You are here:

A Comparison of Student Satisfaction between Traditional and Blended Technology Course Offerings in Physical Education
ARTICLE

, , , ,

Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education Volume 13, Number 1, ISSN 1302-6488

Abstract

Blended learning With the concerns and dissatisfaction with e-learning, educators are searching for alternative instructional delivery solutions to relieve the above problems. The blended e-learning system has been presented as a promising alternative learning approach. While blended learning has been recognized as having a number of advantages, insufficient learning satisfaction is still an obstacle to its successful adoption. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate students' satisfaction with blended learning course delivery compared to a traditional face-to-face class format in a general multimedia course in physical education. Forty six (n = 46) undergraduate students, between the ages of 20-22 years old, were randomly assigned into two teaching method groups: Classroom Lecture Instruction (CLI) and Blended Lecture Instruction (BLI). For the data collection at the end of this study, students completed an online satisfaction questionnaire. Independent sample t-test analysis was conducted to measure students' satisfaction towards the CLI and BLI methods. Results indicated that a blended course delivery is preferred over the traditional lecture format. These finding suggest that students' satisfaction could increase when the instructor provides learning environments not only in a traditional classroom, but in an asynchronous online system as well. (Contains 1 table.)

Citation

Vernadakis, N., Giannousi, M., Tsitskari, E., Antoniou, P. & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2012). A Comparison of Student Satisfaction between Traditional and Blended Technology Course Offerings in Physical Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 137-147. Retrieved April 19, 2021 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on April 18, 2013. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.