Research On Graphing Calculators at the Secondary Level: Implications for Mathematics Teacher Education
Article
Signe Kastberg, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, United States ; Keith Leatham, Brigham Young University, United States
CITE Journal Volume 5, Number 1, ISSN 15285804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
This article focuses on three key factors that a survey of literature indicated impact the teaching and learning of mathematics with graphing calculators: access to graphing calculators, the place of graphing calculators in the mathematics curriculum, and the connection between graphing calculators and pedagogical practice. Access to graphing calculators is associated with student achievement gains and a wide array of problemsolving approaches. The research suggests students' achievement is positively affected when they use curricula designed with graphing calculators as a primary tool. Studies of teachers' use and privileging of graphing calculators illustrate the impact professionals have on students' mathematical knowledge and calculator expertise. Implications of these research findings for preservice and inservice teacher education are summarized.
Citation
Kastberg, S. & Leatham, K. (2005). Research On Graphing Calculators at the Secondary Level: Implications for Mathematics Teacher Education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(1), 2537. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved April 22, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/5641/.
© 2005 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education
Keywords
References
 Adams, T.L. (1997). Addressing students' difficulties with the concept of function: Applying graphing calculators and a model of conceptual change. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 19(2), 4357.
 Boers, M.A., & Jones, P.L. (1994). Students' use of graphics calculators under examination conditions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 25, 491516.
 Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1991). A framework for functions: Prototypes, multiple representations, and transformations. Paper presented at the 13th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Blacksburg, VA.
 CorePlus Mathematics Project. (2004). Features of the CPMP curriculum. Retrieved August 25, 2004, from http://www.wmich.edu/cpmp/features.html
 Doerr, H.M., & Zangor, R. (1999). The teacher, the task and the tool: The emergence of classroom norms. International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 6, 267280.
 Doerr, H.M., & Zangor, R. (2000). Creating meaning for and with the graphing calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 143163.
 Drijvers, P., & Doorman, M. (1996). The graphics calculator in mathematics education. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 425440.
 Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2000). Reshaping teacher and student roles in technologyenriched classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12, 303320.
 Graham, A.T., & Thomas, M.O.J. (2000). Building a versatile understanding of algebraic variables with a graphic calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 265282.
 Harskamp, E.G., Suhre, C.J.M., & Van Struen, A. (1998). The graphics calculator in mathematics education: An experiment in the netherlands. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 6, 1331.
 Harskamp, E.G., Suhre, C.J.M., & Van Struen, A. (2000). The graphics calculator and students' solution strategies. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12, 3752.
 Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65100). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
 Hong, Y., Toham, M., & Kiernan, C. (2000). Supercalculators and university entrance calculus examinations. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12, 321326.
 Huntley, M.A., Rasmussen, C.L., Villarubi, R.S., Sangtong, J., & Fey, J.T. (2000). Effects of standardsbased mathematics education: A study of the CorePlus mathematics project algebra and functions strand. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31 , 328361.
 Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 390419). New York:
 Laborde, C. (1999). The integration of new technologies as a window on teachers' decisions. Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Mathematics Teacher Education, Taipei, Taiwan. LaGrange, J.B. (1999a). Complex calculators in the classroom: Theoretical and practical reflections on teaching precalculus. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 4, 5181.
 Leatham, K.R. (2002). Preservice secondary mathematics teachers' beliefs about teaching with technology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
 Merriweather, M., & Tharp, M.L. (1999). The effect of instruction with graphing calculators on how general mathematics students naturalistically solve algebraic problems. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 18(1), 722.
 Mitchelmore, M., & Cavanagh, M. (2000). Students' difficulties in operating a graphics calculator. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12, 254268.
 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
 Porzio, D. (1999). Effects of differing emphases in the use of multiple representations and technology on students' understanding of calculus concepts. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 21(3), 129.
 Romberg, T.A. (1992). Problematic features of the school mathematics curriculum. In P.W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 749788). New York: Simon
 Schmidt, M.E. (1998). Research on middle grade teachers' beliefs about calculators. Action in Teacher Education, 20(2), 1123.
 Schwarz, B.B., & Hershkowitz, R. (1999). Prototypes: Brakes or levers in learning the function concept? The role of computer tools. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 362389.
 Simmt, E. (1997). Graphing calculators in high school mathematics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16, 269289.
 Simonson, L.M., & Dick, T.P. (1997). Teachers' perceptions of the impact of graphing calculators in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16, 239268.
 Slavit, D. (1996). Graphing calculators in a "hybrid" Algebra II classroom. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(1), 914.
 Tharp, M.L., Fitzsimmons, J.A., & Ayers, R.L.B. (1997). Negotiating a technological shift: Teacher perception of the implementation of graphing calculators. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16, 551575.
 Thompson, D.R., & Senk, S.L. (2001). The effects of curriculum on achievement in secondyear algebra: The example of the University of Chicago School Mathematics Project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 5884.
 Usiskin, Z. (1986). Translating grades 712 mathematics recommendations into reality. Educational Leadership, 44(4), 3035.
 Van Streun, A., Harskamp, E.G., & Suhre, C.J.M. (2000). The effect of the graphic calculator on students' solution approaches: A secondary analysis. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 8, 2739.
 Zarzycki, P. (2000). Thinking mathematically with technology. International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 7, 181192.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.
Cited By

Using Cognitive Tutor Software In Learning Linear Algebra Word Concept
KaiJu Yang, Indiana University Bloomington, United States
Journal of Interactive Learning Research Vol. 26, No. 4 (October 2015) pp. 431–452

The Role of Technology in Supporting Students’ Mathematical Thinking: Extending the Metaphors of Amplifier and Reorganizer
Milan Sherman, Drake University, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 14, No. 3 (September 2014) pp. 220–246

A Comparative Study of Mathematical Content, Pedagogy and Technology using a Paired TTest of the means of Seven Domains
Maria Mitchell, Central Connecticut State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (Mar 25, 2013) pp. 2273–2278

Transforming Teaching; Mathematical Content, Pedagogy and Technology, a Messy Problem!
Maria Mitchell, Central Connecticut State University, United States
ELearn: World Conference on ELearning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2012 (Oct 09, 2012) pp. 288–293

The Views of Preservice Teachers About the Strengths and Limitations of the Use of Graphing Calculators in Mathematics Instruction
S. Asli OzgunKoca, Wayne State University, United States
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 17, No. 2 (April 2009) pp. 203–227

Mathematics Teacher TPACK Standards and Development Model
Margaret L. Niess, Oregon State University, United States; Robert N. Ronau, University of Louisville, United States; Kathryn G. Shafer, Ball State University, United States; Shannon O. Driskell, University of Dayton, United States; Suzanne R. Harper, Miami University, United States; Christopher Johnston, George Mason University, United States; Christine Browning, Western Michigan University, United States; S. Asli ÖzgünKoca, Wayne State University, United States; Gladis Kersaint, University of South Florida, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 9, No. 1 (March 2009) pp. 4–24

Integrating Graphing Calculators and Probeware Into Science Methods Courses: Impact on Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Confidence and Perspectives on Technology for Learning and Teaching
Irina Lyublinskaya, College of Staten Island, United States; George Zhou, University of Windsor, Canada
Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching Vol. 27, No. 2 (April 2008) pp. 163–182

PreService Teachers’ Confidence and Perspectives in Using Graphing Calculator Technology for Learning and Teaching
George (Guoqiang) Zhou & Irina Lyublinskaya, City University of New York, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (Mar 26, 2007) pp. 2663–2672
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.