Exploring Motivation in an Online Context: A Case Study
ARTICLE
Maggie Hartnett, Alison St. George, Massey University, New Zealand ; Jon Dron, Athabasca University, Canada
CITE Journal Volume 14, Number 1, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
With the increasing ubiquity of new technologies, many claims are being made about their potential to transform tertiary education. In order for this transformation to be realized, however, a range of issues needs to be addressed. Research evidence suggests that motivation is an important consideration for online learners. This paper reports on one aspect of a case study situated within a larger study that investigates the nature of motivation to learn of preservice teachers in an online environment. Using self-determination theory as an analytical framework, the focus here is on the underlying concepts of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. The ways in which certain social and contextual factors can foster perceptions of these needs being met are explored. These factors are known to have a supportive effect on learner motivation. Most prominent among these were the relevance of the learning activity, the provision of clear guidelines, and the ongoing support and feedback from the lecturer that was responsive to learners' needs. Supportive, caring relationships were also important.
Citation
Hartnett, M., St. George, A. & Dron, J. (2014). Exploring Motivation in an Online Context: A Case Study. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 31-53. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved March 28, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/114723/.
© 2014 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education
References
View References & Citations Map- Anderson, T. (2006). Interaction in learning and teaching on the educational semantic web. In C. Juwah (Ed.), Interactions in online education: Implications for theory and practice (pp. 141-155). London, England: Routledge.
- Artino, A.R. (2007). Online military training: Using a social cognitive view of motivation and self-regulation to understand students' satisfaction, perceived learning, and choice. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3), 191-202.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
- Bekele, T.A. (2010). Motivation and satisfaction in Internet-supported learning environments: A review. Educational Technology& Society, 13(2), 116-127.
- Blumer, H. (2006). What is wrong with social theory? In N.K. Denzin (Ed.), Sociological methods: A sourcebook (pp. 84-96). New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
- Boekaerts, M., & Minnaert, A. (2006). Affective and motivational outcomes of working in collaborative groups. Educational Psychology, 26(2), 187-208.
- Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn and Bacon.
- Brophy, J. (2010). Motivating students to learn (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Carpenter, J.K. (2011). An exploratory study of the role of teaching experience in motivation and academic achievement in a virtual ninth grade english I course
- Connell, J.P. (1990). Context, self, and action: A motivational analysis of self-system processes across the life-span. In D. Cicchetti & M. Beeghly (Eds.), The self in transition: Infancy to childhood (pp. 61-98). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Connell, J.P., & Wellborn, J.G. (1991). Competence, autonomy and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M.R. Gunnar & L.A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Development (Vol. 23, pp. 43-77). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1985). Emergent motivation and the evolution of the self. In D.A. Kleiber & M.L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 4, pp. 93119).
- Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
- Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182-185.
- Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In R.M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 85-107). Oxford, UK: Oxford
- Evelein, F., Korthagen, F., & Brekelmans, M. (2008). Fulfilment of the basic psychological needs of student teachers during their first teaching experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1137-1148.
- Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87-105.
- Ginsberg, M.B., & Wlodkowski, R.J. (2000). Creating highly motivated classrooms for all students: A schoolwide approach to powerful teaching with diverse learners. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Guay, F., Ratelle, C.F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 233-240.
- Guay, F., Vallerand, R.J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The situational motivation scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24(3), 175-213.
- Harasim, L. (2012). Learning theory and online technologies. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Hartnett, M. (2010). Motivation to learn in online environments: An exploration of two tertiary education contexts (Doctoral thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand). Retrieved from http://muir.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/2043
- Hidi, S., & Renninger, K.A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
- Huang, H.-M., & Liaw, S.-S. (2007). Exploring learners' self-efficacy, autonomy, and motivation toward e-learning. Perceptual& Motor Skills, 105(2), 581-586.
- Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E.L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It's not autonomy support or structure, but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588-600.
- Kehrwald, B.A. (2008). Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environments. Distance Education, 29(1), 89-106.
- Keller, J.M. (2008). First principles of motivation to learn and E3-learning. Distance Education, 29(2), 175-185.
- Keller, J.M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. New York, NY: Springer.
- Kim, C., & Keller, J.M. (2008). Effects of motivational and volitional email messages (MVEM) with personal messages on undergraduate students' motivation, study habits and achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 36-51.
- Kim, K.-J., & Frick, T.W. (2011). Changes in student motivation during online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 1-23.
- Knowles, M.S. (1984). Andragogy in action. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Krapp, A. (2002). An educational-psychological theory of interest and its relation to SDT. In E.L. Deci & R.M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 405427).
- Lin, Y.-M., Lin, G.-Y., & Laffey, J.M. (2008). Building a social and motivational framework for understanding satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 1-27.
- Liyanagunawardena, T.R., Adams, A.A., & Williams, S.A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. International Review of Research in Open& Distance Learning, 14(3), 202-227.
- Martens, R.L., Gulikers, J., & Bastiaens, T. (2004). The impact of intrinsic motivation on e-learning in authentic computer tasks. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(5), 368-376.
- Martens, R.L., & Kirschner, P.A. (2004). Predicting intrinsic motivation. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
- McCombs, B.L., & Vakili, D. (2005). A learner-centered framework for e-learning. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1582-1600.
- Moore, M.G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 23-38). London, England: Routledge.
- Moos, D.C., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Exploring the fluctuation of motivation and use of self-regulatory processes during learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 36(3), 203-231.
- Moos, D.C., & Azevedo, R. (2009). Learning with computer-based learning environments: A literature review of computer self-efficacy. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 576-600
- Patall, E.A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J.C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 270-300.
- Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159-175.
- Reeve, J., Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2004). Self-determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding sociocultural influences on student motivation. In D.M. McInerney& S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning: Big theories revisited (Vol. 4, pp. 31-60). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
- Reeve, J., Nix, G., & Hamm, D. (2003). Testing models of the experience of selfdetermination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 375-392.
- Reeve, J., Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., & Jang, H. (2008). Understanding and promoting autonomous self-regulation: A self-determination theory perspective. In D.H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 223-244). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Rienties, B., Giesbers, B., Tempelaar, D., Lygo-Baker, S., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2012). The role of scaffolding and motivation in CSCL. Computers& Education, 59(3), 893-906.
- Robinson, B., & Latchem, C. (2003). Teacher education: Challenge and change. In B. Robinson& C. Latchem (Eds.), Teacher education through open and distance learning (pp. 1-27). London, England: Routledge Falmer.
- Rovai, A.P. (2007). Facilitating online discussions effectively. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 77-88.
- Rovai, A.P., & Lucking, R. (2003). Sense of community in a higher education televisionbased distance education program. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(2), 5-16.
- Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
- Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557-1585.
- Ryan, R.M., La Guardia, J.G., Solky-Butzel, J., Chirkov, V., & Kim, Y. (2005). On the interpersonal regulation of emotions: Emotional reliance across gender, relationships, and cultures. Personal Relationships, 12(1), 145-163.
- Schunk, D.H., Meece, J.L., & Pintrich, P.R. (2014). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B.J. (2006). Competence and control beliefs: Distinguishing the means and ends. In P.A. Alexander& P.H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 349-367). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Shroff, R.H., & Vogel, D.R. (2009). Assessing the factors deemed to support individual student intrinsic motivation in technology supported online and face-to-face discussions. Journal of Information Technology Education, 8, 59-85.
- Shroff, R.H., Vogel, D.R., & Coombes, J. (2008). Assessing individual-level factors supporting student intrinsic motivation in online discussions: A qualitative study. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(1), 111-125.
- Turner, J.C., & Patrick, H. (2008). How does motivation develop and why does it change? Reframing motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 119-131.
- Van Etten, S., Pressley, M., McInerney, D.M., & Liem, A.D. (2008). College seniors' theory of their academic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 812828.
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Wegerif, R. (1998). The social dimensions of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.aln.org/jaln/v2n1/social-dimension-asynchronous-learning-networks
- Wighting, M.J., Liu, J., & Rovai, A.P. (2008). Distinguishing sense of community and motivation characteristics between online and traditional college students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(3), 285-295.
- Xie, K., DeBacker, T.K., & Ferguson, C. (2006). Extending the traditional classroom through online discussion: The role of student motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(1), 67-89.
- Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2007). Predictors for student success in an online course. Educational Technology& Society, 10(2), 71-83. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References