Group-Metacognitive Support for Online Inquiry in Mathematics with Differential Self-Questioning
Journal of Educational Computing Research Volume 40, Number 4, ISSN 0735-6331
This exploratory study investigated 100 Israeli 9th graders who used two different group-metacognitive support methods in online mathematical inquiry--group feedback guidance (GFG) and self-explanation guidance (SEG)--compared to a control group (CONT). The study evaluated each method's effects on students': (a) mathematical inquiry ability: problem solving, explanations, mathematical feedback in online forum discussions, and transfer ability; and (b) self-regulated learning (SRL) measures (self-report questionnaires and metacognitive feedback in online forum discussions). Metacognitive support methods, based on IMPROVE self-questioning strategies, appeared in pop-up screens and provided the two experimental groups with differential cues for problem-solving processes. Mixed quantitative and qualitative analyses showed that GFG students outperformed SEG students in most mathematical and SRL measures and the CONT students in all measures. In addition, SEG students outperformed the CONT students in mathematical problem-solving but not on mathematical transfer ability or SRL. (Contains 5 tables and 3 figures.)
Kramarski, B. & Dudai, V. (2009). Group-Metacognitive Support for Online Inquiry in Mathematics with Differential Self-Questioning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(4), 377-404.
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Christopher Devers, Indiana Wesleyan University, United States; Stefanie Panke, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2017 (Oct 17, 2017) pp. 1709–1717
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.