You are here:

How Do We Rate? An Evaluation of Online Student Evaluations
ARTICLE

,

Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Volume 34, Number 1, ISSN 0260-2938

Abstract

This paper analyses the popular RateMyProfessors (RMP) website where students evaluate instructors in higher education. A study was designed to measure (1) the awareness and utilisation of the RMP website, (2) the internal and external validity of the RMP ratings in measuring teaching effectiveness, and (3) variation in the above across disciplines. It is concluded that the category of ratings, created by the website, establishes an anti-intellectual tone that manifests itself in comments about instructors' personality, easiness of workload and entertainment value rather than knowledge attained. (Contains 3 figures, 3 tables, and 5 notes.)

Citation

Davison, E. & Price, J. (2009). How Do We Rate? An Evaluation of Online Student Evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 51-65. Retrieved December 10, 2019 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on April 19, 2013. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords