#
Factors leading to the adoption of a learning technology: The case of graphics calculators
ARTICLE

## Boris Handal, Michael Cavanagh, Leigh Wood, Peter Petocz

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Volume 27, Number 2, ISSN 0814-673X Publisher: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education

## Abstract

This paper reports on a case study which examined factors leading to the adoption of graphics calculators (GCs) by secondary mathematics teachers in the state of New South Wales, Australia. In total, 587 teachers of the General Mathematics Course (Years 11 and 12) participated in the study. The median teachers' stage of adoption of GCs was found to be at the "Understanding and application of the process" level, the third lowest on a six point scale. The results also indicate that competence is the most important factor in explaining stages of adoption, training the second most important, followed by personal interest in GCs as well as faculty support. Teachers' gender, teaching experience, educational qualifications and the number of GCs in schools were not found to be statistically significant. Qualitative analysis of teachers' open ended comments also shed light on the nature of the explanatory variables. The findings are relevant to curriculum development policy and the design of professional development programs, and has implications for the introduction of other technologies.

## Citation

Handal, B., Cavanagh, M., Wood, L., Petocz, P. & Petocz, P. (2011). Factors leading to the adoption of a learning technology: The case of graphics calculators. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(2),. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved June 16, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/43938/.

## References

View References & Citations Map- Alguire, H. & Forster, P.A. (1999). Promoting mathematical understanding through the use of graphics calculators. Proceedings of the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Certification Authorities Conference (pp. 131-144). Perth: Curriculum Council.
- Arnold, S. (2004). Mathematics education for the third millennium: Visions of a future for handheld classroom technology. In I. Putt, R. Faragher & M. McLean (Eds.), Mathematics education for the third millennium: Towards 2010. Proceedings of the 27th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 16-28. Sydney: MERGA.
- Bei, L. & Simpson, E. (1995). The determinants of consumers’ purchase decisions for recycled products: An application of acquisition-transaction utility theory. In F. Kardes and M. Sujan (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 257-261). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer
- Burril, G. (1992). The graphing calculator: A tool for change. In J.T. Fey & C.R. Hirsch (Eds.), Calculators in Mathematics Education (pp. 14-22). Reston, Va: National Council of Teachers of
- Cafolla, R. & Knee, R. (1995). Factors limiting technology integration in education: The leadership gap. Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 556-560.
- Cavanagh, M. & Mitchelmore, M. (2003). Graphics calculators in the learning of mathematics: Teacher understandings and classroom practices. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 5, 3-18.
- Clarke, T. (2001). Spreadsheet assessment tasks for General Mathematics. Reflections, 26(1), 31-32.
- Christensen, R. & Knezek, G. (1999). Stages of adoption for technology in education. Computers in New Zealand Schools, 11(3), 25-29.
- Christensen, R. & Knezek, G. (2001). Equity and diversity in K-12 applications of information technology: KIDS project findings for 2000-2001. Institute for the Integration of Technology into Teaching and Learning. [viewed 29 July 2010, verified 21 Apr 2011] http://www.iittl.unt.edu/KIDS2001/index.htm
- Ertmer, P.A., Addison, P., Lane, M., Ross, E. & Woods, D. (1999). Examining teachers’ beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 54-72.
- Evans-Andris, M. (1995). An examination of computing styles among teachers in elementary schools. Educational Technology Research& Development, 43(2), 15-31.
- Featherman, M. & Pavlou, P. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451-474. [verified 21 Apr 2011] http://sighci.org/amcis02/CR/Featherman.pdf
- Forgasz, H. & Prince, N. (2001). Computers for secondary mathematics: Who uses them and how? Proceedings of the 2001 Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Fremantle, WA. [viewed 10 Jun 2003, verified 21 Apr 2011] http://www.aare.edu.au/01pap/for01109.htm
- Forgasz, H. (2002). Teachers and computers for secondary mathematics. Education and Information Technology, 7(2), 111-125.
- Forgasz, H., Griffith, S. & Tan, H. (2006). Gender, equity, teachers, students and technology use in secondary mathematics classrooms. Proceedings of the Nineteenth ICMI Conference
- Geiger, V. & Goos, M. (1996). Number plugging or problem solving? Using technology to support collaborative learning. In P. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology and Mathematics Education. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, (pp. 10-19). Melbourne: MERGA. [verified 21 Apr 2011]
- Grove, M. (2001). General Maths: What’s in it? Reflections, 26(1), 24-26.
- Hadley, M. & Sheingold, K. (1993). Commonalities and distinctive patterns in teachers' integration of computers. American Journal of Education, 101(3), 261-315.
- Handal, B., Bobis, J. & Grimison, L. (2001). Teachers' mathematical beliefs and practices in teaching and learning thematically. In J. Bobis, B. Perry& M. Mitchelmore (Eds.), Numeracy and beyond. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Inc (pp. 265-272), Sydney: MERGA.
- Handal, B. & Herrington, T. (2003). Mathematics teachers beliefs and curriculum reform. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(1), 59-69.
- Handal, B., Chinnappan, M. & Herrington, T. (2004). Measuring the adoption of graphic calculators by secondary mathematics teachers. Proceedings of the 2nd National Conference on Graphing Calculators (pp. 29-43). University Sains Malaysia.
- Hudson, R., Porter, A. & Nelson, M. (2008). The view of secondary school mathematics teachers in Australia regarding the use of technology in the classroom. In J. Luca& E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2008 (pp. 5771-5777). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
- Kwon, O.N. (2002). The effect of calculator-based ranger activities on students' graphing ability. School Science and Mathematics, 102(2), 57-67.
- Loong, E. (2003). Australian secondary school teachers’ use of the Internet for mathematics. In L. Bragg, C. Campbell, G. Herbert& J. Mousley (Eds.), Mathematics education research: Innovation, networking, opportunity (Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 484-491). Sydney: MERGA.
- Ndubisi, N. (2004). Factors influencing e-learning adoption intention: Examining the determinant structure of the decomposed theory of planned behaviour constructs. In Transforming knowledge into wisdom. Proceedings of the 27th HERDSA Annual Conference, Miri, Sarawak, 4-7 July, pp 252.
- Pender, B. (2000). Some words of caution about graphics calculators. In W. Mollony & M. Stephens (Eds.), Students, mathematics and graphics calculators into the new millennium. Proceedings of the 2003 Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers Inc. (pp. 163-167).
- Routitsky, A. & Tobin, P. (1998). A survey of graphics calculator use in Victorian secondary schools. In C. Kanes, M. Goos & E. Warren (Eds.), Teaching mathematics in new times. Proceedings of the 21st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 484-491. Gold Coast: MERGA.
- Russell, A.L. (1995). Stages in learning new technology: Naive adult email users. Computers& Education, 25(4), 173-178.
- Shah Azam, Md. (2007). Internet adoption and usage in Bangladesh. Japanese Journal of Administrative Science, 20(1), 43-54.
- Simonsen, L.M. & Dick, T.P. (1997). Teachers’ perceptions of the impact of graphic calculators in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Technology, 16, 360 Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2011, 27(2)
- Thomas, M.O.J. (2006). Teachers using computers in mathematics: A longitudinal study. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual
- Tobin, P., Routitsky, A. & Jones, P. (1999). Graphics calculators in Victorian secondary schools: Teacher perceptions of use. In J. Truran & K. Truran (Eds.), Making the difference. Proceedings
- Weber, T.E. (1998). Graphing technology and its effect on solving inequalities. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. Wayne State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 01A, 88.
- Zaichkowsky, J. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. The Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 341-352.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References## Cited By

View References & Citations Map-
### Conditions Influencing Mathematics Teachers´ Uptake of Digital Tools – a Systematic Literature Review

#### Marie Utterberg, Johan Lundin & Berner Lindström, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2017 (Mar 05, 2017) pp. 2016–2029

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.