(Re)Anchored Video Centered Engagement: The Transferability of Preservice Training to Practice
ARTICLE
Gail Dickinson, Emily Summers, Texas State University—San Marcos, United States
CITE Journal Volume 10, Number 1, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
This longitudinal study tracks primary participants over 3 years from their last year of university preservice teaching training through their second year of in-service teaching via surveys, interviews, and teaching observations. The study employs a descriptive case study design to examine the transfer of preservice content, pedagogy, and video technology learning into teaching practice. The study places the model case studies within the larger context of analyzed observational and artifact data from 7 years of preservice teachers’ learning about (re)anchored, video-centered engagement.
Citation
Dickinson, G. & Summers, E. (2010). (Re)Anchored Video Centered Engagement: The Transferability of Preservice Training to Practice. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(1), 106-118. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved March 19, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/32289/.
© 2010 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Bransford, J., Sherwood, R., Hasselbring, T., Kinzer, C., & Williams, S. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition education and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp 115-141).
- Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992). The Jasper Series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27, 291-315.
- Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt.(1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cuban, L. Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813-834.
- Etheris, A.I., & Tan, S.C. (2004). Computer-supported collaborative problem solving and anchored instruction in a mathematics classroom: An exploratory study. International Journal of Learning Technology, 1(1), 16-39.
- Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research in Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416.
- Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T.C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 5971.
- Hsin-Yih C.S. (2000). Using video-based anchored instruction to enhance learning: Taiwan's experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 57-69.
- Kearney, M. & Schuck, S. (2006). Spotlight on authentic learning: Student developed digital video projects. Australasian Journal or Educational Technology, 22(2), 189-208.
- Krajcik, J.S., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (2002). Teaching science in elementary and
- Kurz, T.L., & Batarelo, I. (2005). Using anchored instruction to evaluate mathematical growth and understanding. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 33(4), 421-436.
- Lamberg, T.D., & Middleton, J.A. (2009). Designing research perspectives on transitioning from individual microgenic interviews to a whole-class teaching experiment. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 233-245.
- Petrosino, A.J. (2004). Anchor videos: How to. Retrieved from Anchor Videos website at the University of Texas: http://www.edb.utexas.edu/anchorvideo/howto.php
- Sanny, R., & Teale, W. (2008). Using multimedia anchored instruction cases in literacy methods courses: Lessons learned from pre-service teachers. Journal of Literacy& Technology, 9(1), 2-35 Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(1)
- Schwartz, D.L., & Hartman, K. (2007). It is not television anymore: Designing digital video for learning and assessment. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S.J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 349-366). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map-
Can UTeach? Assessing the relative effectiveness of STEM teachers
Ben Backes, Dan Goldhaber, Whitney Cade, Kate Sullivan & Melissa Dodson
Economics of Education Review Vol. 64, No. 1 (June 2018) pp. 184–198
-
Teaching Teachers for the Future: Building the Educational Technology Capacity of Pre-service Teachers in Australian Universities, Part 2
Chris Campbell, The University of Queensland, Australia; Peter Albion, University of Southern Queensland, Australia; Matthew Kearney, Damian Maher & Kimberley Pressick-Kilborn, University of Technology Sydney, Australia; Jason Zagami, Griffith University, Australia
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 2241–2248
-
Driving Pre-Service Science Teachers’ TPACK Development Through Their Generative Use Of Digital Video
Matthew Kearney, Kimberly Pressick-Kilborn & Damian Maher, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia, Australia
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 1381–1388
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.