You are here:

Designing Web-Based Educative Curriculum Materials for the Social Studies
ARTICLE

, University of North Carolina Wilmington, United States ; , Auburn University, United States ; , Indiana University, United States

CITE Journal Volume 13, Number 2, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

This paper reports on a design experiment of web-based curriculum materials explicitly created to help social studies teachers develop their professional teaching knowledge. Web-based social studies curriculum reform efforts, human-centered interface design, and investigations into educative curriculum materials are reviewed, as well as examples of previous efforts to develop educatively scaffolded teaching resources. Three teachers piloted the materials created by the authors, and their experiences are described. The authors then make recommendations for the design of future educative curricula.

Citation

Callahan, C., Saye, J. & Brush, T. (2013). Designing Web-Based Educative Curriculum Materials for the Social Studies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 126-155. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved February 17, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bogdan, R., & Bilken, S. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  2. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
  3. Callahan, C. (2009). Using educative curriculum materials to promote the development of professional teaching knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Auburn University, Auburn, AL.
  4. Chang, M.M. (2007). Enhancing web-based language learning through self-monitoring. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 187-196.
  5. Chen, D-T., & Hung, D. (2002). Two kinds of scaffolding: The dialectical process within the authenticity-generalizibilty (A-G) Continuum. Educational Technology& Society, 5(4).
  6. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon& T.O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15-22). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  7. Collins, A., Brown, J., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494): Hillsdale, NJ:
  8. Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers' learning. The Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 287-303.
  9. Cornett, J.W. (1990). Teacher thinking about curriculum and instruction: A case study of a secondary social studies teacher. Theory and Research in Social Education, 18(3), 248273.
  10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1977). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass.
  11. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
  12. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  13. Davis, E., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3-14.
  14. Davis, E., Beyer, C., Forbes, C., & Stevens, S. (2007). Promoting pedagogical design capacity through teachers' narratives. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
  15. Demetriadis, S., Papadopoulos, P., Stamelos, I., & Fischer, F. (2008). The effect of scaffolding students’ context-generating cognitive activity in technology-enhanced casebased learning. Computers& Education, 51(2), 939-954.
  16. Denzin, N. (1978). The research act. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  17. Dinov, I.D., Sanchez, J., & Christou, N. (2008). Pedagogical utilization and assessment of the statistic online computational resource in introductory probability and statistics courses. Computers& Education, 50(1), 284-300.
  18. Doolittle, P., Hicks, D., & Ewing, T. (2004). The SCIM-C strategy: Expert historians, historical inquiry, and multimedia. Social Education, 68(3), 221-225.
  19. Dreyer, C., & Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within technology enhanced learning environments. System, 31(3), 349-365.
  20. Fishman, B. (2003). Linking on-line video and curriculum to leverage community knowledge. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Using video in teacher education (Vol. 10, pp. 201-234). New York, NY: Elsevier.
  21. Gao, T. (2003). The effects of different levels of interaction on the achievement and motivational perceptions of college students in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14(4), 367-386. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education.
  22. Garet, M.S., Porter, A.C., Desimone, L., Birman, B.F., & Yoon, K.S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945.
  23. Ghani, J.A., & Deshpande, S.P. (1994). Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction. The Journal of Psychology, 128(4), 381391.
  24. Golanics, J.D., & Nussbaum, E.M. (2008). Enhancing online collaborative argumentation through question elaboration and goal instructions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 167-180.
  25. Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2004). Curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teacher learning? (Research report No. R-04-1). Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
  26. Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open-ended learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Volume II (pp. 115-140). Mahwah,
  27. Hoffman, D.L., & Novak, T.P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. The Journal of Marketing, 50-68.
  28. Holton, D., & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), 127-143.
  29. Huberman, A.M., & Miles, M.B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428-444).
  30. Krajcik, J.S., & Blumenfeld, P. (2006). Project-based learning. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–334). New York, NY: Cambridge
  31. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. New York, NY: Sage.
  32. Lloyd, G. (1999). Two teachers conceptions of a reform-oriented curriculum: Implications for mathematics teacher development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(3), 227-252.
  33. Lortie, D.C. (2002). Schoolteacher: A sociological study (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2)
  34. Molich, R., & Nielsen, J. (1990). Improving a human-computer dialogue. Communications of the ACM, 33(3), 338-348.
  35. Moshman, D., & Geil, M. (1998). Collaborative reasoning: Evidence for collective rationality. Thinking and Reasoning, 4(3), 231-248.
  36. Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow theory and research. In C.R. Snyder& S.J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 195-206). Oxford, England:
  37. Newmann, F. (1991). Classroom thoughtfulness and students' higher order thinking: Common indicators and diverse social studies courses. Theory and Research in Social Education, 19(4), 410-433.
  38. Newmann, F., & Wehlage, G. (1993). Five standards of authentic instruction. Authentic Learning, 50(7), 8-12.
  39. Newmann, F., Wehlage, G., & Lamborn, S. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11-39). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  40. Novak, T.P., Hoffman, D.L., & Duhachek, A. (2003). The influence of goal-directed and experiential activities on online flow experiences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1), 3-16.
  41. Novak, T.P., Hoffman, D.L., & Yung, Y.F. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing Science, 19(1), 22-42.
  42. Oviatt, S. (2006). Human-centered design meets cognitive load theory: Designing interfaces that help people think. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference on Multimedia, New York, NY.
  43. Oliver, D., Newmann, F., & Singleton, L. (1992). Teaching public issues in the secondary school classroom. The Social Studies, 83, 101-103.
  44. Onosko, J. (1991). Barriers to the promotion of higher order thinking in social studies. Theory and Research in Social Education, 19(4), 341–366.
  45. Paas, F., Renkel, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1-8.
  46. Parker, W. (2006). Public discourses in schools: Purposes, problems, possibilities. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 11-18.
  47. Parker, W., & Zumeta, W. (1999). Toward an aristocracy of everyone: Policy study in the high school curriculum. Theory and Research in Social Education, 27(1), 9-44.
  48. Patton, M. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  49. Pea, R. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423-451.
  50. Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., & Gertzog, W.A. (1982), Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211– 227.
  51. Remillard, J. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Two fourth grade teachers’ use of a new mathematics text. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 331.
  52. Remillard, J. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.
  53. Richardson, V., & Kile, R. (1999). Learning from videocases. In M.A. Lundeberg, B.B. Levin, & H.L. Harrington (Eds.), Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases (pp. 121-136). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  54. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1992). The use of scaffolds for teaching higher-level cognitive strategies. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 26–33.
  55. Rousseau, C., Bellik, Y., Vernier, F., & Bazalgette, D. (2006). A framework for the intelligent multimodal presentation of information. Signal Processing, 86(12), 36963713.
  56. Saye, J., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 77-96.
  57. Saye, J., & Brush, T. (2004). Promoting civic competence through problem-based history learning environments. In G. Hamot, J. Patrick, & R. Leming (Ed.), Civic learning in teacher education: International perspectives on education for democracy in the preparation of teachers (Vol. 3). Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education.
  58. Saye, J., & Brush, T. (2005). The persistent issues in history network. Social Education, 69(3), 168-171.
  59. Saye, J., Kohlmeier, J., Brush, T., Mitchell, L., & Farmer, C. (2009). Using mentoring to develop professional teaching knowledge for problem-based historical inquiry. Theory and Research in Social Education, 37(1), 196-230.
  60. Schneider, R., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. (2000). The role of educative curriculum materials in reforming science education. In B. Fishman& S.O'Conner-Divelbiss (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth international Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 54-61).
  61. Schwartz, D., Bransford, J., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 1-51). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  62. Sharma, P., & Hannafin, M. (2007). Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments 15(1), 27-46.
  63. Shaver, J. (1996). The prospects for issues-centered education. In R.W. Evans& D.W. Saxe (Eds.), Handbook on teaching social issues. Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.
  64. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  65. Simon, H.A. (1976). The information-storage system called human memory. In M.
  66. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science 12(2), 257–285.
  67. Thomas, G., Wineburg, S., Grossman, P., Myhre, O., & Woolworth, S. (1998). In the company of colleagues: An interim report on the development of a community of teacher learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 21-32.
  68. Tochon, F. (1999). Video study groups for education, development and change. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.
  69. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  70. Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  71. Wertsch, J. (1995). The need for action in sociocultural research. In J. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 56-74). Cambridge, MA:
  72. Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17(2), 89-100.
  73. Yelland, N., & Masters, J. (2005). Rethinking scaffolding in the information age. Computers& Education, 48, 362-382.
  74. Zhang, D. (2005). Interactive multimedia-based e-learning: A study of effectiveness. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 149-162.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Designing digital resources to effectively scaffold teachers’ learning

    Cory Callahan, University of Alabama, United States

    Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia Vol. 23, No. 4 (October 2014) pp. 309–334

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.