IRRODL Volume 3, Number 2, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press
As the use of Web-based instruction increases in the educational and training domains, many people have recognized the importance of evaluating its effects on student outcomes such as learning, performance, and satisfaction. Often, these results are compared to those of conventional classroom instruction in order to determine which method is “better.” However, major differences in technology and presentation rather than instructional content can obscure the true relationship between Web-based instruction and these outcomes. Computer-based instruction (CBI), with more features similar to Web-based instruction, may be a more appropriate benchmark than conventional classroom instruction. Furthermore, there is little consensus as to what variables should be examined or what measures of learning are the most appropriate, making comparisons between studies difficult and inconclusive. In this article, we review the historical findings of CBI as an appropriate benchmark to Web-based instruction. In addition, we review 47 reports of evaluations of Web-based courses in higher education published between 1996 and 2002. A tabulation of the documented findings into eight characteristics is offered, along with our assessments of the experimental designs, effect sizes, and the degree to which the evaluations incorporated features unique to Web-based instruction.
Olson, T. & Wisher, R. (2002). The Effectiveness of Web-Based Instruction: An Initial Inquiry. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(2),. Athabasca University Press.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.
Establishing a Comprehensive Model of Cost Analysis of Web-based Training Programs based on a Systems Approach
Younghee Kong, Franklin University, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2010 (Oct 18, 2010) pp. 523–531
Richard E. Ferdig & Cathy Cavanaugh, University of Florida, United States; Meredith DiPietro, University of North Carolina Charlotte, United States; Erik W. Black & Kara Dawson, University of Florida, United States
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 17, No. 4 (October 2009) pp. 479–503
Learning from Face-to-Face or Computer-Supported Courses: Differences with respect to User Acceptance and Learning Outcomes
Michael Vogt, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Germany; Sascha Görlich, Graf Orthos Rechtschreibwerkstatt GmbH & Co.KG, Beckum, Germany; Ulrich Glowalla, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Germany
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006 (October 2006) pp. 2459–2464
Pannee Suanpang, Suan Dusit Rajabhat University, Thailand; Peter Petocz, Macquarie University - Sydney, Australia
International Journal on E-Learning Vol. 5, No. 3 (2006) pp. 415–438
Multiplexing Distance Education: Applying Multiple Sources for Multiple Learning Styles. A Case Study Using Technology to Teach a Presentation Course Online.
Sandy Friend & Carol Johnson, East Carolina University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2006 (Mar 19, 2006) pp. 1559–1564
Scott McDaniel, Middle Tennessee State University, United States; Charles Dickens, Tennessee State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2004 (2004) pp. 582–587
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.