You are here:

Students’ Satisfaction from Blended Learning Instruction
PROCEEDINGS

, , , , , Democritus University of Thrace, Greece

TCC, ISSN 1937-1659 Publisher: TCCHawaii

Abstract

During the past few years the number of courses offered online has greatly increased as technology has made delivery of such courses more feasible. Blended learning environment amalgamates the advantages of distance education with the effective aspects of traditional education. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of blended learning instruction in terms of students’ satisfaction. Participants were sixty one (n=61) undergraduate students, between the ages from 17-24 years old. Forty-four percentage (44.3%) of the participants were male and fifty-six were female (55.7%). For the data collection at the end of this study, students completed a questionnaire with 2 sections. The first section included the students’ demographic/personal data. The second section evaluated students’ satisfaction about the blended learning course. Students’ satisfaction had been acknowledged as an important factor in order to estimate the effectiveness of a course, especially a blended course. Data analysis revealed that perceived e-learner satisfaction was higher than the average indicating students’ high satisfaction with the overall learning experience.

Citation

Giannousi, M., Vernadakis, N., Derri, V., Michalopoulos, M. & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2009). Students’ Satisfaction from Blended Learning Instruction. In Proceedings of TCC 2009 (pp. 61-68). TCCHawaii. Retrieved January 17, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Needham, MA: Sloan.
  2. Arbaugh, J.B. (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with Internet-based MBA courses. Journal of management education, 24(1), 32-54.
  3. Arbaugh, J.B. (2004). Learning to learn online: A study of perceptual changes between multiple online course experiences. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 169-182.
  4. Biner, P.M., Dean, R.S., & Mellinger, A.E. (1994). Factors underlying distance learner satisfaction with televised college-level courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 60-71.
  5. Bollinger, D.U., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 61-67.
  6. Chang, V., & Fisher, D. (2003). The validation and application of a new learning environment instrument for online learning in higher education. In M.S. Khine& D. Fisher (Eds.), Technology-rich learning environments: A future perspective (pp. 1-18). Singapore: World Scientific.
  7. Collins Cobuild English Dictionary (1999). London, UK: HarperCollins Publishers.
  8. DeBourgh, G.A. (2003). Predictors of students satisfaction in distance-deliverd graduate nursing courses: what matter most? Journal of Professional Nursing. 19:149-163.
  9. Finn, A., Bucceri, M. (2004). A case study approach to blended learning. Los Angeles: Centra Software. Retrieved March 23, 2008.
  10. Heterick, B., & Twigg, C. (2003, February). The learning market space [Online]. Available at: http://www.thencat.org/Newsletters/Feb03.html
  11. Moore, M.G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Osguthorpe, R.T. And Graham, C.R., 2003. Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp 227-233.
  12. Sahin, I., & Shelley, M. (2008). Considering students’ perceptions: The Distance Education Student Satisfaction Model. Educational Technology& Society, 11, 216-223.
  13. Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 44(1), 5–27.
  14. Smith, P.L., & Dillon, C.L. (1999). Comparing distance learning and classroom learning: Conceptual considerations. The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 623.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Evaluating Student Satisfaction with Blended Learning in a Gender-Segregated Environment

    Mahmoud Abou Naaj, Mirna Nachouki & Ahmed Ankit, Ajman University of Science & Technology, United Arab Emirates

    Journal of Information Technology Education: Research Vol. 11, No. 1 (Jan 01, 2012) pp. 185–200

  2. Learner practice and satisfaction in a blended learning environment

    Bruce White & Ruth Geer, University of South Australia, Australia

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2010 (Oct 18, 2010) pp. 569–578

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.