Assessing Academic Performance between Traditional and Distance Education Course Formats
Journal of Educational Technology & Society Volume 11, Number 1, ISSN 1176-3647 e-ISSN 1176-3647
The goal of this study was to explore whether differences in student academic indicators exist between taking a course face-to-face (F2F) and taking a course via distance education (DE). Three hundred and eighty five students were enrolled in a course offered, both, as F2F (n = 116) and as DE (n = 269). Course content, instructor, textbook adopted, and assessment methods were consistent between the two course delivery formats. Final grades, DFW rates, and end of term course and instructor evaluations were used as the outcome indicators. In addition, student demographic information was factored into data analyses. Results indicated that there was a statistically significant difference in final grade, DFW rates, and end of term course evaluation response rates between the course offerings. Further analysis suggested that freshman grade performance was significantly different between course offerings. Implications and policy suggestions regarding distance education will be discussed. (Contains 4 figures and 1 table.)
Urtel, M.G. (2008). Assessing Academic Performance between Traditional and Distance Education Course Formats. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 322-330.
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Katina E. Pollock & Sue M. Winton
Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Vol. 2, No. 1 (2011)
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.