A Design Framework and Research Program for Enacting Science Cyberlearning
PROCEEDINGS
Cindy Kern, University of New Haven, United States ; Kent Crippen, University of Florida, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Las Vegas, NV, USA ISBN 978-1-939797-05-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA
Abstract
In this paper we detail the 5-Featured Dynamic Inquiry Enterprise (5-DIE), a framework for enacting cyberlearning and describe a program of design-based research intent on enacting this innovation in the complex and constrained reality of contemporary science classrooms. The results of two recent studies that were completed as the first iterations of the design-test-redesign process are used to illustrate the concurrent generation of theoretical and practical knowledge.
Citation
Kern, C. & Crippen, K. (2013). A Design Framework and Research Program for Enacting Science Cyberlearning. In T. Bastiaens & G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2013--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1195-1199). Las Vegas, NV, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 28, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/115031/.
© 2013 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B.J., Krajcik, J., Marx, R.W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating Usable Innovations in Systemic Reform: Scaling Up Technology-Embedded Project-Based Science in Urban Schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 149-164.
- Crippen, K.J., & Archambault, L.M. (2012). Scaffolded inquiry-based instruction with technology: A signature pedagogy for STEM education. Computers in the Schools, 29(1-2), 157-173. Doi:10.1080/07380569.2012.658733
- Edelson, D.C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11 (1), 105-121.
- Fishman, B., Marx, R.W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a Framework for Research on Systemic Technology Innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43-76.
- Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Wachira, P. (2008). Computer Technology Integration and Student Learning: Barriers and Promise. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(6), 560-565.
- Linn, M.C. (2006). The knowledge integration perspective on learning and instruction. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 243-264). New York, NY:
- Roschelle, J., Knudsen, J., & Hegedus, S. (2010). From new technological infrastructures to curricular activity systems: Advanced designs for teaching and learning. In M.J. Jacobson& P. Reimann (Eds.), Designs for Learning Environments of the Future: International Perspectives from the Learning Sciences (pp. 233-262). New York: Springer.
- Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D.D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 409-425). New York, NY:
- Wang, F., & Hannafin, M.J. (2005). Design based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-25.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References