You are here:

[Chais] Teachers in a World of Change: Teachers' Knowledge and Attitudes towards the Implementation of Innovative Technologies in Schools ARTICLE

, , Open University, Israel

IJELLO Volume 7, Number 1, ISSN 1552-2237 Publisher: Informing Science Institute

Abstract

The implementation of innovative technologies in school is a complex process that enquires creating a pedagogical, technological, and managerial systemic change in the school-culture – a process that usually fails to meet the high expectations and to create the systemic change. In light of the many recent studies, which indicate that teachers' perception and attitudes play a pivotal role of in the success or the failure of technology-implementation projects, the present study explores the teachers' perceptions and attitudes towards the implementation of an innovative technology (smart class) in school by analyzing the inter-relationships between the major pedagogical factors that act in a technology-implementation process: (1) the teachers' attitudes towards change, (2) the teachers' technological-pedagogical content knowledge, and (3) the teachers' perception of school as a learning organization. Data was gathered using questionnaires that captured the teachers' level of “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge” (TPACK), their perception of school as a learning organization, and their attitude towards change. Findings indicate a positive correlation between TPACK and the teachers' attitudes towards change, and a positive correlation between teachers' attitudes towards change and their perception of school as a learning organization. Participants who scored high in TPACK and in perceiving their school as a learning organization also scored high in their positive attitudes towards change. Key words: TPACK, attitude; teacher's attitudes towards change, school as a learning organization, innovative technology, educational technology, smart class; educational change I

Citation

Avidov-Ungar, O. & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2011). [Chais] Teachers in a World of Change: Teachers' Knowledge and Attitudes towards the Implementation of Innovative Technologies in Schools. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 7(1), 291-303. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved November 18, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Archambault, L. & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71-88.
  2. Avidov-Ungar, O. (2010). "Islands of innovation" or "Comprehensive innovation". Assimilating educational technology in teaching, learning, and management: A case study of school networks in Israel. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 6, 259-280. Retrieved from http://www.ijello.org/Volume6/IJELLOv6p259-280Avidov704.pdf Becker, C., & Lee, M. (2009). The interactive whiteboard revolution: Teaching with IWBs. Victoria, Australia: ACER Press.
  3. Becker, H. (2001). How are teachers using computers in instruction? Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, University of California, Seattle.
  4. Cibulka, J., Coursey, S., Nakayama, M., Price, J., & Stewart, S. (2000). Schools as Learning Organizations: A Review of the Literature. The Creation of High-Performance Schools through Organizational and Individual Learning. (Part One of Three). For full text see http://www.northyorks.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=13127 & P=0 ]
  5. Coffman, T. (2009). Getting to the heart of technology integration: Virginia's instructional technology resource teacher program. Learning and Learning with Technology, 36(7), 20-23.
  6. Collinson, V. (2010). To learn or not to learn: A potential organizational learning gap among school systems? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(2), 190 – 219.
  7. Coppieters, P. (2005). Turning schools into learning organizations. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(2), 129-139.
  8. Cox, S., & Graham, C.R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends, 53(5), 60-69.
  9. Cuban, L. (1988). A fundamental puzzle of school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 69(5), 340-344.
  10. Cunningham, C.A. (2009). Transforming schooling through technology: Twenty-first-century approaches to participatory learning. Education and Culture, 25(2), 46-61.
  11. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2007). Variations in the conditions for teachers' professional learning and development: Sustaining commitment and effectiveness over a career. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 423-443.
  12. Day, C., & Smethem, L. (2009).The effects of reform: Have teachers really lost their sense of professionalism? Journal of Educational Change, 10(2-3), 141-157.
  13. De Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2005). Does e-learning policy drive change in higher education? A case study relating models of organizational change to e-leaning implementation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(1), 81-95.
  14. Del Val, M.P., & Fuentes, C.M. (2003). Resistance to change: A literature review and empirical study. Management Decision, 41(12), 148-155.
  15. Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 319-346.
  16. Eshet, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
  17. Eshet, Y. (2007). Teaching online: Survival skills for the effective teacher. Inroads-The SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(2), 16-20.
  18. Fauske, J.R., & Raybould, R. (2005). Organizational learning theory in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(1), 22-40.
  19. Fullan, M. (2000). The meaning of educational change: A quarter of a century of learning. In A. Hargreaves, A. Liberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds), International handbook of educational change. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  20. Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1996). What's worth fighting for in your school? New York: Teachers College Press.
  21. Fullan, M., & Smith, G. (1999). Technology and the problem of change. Available at http://www.michaelfullan.ca/Articles_98-99/12_99.pdf Giles, C., & Hargreaves, A. (2006). The sustainability of innovative schools as learning organizations and professional learning communities during standardized reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 124-156.
  22. Halverson, R., & Smith, A. (2009). How new technologies have (and have not) changed teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(2), 49-55.
  23. Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2009). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK development. In C.D. Maddux (Ed.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2009. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  24. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teacher's technological pedagogical content knowledge: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416.
  25. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London and New York: Routledge.
  26. Kent, T.W., & MacNergney, R.F. (1999). Will technology really change education? California: Corwin Press.
  27. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical knowledge. In AACTE (Eds.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group for the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education. Teachers in a World of Change
  28. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
  29. Kontoghiorghes, C., Awbre, S., & Feurig, P.L. (2005). Examining the relationship between learning organization characteristics and change adaptation, innovation, and organizational performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly Journal, 16(2), 185-212.
  30. Korland, H. (2000). Elementary school as a learning organization. M.A., dissertation, Faculty of Education, Haifa University. [in Hebrew].
  31. Levin, B., & Fullan, M. (2008). Learning about system renewal. Educational Management Administration& Leadership, 36(2), 289-303.
  32. Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support development transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 591-596.
  33. Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., Forkosh, B.A., & Tubin, D. (2004). Sustainability, scalability and transferability of ICT-based pedagogical innovations in Israeli schools. Education, Communication& Information, 4(1), 71-82.
  34. Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., Lahav, O., & Oren, A. (2000). Web-based learning environments: Current pedagogical and technological state. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 55-77.
  35. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  36. Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  37. Ogobonna, E. & Harris L.C. (2003). Innovation organizational structure and performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(5), 512-533.
  38. Polly, D., & Mims, C. (2009). Designing professional development to support teachers' TPACK and integration of Web 2.0 technologies. In T.T. Kidd& I. Chen (Eds.), Wired for learning: Web 2.0 guide for educators. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  39. Sandy, L.D. (2010). Social capital, empowerment and educational change: A scenario of permeation of one-to-one technology in school. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(4), 284-295.
  40. Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73.
  41. Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn. A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York: Doubleday/Currency
  42. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
  43. Tas, A. (2005). Organizational learning in primary schools. Journal of Educational Reform, 14(3), 334350.
  44. Tatnall, A., & Davey, B. (2003). ICT and training: A proposal for an ecological model of innovation. Educational Technology and Society, 6(1), 14-17.
  45. Vaillant, D. (2005). Educational reform and the role of teachers. Prelac Journal, 1, 38-51.
  46. Wallace, R.M. (2004). A framework for understanding teaching with the internet. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 447-488.
  47. Way, J., Lilley, E., Ruster, C., Johnco, S., Mauric, L., & Ochs, L. (2009). Symposium: Interactive whiteboards and pedagogy in primary classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of Australian Association for Research in Education. Canberra, Australia. Retrieved December 1, 2010, from http://www.aare.edu.au/09pap/way091149.pdf
  48. Yu-Lin, W., & Ellinger, A.D. (2008). Organizational learning and innovation performance: A review of the literature and the development of a conceptual framework and research hypotheses. Paper presented at the Academy of Human Resource Development International Research Conference in the Americas, Panama City, FL.
  49. Zhao, J., & Ordóñez de Pablos, P. (2009). School innovative management model and strategies: The perspective of organizational learning. Information Systems Management, 26(3) 241-251.
  50. Zimmerman, J. (2006). Why some teachers resist change and what principals can do about it. NASSP Bulletin, 90(3), 238-249.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.