, 14(4), 409-422. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 28, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/48016/.
© 2015 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf Bain, B.D., & McNaught, C. (2006). How academics use technology in teaching andlearning: understanding the relationship between beliefs and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 99-113.
- Bartholomew, M., Jones, T., & Glassman, M. (2012). A Community of Voices: Educational Blog Management Strategies and Tools. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 56(4), 19-25.
- Biggs, J.B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (Vol. 2). Philadelphia, PA.: Society for Research into Higher Education, Open University Press.
- Cain, H.R., Giraud, V., Stedman, N.L.P., & Adams, B.L. (2012). Critical Thinking Skills Evidenced in Graduate Students Blogs. Journal of Leadership Education, 11(2), 7287.
- Caruso, J.B., & Kvavik, R.B. (2005). ECAR Study of Students and Information Technology, 2005: Convenience, Connection, Control, and Learning. EDUCAUSE Centre for Applied Research. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ers0506
- Coates, H., James, R., & Baldwin, G. (2005). A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tertiary Education and Management, 11(1), 19-36.
- Davies, J., & Merchant, M.G. (2009). Web 2.0 for Schools: Learning and Social Participation. Peter Lang.
- Deng, L., & Yuen, A.H.K. (2012). Understanding student perceptions and motivation towards academic blogs: An exploratory study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(1), 48-66.
- Downes, S. (2005). E-learning 2.0. ELearn, 2005(10). Retrieved from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1104968
- Garrison, D.R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.
- Goodfellow, R. (2004). Online literacies and learning: Operational, cultural and critical dimensions. Language and Education, 18(5), 379-399.
- Goodfellow, R. (2011). Literacy, literacies and the digital in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 131-144. Doi:10.1080/13562517.2011.544125
- Green, B. (1988). Subject-specific literacy and school learning: A focus on writing. Australian Journal of Education, 32(2), 156-79.
- Keller, C., & Cernerud, L. (2002). Student’s perceptions of E-learning in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 27(1), 55-67.
- Kerawalla, L., Minocha, S., Kirkup, G., & Conole, G. (2008). An empirically grounded framework to guide blogging in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 31-42. Doi:10.1111/J.1365-2729.2008.00286.x
- Kirkwood, A.T., & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the 21st Century: what do we know about students’ attitudes and experiences of ICT that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education, 30(3).
- Krause, K.-L., & McEwen, C. (2009). Engaging and retaining students online: a case study. Proceedings of the 32nd HERDSA Annual Conference (pp. 251-262). Presented
- Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2008). Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices. New York, Berlin, Oxford: Peter Lang.
- Lankshear, C., Snyder, I., & Green, B. (2000). Teachers and Technoliteracy: Managing Literacy, Technology and Learning in Schools. Allen& Unwin.
- Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (Vol. 2). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
- Marsden, N., & Piggot-Irvine, E. (2012). Using blogging and laptop computers to improve writing skills on a vocational training course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(1), 30-47.
- Merchant, G. (2011). Unravelling the social network: theory and research. Learning, Me-422 Arenas and Lynch
- Minocha, S. (2009). An empirically-grounded study on the effective use of social software in education. Education+ Training, 51(5/6), 381-394. Doi:10.1108/00400910910987192
- O’Toole, J.M., & Absalom, D.J. (2003). The impact of blended learning on student outcomes: Is there room on the horse for two? Journal of Educational Media, 28(2-3), 179-189.
- Oliver, B., & Goerke, V. (2007). Australian undergraduates’ use and ownership of emerging technologies: Implications and opportunities for creating engaging learning experiences for the Net Generation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 171-186.
- Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can blended learning be redeemed? E-learning, 2(1), 17-26.
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
- Prensky, M. (2007). How to teach with technology: keeping both teachers and students confortable in an era of exponential change. Emerging Technologies for Learning. Retrieved from http://publications.becta.org.uk/download.cfm?resID=25940 Raby, C., & Meunier, H. (2011). Factors influencing ICT integration according to the teacher’s level of pedagogical integration. In M. Koehler& P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 2667-2673). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved from http://
- Robertson, J. (2011). The Educational Affordances of Blogs for Self-Directed Learning. Computers& Education, 57(2), 1628-1644.
- Smith, S.D., & Caruso, J.B. (2010). The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2010. ECAR Centre for Applied Resarch. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ers1006 Steel, J., & Hudson, A. (2001). Educational Technology in Learning and Teaching: The Perceptions and Experiences of Teaching Staff. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(2), 103-111.
- Trentin, G., & Wheeler, S. (2009). A Critical review of blended learning in the UK: What Future for the LMS? In E. Stacey& P. Gerbic (Eds.), Effective Blended Learning Practices: Evidence-Based Perspectives in ICT-Facilitated Education. Hershey, PA: IGI Global Press.
- Wheeler, S. (2009). Learning space mashups: Combining Web 2.0 tools to create collaborative and reflective learning spaces. Future Internet, 1, 3-13. Doi:10.3390/ fi1010003
- Williams, J., & Jacob, J. (2005). Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in the higher education sector. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 232-247.
- Wise, L., & Quealy, J. (2006). LMS governance project report. Melbourne: MelbourneMonash Collaboration in Educational Technologies. Retrieved from http://wisebytes.net/presentations/LMS_Governance_Report.pdf
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References